Why do women underestimate the risk of cardiac disease? A literature review

Jean Hammond, Yenna Salamonson, Patricia M Davidson, Bronwyn Everett, Sharon Andrew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Despite the quantity of information available to women about risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), many women do not perceive this risk. Aim: This paper seeks to identify factors in the published literature that influence women's risk perception of heart disease, and how these perceptions influence health outcomes. Method: A literature search from 1985 to 2006 using the CINAHL, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases was undertaken. The keywords used were 'perceived risk', 'cardiac risk factors', 'cardiovascular disease', 'risk misconception', and 'heart disease', combined with 'women' and/or 'gender'. Additional data was obtained by manual searches of bibliographies of articles identified in the electronic searches, and Internet searches. Findings: Until the late 1980s, CVD was perceived as a disease which primarily affected men, as few large clinical trials recruited women. This resulted in a lack of data documenting the relationship between known risk factors and gender. Until recently, health professionals have not focused on disseminating gender-specific information about CVD risks to women, causing women to underestimate their risk of developing CVD even when risk factors are clearly evident. Furthermore, women are less likely than men to recognise the signs and symptoms of CVD, delay in seeking treatment, and fail to adopt healthy lifestyles, all of which increase the incidence of mortality and morbidity in a disease that is largely preventable. Conclusion: This review highlights the need for health professionals to 'bridge the gap' between perceived and actual risk of CVD in women, and to develop educational programs that specifically target women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Critical Care
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Health
Bibliography
Internet
Signs and Symptoms
Clinical Trials
Databases
Morbidity
Mortality
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Gender disparity
  • Literature review
  • Risk factors
  • Risk perception
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care

Cite this

Why do women underestimate the risk of cardiac disease? A literature review. / Hammond, Jean; Salamonson, Yenna; Davidson, Patricia M; Everett, Bronwyn; Andrew, Sharon.

In: Australian Critical Care, Vol. 20, No. 2, 05.2007, p. 53-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hammond, Jean ; Salamonson, Yenna ; Davidson, Patricia M ; Everett, Bronwyn ; Andrew, Sharon. / Why do women underestimate the risk of cardiac disease? A literature review. In: Australian Critical Care. 2007 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 53-59.
@article{a702669b742e4eb9a03f4b852e0ecd7b,
title = "Why do women underestimate the risk of cardiac disease? A literature review",
abstract = "Background: Despite the quantity of information available to women about risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), many women do not perceive this risk. Aim: This paper seeks to identify factors in the published literature that influence women's risk perception of heart disease, and how these perceptions influence health outcomes. Method: A literature search from 1985 to 2006 using the CINAHL, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases was undertaken. The keywords used were 'perceived risk', 'cardiac risk factors', 'cardiovascular disease', 'risk misconception', and 'heart disease', combined with 'women' and/or 'gender'. Additional data was obtained by manual searches of bibliographies of articles identified in the electronic searches, and Internet searches. Findings: Until the late 1980s, CVD was perceived as a disease which primarily affected men, as few large clinical trials recruited women. This resulted in a lack of data documenting the relationship between known risk factors and gender. Until recently, health professionals have not focused on disseminating gender-specific information about CVD risks to women, causing women to underestimate their risk of developing CVD even when risk factors are clearly evident. Furthermore, women are less likely than men to recognise the signs and symptoms of CVD, delay in seeking treatment, and fail to adopt healthy lifestyles, all of which increase the incidence of mortality and morbidity in a disease that is largely preventable. Conclusion: This review highlights the need for health professionals to 'bridge the gap' between perceived and actual risk of CVD in women, and to develop educational programs that specifically target women.",
keywords = "Cardiovascular disease, Gender disparity, Literature review, Risk factors, Risk perception, Women",
author = "Jean Hammond and Yenna Salamonson and Davidson, {Patricia M} and Bronwyn Everett and Sharon Andrew",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.aucc.2007.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Australian Critical Care",
issn = "1036-7314",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do women underestimate the risk of cardiac disease? A literature review

AU - Hammond, Jean

AU - Salamonson, Yenna

AU - Davidson, Patricia M

AU - Everett, Bronwyn

AU - Andrew, Sharon

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Despite the quantity of information available to women about risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), many women do not perceive this risk. Aim: This paper seeks to identify factors in the published literature that influence women's risk perception of heart disease, and how these perceptions influence health outcomes. Method: A literature search from 1985 to 2006 using the CINAHL, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases was undertaken. The keywords used were 'perceived risk', 'cardiac risk factors', 'cardiovascular disease', 'risk misconception', and 'heart disease', combined with 'women' and/or 'gender'. Additional data was obtained by manual searches of bibliographies of articles identified in the electronic searches, and Internet searches. Findings: Until the late 1980s, CVD was perceived as a disease which primarily affected men, as few large clinical trials recruited women. This resulted in a lack of data documenting the relationship between known risk factors and gender. Until recently, health professionals have not focused on disseminating gender-specific information about CVD risks to women, causing women to underestimate their risk of developing CVD even when risk factors are clearly evident. Furthermore, women are less likely than men to recognise the signs and symptoms of CVD, delay in seeking treatment, and fail to adopt healthy lifestyles, all of which increase the incidence of mortality and morbidity in a disease that is largely preventable. Conclusion: This review highlights the need for health professionals to 'bridge the gap' between perceived and actual risk of CVD in women, and to develop educational programs that specifically target women.

AB - Background: Despite the quantity of information available to women about risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), many women do not perceive this risk. Aim: This paper seeks to identify factors in the published literature that influence women's risk perception of heart disease, and how these perceptions influence health outcomes. Method: A literature search from 1985 to 2006 using the CINAHL, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases was undertaken. The keywords used were 'perceived risk', 'cardiac risk factors', 'cardiovascular disease', 'risk misconception', and 'heart disease', combined with 'women' and/or 'gender'. Additional data was obtained by manual searches of bibliographies of articles identified in the electronic searches, and Internet searches. Findings: Until the late 1980s, CVD was perceived as a disease which primarily affected men, as few large clinical trials recruited women. This resulted in a lack of data documenting the relationship between known risk factors and gender. Until recently, health professionals have not focused on disseminating gender-specific information about CVD risks to women, causing women to underestimate their risk of developing CVD even when risk factors are clearly evident. Furthermore, women are less likely than men to recognise the signs and symptoms of CVD, delay in seeking treatment, and fail to adopt healthy lifestyles, all of which increase the incidence of mortality and morbidity in a disease that is largely preventable. Conclusion: This review highlights the need for health professionals to 'bridge the gap' between perceived and actual risk of CVD in women, and to develop educational programs that specifically target women.

KW - Cardiovascular disease

KW - Gender disparity

KW - Literature review

KW - Risk factors

KW - Risk perception

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249734277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249734277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17568533

AN - SCOPUS:34249734277

VL - 20

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Australian Critical Care

JF - Australian Critical Care

SN - 1036-7314

IS - 2

ER -