Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches

A Historical Perspective

Massimiliano Visocchi, Domenico Gerardo Iacopino, Francesco Signorelli, Alessandro Olivi, Rosario Maugeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: We compiled a comprehensive literature review on the anatomic and clinical results of endoscopic approaches to the craniocervical junction (CVJ) to better contribute to identify the best strategy. Methods: An updated literature review was performed in the PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar medical databases, using the terms “Craniovertebral junction,” “Transoral approach,” “Transnasal approach,” “Transcervical approach,” “Endoscopic endonasal approach,” “Endoscopic transoral approach,” “Endoscopic transcervical approach.” Clinical series, anatomic studies, and comparative studies were reviewed. Results: Pure endonasal and cervical endoscopic approaches still have some disadvantages, including the learning curve and the deeper surgical field. Endoscopically assisted transoral surgery with 30° endoscopes represents an emerging option to standard microsurgical techniques for transoral approaches to the anterior CVJ. This approach should be considered as complementary rather than an alternative to the traditional microsurgical transoral-transpharyngeal approach. Conclusions: The transoral approach with sparing of the soft palate still remains the gold standard compared with the pure transnasal and transcervical approaches because of the wider working channel provided by the former technique. The transnasal endoscopic approach alone appears to be superior when the CVJ lesion exceeds the upper limit of the inferior third of the clivus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)544-557
Number of pages14
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume110
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Posterior Cranial Fossa
Soft Palate
Learning Curve
Endoscopes
PubMed
Databases

Keywords

  • Craniovertebral junction
  • Transcervical approach
  • Transnasal approach
  • Transoral approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches : A Historical Perspective. / Visocchi, Massimiliano; Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo; Signorelli, Francesco; Olivi, Alessandro; Maugeri, Rosario.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 110, 01.02.2018, p. 544-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Visocchi, Massimiliano ; Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo ; Signorelli, Francesco ; Olivi, Alessandro ; Maugeri, Rosario. / Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches : A Historical Perspective. In: World Neurosurgery. 2018 ; Vol. 110. pp. 544-557.
@article{f38a77902a6d4071a2d169ae0051b8ec,
title = "Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches: A Historical Perspective",
abstract = "Background: We compiled a comprehensive literature review on the anatomic and clinical results of endoscopic approaches to the craniocervical junction (CVJ) to better contribute to identify the best strategy. Methods: An updated literature review was performed in the PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar medical databases, using the terms “Craniovertebral junction,” “Transoral approach,” “Transnasal approach,” “Transcervical approach,” “Endoscopic endonasal approach,” “Endoscopic transoral approach,” “Endoscopic transcervical approach.” Clinical series, anatomic studies, and comparative studies were reviewed. Results: Pure endonasal and cervical endoscopic approaches still have some disadvantages, including the learning curve and the deeper surgical field. Endoscopically assisted transoral surgery with 30° endoscopes represents an emerging option to standard microsurgical techniques for transoral approaches to the anterior CVJ. This approach should be considered as complementary rather than an alternative to the traditional microsurgical transoral-transpharyngeal approach. Conclusions: The transoral approach with sparing of the soft palate still remains the gold standard compared with the pure transnasal and transcervical approaches because of the wider working channel provided by the former technique. The transnasal endoscopic approach alone appears to be superior when the CVJ lesion exceeds the upper limit of the inferior third of the clivus.",
keywords = "Craniovertebral junction, Transcervical approach, Transnasal approach, Transoral approach",
author = "Massimiliano Visocchi and Iacopino, {Domenico Gerardo} and Francesco Signorelli and Alessandro Olivi and Rosario Maugeri",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "544--557",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches

T2 - A Historical Perspective

AU - Visocchi, Massimiliano

AU - Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo

AU - Signorelli, Francesco

AU - Olivi, Alessandro

AU - Maugeri, Rosario

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background: We compiled a comprehensive literature review on the anatomic and clinical results of endoscopic approaches to the craniocervical junction (CVJ) to better contribute to identify the best strategy. Methods: An updated literature review was performed in the PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar medical databases, using the terms “Craniovertebral junction,” “Transoral approach,” “Transnasal approach,” “Transcervical approach,” “Endoscopic endonasal approach,” “Endoscopic transoral approach,” “Endoscopic transcervical approach.” Clinical series, anatomic studies, and comparative studies were reviewed. Results: Pure endonasal and cervical endoscopic approaches still have some disadvantages, including the learning curve and the deeper surgical field. Endoscopically assisted transoral surgery with 30° endoscopes represents an emerging option to standard microsurgical techniques for transoral approaches to the anterior CVJ. This approach should be considered as complementary rather than an alternative to the traditional microsurgical transoral-transpharyngeal approach. Conclusions: The transoral approach with sparing of the soft palate still remains the gold standard compared with the pure transnasal and transcervical approaches because of the wider working channel provided by the former technique. The transnasal endoscopic approach alone appears to be superior when the CVJ lesion exceeds the upper limit of the inferior third of the clivus.

AB - Background: We compiled a comprehensive literature review on the anatomic and clinical results of endoscopic approaches to the craniocervical junction (CVJ) to better contribute to identify the best strategy. Methods: An updated literature review was performed in the PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar medical databases, using the terms “Craniovertebral junction,” “Transoral approach,” “Transnasal approach,” “Transcervical approach,” “Endoscopic endonasal approach,” “Endoscopic transoral approach,” “Endoscopic transcervical approach.” Clinical series, anatomic studies, and comparative studies were reviewed. Results: Pure endonasal and cervical endoscopic approaches still have some disadvantages, including the learning curve and the deeper surgical field. Endoscopically assisted transoral surgery with 30° endoscopes represents an emerging option to standard microsurgical techniques for transoral approaches to the anterior CVJ. This approach should be considered as complementary rather than an alternative to the traditional microsurgical transoral-transpharyngeal approach. Conclusions: The transoral approach with sparing of the soft palate still remains the gold standard compared with the pure transnasal and transcervical approaches because of the wider working channel provided by the former technique. The transnasal endoscopic approach alone appears to be superior when the CVJ lesion exceeds the upper limit of the inferior third of the clivus.

KW - Craniovertebral junction

KW - Transcervical approach

KW - Transnasal approach

KW - Transoral approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041314919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041314919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.125

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.125

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 544

EP - 557

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

ER -