Why we should continue to study race . . . but do a better job

An essay on race, racism and health

Thomas A. Laveist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For at least a century, American medical and public health researchers have used race as a marker for biology, and have documented race-associated differences in health and illness behavior. The research has often been inappropriate and has led to abuses and erroneous conclusions about the role played by race in the production of disparities in health status. Consequently, some researchers have begun to advocate the abolition of medical and public health research using race. In this essay, I argue that, although the arguments against continuing to study race have some merit, more rather than fewer studies of race are needed. Researchers should be more careful in the use of race and more conscious of the limitations of the race concept.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-29
Number of pages9
JournalEthnicity and Disease
Volume6
Issue number1-2
StatePublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

Racism
Health
Research Personnel
Health Status Disparities
Public Health
Illness Behavior
Research

Keywords

  • Health
  • Race
  • Racism
  • Study of Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Why we should continue to study race . . . but do a better job : An essay on race, racism and health. / Laveist, Thomas A.

In: Ethnicity and Disease, Vol. 6, No. 1-2, 12.1996, p. 21-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa7f5a03b1a443f8a92c552be4ffc180,
title = "Why we should continue to study race . . . but do a better job: An essay on race, racism and health",
abstract = "For at least a century, American medical and public health researchers have used race as a marker for biology, and have documented race-associated differences in health and illness behavior. The research has often been inappropriate and has led to abuses and erroneous conclusions about the role played by race in the production of disparities in health status. Consequently, some researchers have begun to advocate the abolition of medical and public health research using race. In this essay, I argue that, although the arguments against continuing to study race have some merit, more rather than fewer studies of race are needed. Researchers should be more careful in the use of race and more conscious of the limitations of the race concept.",
keywords = "Health, Race, Racism, Study of Race",
author = "Laveist, {Thomas A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "21--29",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why we should continue to study race . . . but do a better job

T2 - An essay on race, racism and health

AU - Laveist, Thomas A.

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - For at least a century, American medical and public health researchers have used race as a marker for biology, and have documented race-associated differences in health and illness behavior. The research has often been inappropriate and has led to abuses and erroneous conclusions about the role played by race in the production of disparities in health status. Consequently, some researchers have begun to advocate the abolition of medical and public health research using race. In this essay, I argue that, although the arguments against continuing to study race have some merit, more rather than fewer studies of race are needed. Researchers should be more careful in the use of race and more conscious of the limitations of the race concept.

AB - For at least a century, American medical and public health researchers have used race as a marker for biology, and have documented race-associated differences in health and illness behavior. The research has often been inappropriate and has led to abuses and erroneous conclusions about the role played by race in the production of disparities in health status. Consequently, some researchers have begun to advocate the abolition of medical and public health research using race. In this essay, I argue that, although the arguments against continuing to study race have some merit, more rather than fewer studies of race are needed. Researchers should be more careful in the use of race and more conscious of the limitations of the race concept.

KW - Health

KW - Race

KW - Racism

KW - Study of Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030459477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030459477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

IS - 1-2

ER -