Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making

Julia Abelson, Pierre Gerlier Forest, John Eyles, Ann Casebeer, Gail Mackean, Francois Pierre Gauvin, Denise Kouri, Elizabeth Martin, Mike Pennock, Patricia Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Health policy decision-makers are grappling with increasingly complex and ethically controversial decisions at a time when citizens are demanding more involvement in these decision processes. Objectives: To assess and revise a set of guiding principles for the design of public involvement processes generated from a synthesis of public participation design and evaluation frameworks that can be used to inform the design and evaluation of future public participation processes in the health sector. Methods: Six focus groups held in five Canadian provinces comprising citizens with considerable experience of public participation processes. Results and discussion: Our findings suggest that citizen participants are highly critical of, and discerning about, their public participation experiences. Yet, they are optimistic and determined to contribute in meaningful ways to future public policy processes. They are clear about where improvements are needed and give top priority to what information is shared, and how, among participants and decision-makers. The views of experienced citizens mapped well onto most of the prior principles of public involvement with a few modifications. First, participants gave greater emphasis to the content and balance of information for the purposes of building trust and credibility between citizens and decision-makers. Second, participants viewed themselves, as well as decision-makers, as sources of information to be shared through the consultation process. Finally, participants stressed the importance of getting the information and communication principles right over addressing all other principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-212
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Health Services Research and Policy
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
decision making
citizen
decision maker
Health
health
participation
Public Policy
Health Policy
Focus Groups
Administrative Personnel
health policy
Referral and Consultation
Communication
evaluation
source of information
credibility
Community Participation
decision
public

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. / Abelson, Julia; Forest, Pierre Gerlier; Eyles, John; Casebeer, Ann; Mackean, Gail; Gauvin, Francois Pierre; Kouri, Denise; Martin, Elizabeth; Pennock, Mike; Smith, Patricia.

In: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.2004, p. 205-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abelson, Julia ; Forest, Pierre Gerlier ; Eyles, John ; Casebeer, Ann ; Mackean, Gail ; Gauvin, Francois Pierre ; Kouri, Denise ; Martin, Elizabeth ; Pennock, Mike ; Smith, Patricia. / Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. In: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2004 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 205-212.
@article{d19fbab4f63941e4ad71b58453c61ba4,
title = "Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making",
abstract = "Introduction: Health policy decision-makers are grappling with increasingly complex and ethically controversial decisions at a time when citizens are demanding more involvement in these decision processes. Objectives: To assess and revise a set of guiding principles for the design of public involvement processes generated from a synthesis of public participation design and evaluation frameworks that can be used to inform the design and evaluation of future public participation processes in the health sector. Methods: Six focus groups held in five Canadian provinces comprising citizens with considerable experience of public participation processes. Results and discussion: Our findings suggest that citizen participants are highly critical of, and discerning about, their public participation experiences. Yet, they are optimistic and determined to contribute in meaningful ways to future public policy processes. They are clear about where improvements are needed and give top priority to what information is shared, and how, among participants and decision-makers. The views of experienced citizens mapped well onto most of the prior principles of public involvement with a few modifications. First, participants gave greater emphasis to the content and balance of information for the purposes of building trust and credibility between citizens and decision-makers. Second, participants viewed themselves, as well as decision-makers, as sources of information to be shared through the consultation process. Finally, participants stressed the importance of getting the information and communication principles right over addressing all other principles.",
author = "Julia Abelson and Forest, {Pierre Gerlier} and John Eyles and Ann Casebeer and Gail Mackean and Gauvin, {Francois Pierre} and Denise Kouri and Elizabeth Martin and Mike Pennock and Patricia Smith",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1258/1355819042250203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "205--212",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research and Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making

AU - Abelson, Julia

AU - Forest, Pierre Gerlier

AU - Eyles, John

AU - Casebeer, Ann

AU - Mackean, Gail

AU - Gauvin, Francois Pierre

AU - Kouri, Denise

AU - Martin, Elizabeth

AU - Pennock, Mike

AU - Smith, Patricia

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Introduction: Health policy decision-makers are grappling with increasingly complex and ethically controversial decisions at a time when citizens are demanding more involvement in these decision processes. Objectives: To assess and revise a set of guiding principles for the design of public involvement processes generated from a synthesis of public participation design and evaluation frameworks that can be used to inform the design and evaluation of future public participation processes in the health sector. Methods: Six focus groups held in five Canadian provinces comprising citizens with considerable experience of public participation processes. Results and discussion: Our findings suggest that citizen participants are highly critical of, and discerning about, their public participation experiences. Yet, they are optimistic and determined to contribute in meaningful ways to future public policy processes. They are clear about where improvements are needed and give top priority to what information is shared, and how, among participants and decision-makers. The views of experienced citizens mapped well onto most of the prior principles of public involvement with a few modifications. First, participants gave greater emphasis to the content and balance of information for the purposes of building trust and credibility between citizens and decision-makers. Second, participants viewed themselves, as well as decision-makers, as sources of information to be shared through the consultation process. Finally, participants stressed the importance of getting the information and communication principles right over addressing all other principles.

AB - Introduction: Health policy decision-makers are grappling with increasingly complex and ethically controversial decisions at a time when citizens are demanding more involvement in these decision processes. Objectives: To assess and revise a set of guiding principles for the design of public involvement processes generated from a synthesis of public participation design and evaluation frameworks that can be used to inform the design and evaluation of future public participation processes in the health sector. Methods: Six focus groups held in five Canadian provinces comprising citizens with considerable experience of public participation processes. Results and discussion: Our findings suggest that citizen participants are highly critical of, and discerning about, their public participation experiences. Yet, they are optimistic and determined to contribute in meaningful ways to future public policy processes. They are clear about where improvements are needed and give top priority to what information is shared, and how, among participants and decision-makers. The views of experienced citizens mapped well onto most of the prior principles of public involvement with a few modifications. First, participants gave greater emphasis to the content and balance of information for the purposes of building trust and credibility between citizens and decision-makers. Second, participants viewed themselves, as well as decision-makers, as sources of information to be shared through the consultation process. Finally, participants stressed the importance of getting the information and communication principles right over addressing all other principles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044272171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044272171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1258/1355819042250203

DO - 10.1258/1355819042250203

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 205

EP - 212

JO - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 4

ER -