Women workers and women at home are equally inactive: NHANES 2003-2006

Jeremy A. Steeves, Rachel A. Murphy, Vadim Zipunnikov, Scott J. Strath, Tamara B. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of female homemakers (those who stay at home to care for the home or family) has increased to 29%. Homemakers may be more active than employed women (EW). Limited data are available for domestic-related activity; therefore, the assessment of the activity levels of homemakers has been sparse. This study compared objectively measured activity (total activity counts, counts per minute, and percent time in various activity intensity levels) of homemakers and EW. Methods: Women's (18-60 yr) accelerometer data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in 2014 (n = 1763). Daily (hour-by-hour) profiles of activity were compared between homemakers and EW. Results: Women spent most of their day in sedentary (∼55%) and light (∼32%) activity, with limited lifestyle (∼11%) and moderate vigorous physical activity (MVPA; ∼2%); and there were no differences between the homemakers and EW. Hour-by-hour analysis showed that the homemakers had more light and less sedentary activity than EW during the afternoon (P <0.002), whereas EW had more MVPA at times corresponding to commuting to and from work and midday (P <0.002). On weekdays, EW initiated activity earlier than homemakers but not on weekends. On weekends, both groups had less MVPA than weekdays. Employed women with child(ren) younger than 18 yr had greater counts per minute and lifestyle activity and less sedentary activity than EW without child(ren) younger than 18 yr. Conclusion: Our hourly analysis delineated important differences in activity between the groups. Homemakers accumulate enough light activity throughout the day to be as active as EW who are highly sedentary during the workday, but seem to acquire activity through commuting. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase activity are highly desirable and should take into consideration the temporality of homemakers and EW activity patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1635-1642
Number of pages8
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume47
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Nutrition Surveys
Light
Life Style
Home Care Services

Keywords

  • Children
  • Employment
  • Female
  • Homemaker
  • Occupational activity
  • Physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Women workers and women at home are equally inactive : NHANES 2003-2006. / Steeves, Jeremy A.; Murphy, Rachel A.; Zipunnikov, Vadim; Strath, Scott J.; Harris, Tamara B.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2015, p. 1635-1642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steeves, Jeremy A. ; Murphy, Rachel A. ; Zipunnikov, Vadim ; Strath, Scott J. ; Harris, Tamara B. / Women workers and women at home are equally inactive : NHANES 2003-2006. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2015 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 1635-1642.
@article{ac2b51254eb2422486b46ff18be93b42,
title = "Women workers and women at home are equally inactive: NHANES 2003-2006",
abstract = "Purpose: The prevalence of female homemakers (those who stay at home to care for the home or family) has increased to 29{\%}. Homemakers may be more active than employed women (EW). Limited data are available for domestic-related activity; therefore, the assessment of the activity levels of homemakers has been sparse. This study compared objectively measured activity (total activity counts, counts per minute, and percent time in various activity intensity levels) of homemakers and EW. Methods: Women's (18-60 yr) accelerometer data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in 2014 (n = 1763). Daily (hour-by-hour) profiles of activity were compared between homemakers and EW. Results: Women spent most of their day in sedentary (∼55{\%}) and light (∼32{\%}) activity, with limited lifestyle (∼11{\%}) and moderate vigorous physical activity (MVPA; ∼2{\%}); and there were no differences between the homemakers and EW. Hour-by-hour analysis showed that the homemakers had more light and less sedentary activity than EW during the afternoon (P <0.002), whereas EW had more MVPA at times corresponding to commuting to and from work and midday (P <0.002). On weekdays, EW initiated activity earlier than homemakers but not on weekends. On weekends, both groups had less MVPA than weekdays. Employed women with child(ren) younger than 18 yr had greater counts per minute and lifestyle activity and less sedentary activity than EW without child(ren) younger than 18 yr. Conclusion: Our hourly analysis delineated important differences in activity between the groups. Homemakers accumulate enough light activity throughout the day to be as active as EW who are highly sedentary during the workday, but seem to acquire activity through commuting. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase activity are highly desirable and should take into consideration the temporality of homemakers and EW activity patterns.",
keywords = "Children, Employment, Female, Homemaker, Occupational activity, Physical activity",
author = "Steeves, {Jeremy A.} and Murphy, {Rachel A.} and Vadim Zipunnikov and Strath, {Scott J.} and Harris, {Tamara B.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0000000000000582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1635--1642",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women workers and women at home are equally inactive

T2 - NHANES 2003-2006

AU - Steeves, Jeremy A.

