TY - JOUR
T1 - What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK
AU - Leigh, Simon
AU - Robinson, Jude
AU - Yeung, Shunmay
AU - Coenen, Frans
AU - Carrol, Enitan D.
AU - Niessen, Louis W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding SL is funded by a studentship from the Institute of Infection and Global
Funding Information:
Health, The University of Liverpool and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 668303 (PERFORM study (Personalised Risk assessment in Febrile illness to Optimise Real-life Management across the European Union).
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Background Fever among children is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) attendance and a diagnostic conundrum; yet robust quantitative evidence regarding the preferences of parents and healthcare providers (HCPs) for managing fever is scarce. Objective To determine parental and HCP preferences for the management of paediatric febrile illness in the ED. Setting Ten children's centres and a children's ED in England from June 2018 to January 2019. Participants 98 parents of children aged 0-11 years, and 99 HCPs took part. Methods Nine focus-groups and coin-ranking exercises were conducted with parents, and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with both parents and HCPs, which asked respondents to choose their preferred option of several hypothetical management scenarios for paediatric febrile illness, with differing levels of visit time, out-of-pocket costs, antibiotic prescribing, HCP grade and pain/discomfort from investigations. Results The mean focus-group size was 4.4 participants (range 3-7), with a mean duration of 27.4 min (range 18-46 min). Response rates to the DCE among parents and HCPs were 94.2% and 98.2%, respectively. Avoiding pain from diagnostics, receiving a faster diagnosis and minimising wait times were major concerns for both parents and HCPs, with parents willing-to-pay £16.89 for every 1 hour reduction in waiting times. Both groups preferred treatment by consultants and nurse practitioners to treatment by doctors in postgraduate training. Parents were willing to trade-off considerable increases in waiting times (24.1 min) to be seen by consultants and to avoid additional pain from diagnostics (45.6 min). Reducing antibiotic prescribing was important to HCPs but not parents. Conclusions Both parents and HCPs care strongly about reducing visit time, avoiding pain from invasive investigations and receiving diagnostic insights faster when managing paediatric febrile illness. As such, overdue advances in diagnostic capabilities should improve child and carer experience and HCP satisfaction considerably in managing paediatric febrile illness.
AB - Background Fever among children is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) attendance and a diagnostic conundrum; yet robust quantitative evidence regarding the preferences of parents and healthcare providers (HCPs) for managing fever is scarce. Objective To determine parental and HCP preferences for the management of paediatric febrile illness in the ED. Setting Ten children's centres and a children's ED in England from June 2018 to January 2019. Participants 98 parents of children aged 0-11 years, and 99 HCPs took part. Methods Nine focus-groups and coin-ranking exercises were conducted with parents, and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with both parents and HCPs, which asked respondents to choose their preferred option of several hypothetical management scenarios for paediatric febrile illness, with differing levels of visit time, out-of-pocket costs, antibiotic prescribing, HCP grade and pain/discomfort from investigations. Results The mean focus-group size was 4.4 participants (range 3-7), with a mean duration of 27.4 min (range 18-46 min). Response rates to the DCE among parents and HCPs were 94.2% and 98.2%, respectively. Avoiding pain from diagnostics, receiving a faster diagnosis and minimising wait times were major concerns for both parents and HCPs, with parents willing-to-pay £16.89 for every 1 hour reduction in waiting times. Both groups preferred treatment by consultants and nurse practitioners to treatment by doctors in postgraduate training. Parents were willing to trade-off considerable increases in waiting times (24.1 min) to be seen by consultants and to avoid additional pain from diagnostics (45.6 min). Reducing antibiotic prescribing was important to HCPs but not parents. Conclusions Both parents and HCPs care strongly about reducing visit time, avoiding pain from invasive investigations and receiving diagnostic insights faster when managing paediatric febrile illness. As such, overdue advances in diagnostic capabilities should improve child and carer experience and HCP satisfaction considerably in managing paediatric febrile illness.
KW - discrete choice experiment
KW - emergency care
KW - infectious diseases
KW - paediatrics
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080889757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080889757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318209
DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318209
M3 - Article
C2 - 32107251
AN - SCOPUS:85080889757
SN - 1368-4973
VL - 105
SP - 765
EP - 771
JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections
JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections
IS - 8
ER -