Why Don't We Know Whether Care Is Safe?

Julius Cuong Pham, Kevin D. Frick, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reliable data are essential to ensuring that health care is delivered safely and appropriately. Yet the availability of reliable data on safety remains surprisingly poor, as does our knowledge of what it costs (and should cost) to generate such data. The authors suggest the following as priorities: (1) develop valid and reliable measures of the common causes of preventable deaths; (2) evaluate whether a global measure of safety is valid, feasible, and useful; (3) explore the incremental value of collecting data for each patient safety measure; (4) evaluate if/how patient safety reporting systems can be used to influence outcomes at all levels; (5) explore the value-and the unintended consequences-of creating a list of reportable events; (6) evaluate the infrastructure required to monitor patient safety; and (7) explore the validity and usefulness of measurements of patient safety climate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-463
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • improvement
  • measurement
  • patient safety
  • quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Don't We Know Whether Care Is Safe?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this