AU - Murphy, Rachel A.

AU - Zipunnikov, Vadim

AU - Strath, Scott J.

AU - Harris, Tamara B.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: The prevalence of female homemakers (those who stay at home to care for the home or family) has increased to 29%. Homemakers may be more active than employed women (EW). Limited data are available for domestic-related activity; therefore, the assessment of the activity levels of homemakers has been sparse. This study compared objectively measured activity (total activity counts, counts per minute, and percent time in various activity intensity levels) of homemakers and EW. Methods: Women's (18-60 yr) accelerometer data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in 2014 (n = 1763). Daily (hour-by-hour) profiles of activity were compared between homemakers and EW. Results: Women spent most of their day in sedentary (∼55%) and light (∼32%) activity, with limited lifestyle (∼11%) and moderate vigorous physical activity (MVPA; ∼2%); and there were no differences between the homemakers and EW. Hour-by-hour analysis showed that the homemakers had more light and less sedentary activity than EW during the afternoon (P <0.002), whereas EW had more MVPA at times corresponding to commuting to and from work and midday (P <0.002). On weekdays, EW initiated activity earlier than homemakers but not on weekends. On weekends, both groups had less MVPA than weekdays. Employed women with child(ren) younger than 18 yr had greater counts per minute and lifestyle activity and less sedentary activity than EW without child(ren) younger than 18 yr. Conclusion: Our hourly analysis delineated important differences in activity between the groups. Homemakers accumulate enough light activity throughout the day to be as active as EW who are highly sedentary during the workday, but seem to acquire activity through commuting. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase activity are highly desirable and should take into consideration the temporality of homemakers and EW activity patterns.

AB - Purpose: The prevalence of female homemakers (those who stay at home to care for the home or family) has increased to 29%. Homemakers may be more active than employed women (EW). Limited data are available for domestic-related activity; therefore, the assessment of the activity levels of homemakers has been sparse. This study compared objectively measured activity (total activity counts, counts per minute, and percent time in various activity intensity levels) of homemakers and EW. Methods: Women's (18-60 yr) accelerometer data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in 2014 (n = 1763). Daily (hour-by-hour) profiles of activity were compared between homemakers and EW. Results: Women spent most of their day in sedentary (∼55%) and light (∼32%) activity, with limited lifestyle (∼11%) and moderate vigorous physical activity (MVPA; ∼2%); and there were no differences between the homemakers and EW. Hour-by-hour analysis showed that the homemakers had more light and less sedentary activity than EW during the afternoon (P <0.002), whereas EW had more MVPA at times corresponding to commuting to and from work and midday (P <0.002). On weekdays, EW initiated activity earlier than homemakers but not on weekends. On weekends, both groups had less MVPA than weekdays. Employed women with child(ren) younger than 18 yr had greater counts per minute and lifestyle activity and less sedentary activity than EW without child(ren) younger than 18 yr. Conclusion: Our hourly analysis delineated important differences in activity between the groups. Homemakers accumulate enough light activity throughout the day to be as active as EW who are highly sedentary during the workday, but seem to acquire activity through commuting. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase activity are highly desirable and should take into consideration the temporality of homemakers and EW activity patterns.

KW - Children

KW - Employment

KW - Female

KW - Homemaker

KW - Occupational activity

KW - Physical activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941278849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941278849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000582

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000582

M3 - Article

C2 - 25412296

AN - SCOPUS:84941278849

VL - 47

SP - 1635

EP - 1642

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 8

ER -