When cure is no option: How explicit and hopeful can information be given? A qualitative study in breast cancer

Liesbeth van Vliet, Anneke Francke, Samanta Tomson, Nicole Plum, Elsken van der Wall, Jozien Bensing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how oncologists can balance explicit with general and realistic with hopeful information when discussing various topics at the transition from curative to palliative care in breast cancer. Methods: Qualitative analysis of focus groups consisting of female breast cancer survivors and healthy women. Results: Perceptions of survivors and healthy women largely overlapped. Participants thought that oncologists can help patients regain a future perspective during this consultation. To achieve this, four themes seemed important: honest medical information, availability of continued support, hope has many faces, and space to choose. Moreover, participants stressed they would need time to let the message sink in before any further information was provided. Conclusion: Participants thought that when confronted with this type of consultation they would need - more or less explicit - medical information and information regarding support. In order to maintain hope, knowledge about (treatment) possibilities is important, but also the certainty not to be abandoned by the hospital at a later stage of the disease and the confidence to remain able to make one's own decisions. Practice implications: A life-limiting diagnosis may shatter patients' future perspective; however, this study provides suggestions for oncologists to create a new perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-322
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume90
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Communication
  • Palliative care
  • Patient preference
  • Truth disclosure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this