When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words?

Joana Cholin, Brenda C Rapp, Michele Miozzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A central question for theories of inflected word processing is to determine under what circumstances compositional procedures apply. Some accounts (e.g., the dual-mechanism model; Clahsen, 1999) propose that compositional processes only apply to verbs that take productive affixes. For all other verbs, inflected forms are assumed to be stored in the lexicon in a nondecomposed manner. This account makes clear predictions about the consequences of disruption to the lexical access mechanisms involved in the spoken production of inflected forms. Briefly, it predicts that nonproductive forms (which require lexical access) should be more affected than productive forms (which, depending on the language task, may not). We tested these predictions through the detailed analysis of the spoken production of a German-speaking individual with an acquired lexical impairment resulting from a stroke. Analyses of response accuracy, error types, and frequency effects revealed that combinatorial processes are not restricted to verbs that take productive inflections. On this basis, we propose an alternative account, the stem-based assembly model (SAM), which posits that combinatorial processes may be available to all stems and not only to those that combine with productive affixes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-359
Number of pages26
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Language
Stroke
Verbs
Productive Affix
Lexical Access
Prediction

Keywords

  • Affixation
  • Inflections
  • Morphology
  • Neuropsychology
  • Productivity
  • Speech production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words? / Cholin, Joana; Rapp, Brenda C; Miozzo, Michele.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2010, p. 334-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1082e8e3785e449a8efaa5dd01a31027,
title = "When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words?",
abstract = "A central question for theories of inflected word processing is to determine under what circumstances compositional procedures apply. Some accounts (e.g., the dual-mechanism model; Clahsen, 1999) propose that compositional processes only apply to verbs that take productive affixes. For all other verbs, inflected forms are assumed to be stored in the lexicon in a nondecomposed manner. This account makes clear predictions about the consequences of disruption to the lexical access mechanisms involved in the spoken production of inflected forms. Briefly, it predicts that nonproductive forms (which require lexical access) should be more affected than productive forms (which, depending on the language task, may not). We tested these predictions through the detailed analysis of the spoken production of a German-speaking individual with an acquired lexical impairment resulting from a stroke. Analyses of response accuracy, error types, and frequency effects revealed that combinatorial processes are not restricted to verbs that take productive inflections. On this basis, we propose an alternative account, the stem-based assembly model (SAM), which posits that combinatorial processes may be available to all stems and not only to those that combine with productive affixes.",
keywords = "Affixation, Inflections, Morphology, Neuropsychology, Productivity, Speech production",
author = "Joana Cholin and Rapp, {Brenda C} and Michele Miozzo",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/02643294.2010.524467",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "334--359",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words?

AU - Cholin, Joana

AU - Rapp, Brenda C

AU - Miozzo, Michele

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - A central question for theories of inflected word processing is to determine under what circumstances compositional procedures apply. Some accounts (e.g., the dual-mechanism model; Clahsen, 1999) propose that compositional processes only apply to verbs that take productive affixes. For all other verbs, inflected forms are assumed to be stored in the lexicon in a nondecomposed manner. This account makes clear predictions about the consequences of disruption to the lexical access mechanisms involved in the spoken production of inflected forms. Briefly, it predicts that nonproductive forms (which require lexical access) should be more affected than productive forms (which, depending on the language task, may not). We tested these predictions through the detailed analysis of the spoken production of a German-speaking individual with an acquired lexical impairment resulting from a stroke. Analyses of response accuracy, error types, and frequency effects revealed that combinatorial processes are not restricted to verbs that take productive inflections. On this basis, we propose an alternative account, the stem-based assembly model (SAM), which posits that combinatorial processes may be available to all stems and not only to those that combine with productive affixes.

AB - A central question for theories of inflected word processing is to determine under what circumstances compositional procedures apply. Some accounts (e.g., the dual-mechanism model; Clahsen, 1999) propose that compositional processes only apply to verbs that take productive affixes. For all other verbs, inflected forms are assumed to be stored in the lexicon in a nondecomposed manner. This account makes clear predictions about the consequences of disruption to the lexical access mechanisms involved in the spoken production of inflected forms. Briefly, it predicts that nonproductive forms (which require lexical access) should be more affected than productive forms (which, depending on the language task, may not). We tested these predictions through the detailed analysis of the spoken production of a German-speaking individual with an acquired lexical impairment resulting from a stroke. Analyses of response accuracy, error types, and frequency effects revealed that combinatorial processes are not restricted to verbs that take productive inflections. On this basis, we propose an alternative account, the stem-based assembly model (SAM), which posits that combinatorial processes may be available to all stems and not only to those that combine with productive affixes.

KW - Affixation

KW - Inflections

KW - Morphology

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Productivity

KW - Speech production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952578099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952578099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467

DO - 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467

M3 - Article

C2 - 21104479

AN - SCOPUS:79952578099

VL - 27

SP - 334

EP - 359

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

IS - 4

ER -