Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: What makes them succeed?

Marie Pascale Pomey, Pierre Gerlier Forest, Claudia Sanmartin, Carolyn De Coster, Madeleine Drew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To assess experts' perceptions of the contextual and local factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of waiting time management strategies (WTMS) in Canadian healthcare organizations. Methods: We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews and one focus group with individuals involved in WTMS at the federal, provincial or organizational level. Results: The most frequently cited local factor was physicians' participation. Physicians' leadership made the greatest difference in bringing resistant physicians on board. To be effective, however, local leadership had to be supported by senior management. Alignment of financial incentives between the contextual and local levels was also frequently cited, and interviewees stressed the importance of tools used to design, monitor, evaluate and prioritize WTMS. Conclusions: Finding the right balance between supportive resources and tools and an effective management system is a tough challenge. But achieving this balance will help reconcile contradictions between top-down and bottom-up WTMS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-81
Number of pages16
JournalHealthcare Policy
Volume5
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Time Management
Physicians
Focus Groups
Motivation
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Pomey, M. P., Forest, P. G., Sanmartin, C., De Coster, C., & Drew, M. (2010). Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: What makes them succeed? Healthcare Policy, 5(3), 66-81.

Wait time management strategies for scheduled care : What makes them succeed? / Pomey, Marie Pascale; Forest, Pierre Gerlier; Sanmartin, Claudia; De Coster, Carolyn; Drew, Madeleine.

In: Healthcare Policy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, p. 66-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pomey, MP, Forest, PG, Sanmartin, C, De Coster, C & Drew, M 2010, 'Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: What makes them succeed?', Healthcare Policy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 66-81.
Pomey MP, Forest PG, Sanmartin C, De Coster C, Drew M. Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: What makes them succeed? Healthcare Policy. 2010;5(3):66-81.
Pomey, Marie Pascale ; Forest, Pierre Gerlier ; Sanmartin, Claudia ; De Coster, Carolyn ; Drew, Madeleine. / Wait time management strategies for scheduled care : What makes them succeed?. In: Healthcare Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 66-81.
@article{28b2ce5304dc4393b295bcf2ba8f6730,
title = "Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: What makes them succeed?",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess experts' perceptions of the contextual and local factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of waiting time management strategies (WTMS) in Canadian healthcare organizations. Methods: We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews and one focus group with individuals involved in WTMS at the federal, provincial or organizational level. Results: The most frequently cited local factor was physicians' participation. Physicians' leadership made the greatest difference in bringing resistant physicians on board. To be effective, however, local leadership had to be supported by senior management. Alignment of financial incentives between the contextual and local levels was also frequently cited, and interviewees stressed the importance of tools used to design, monitor, evaluate and prioritize WTMS. Conclusions: Finding the right balance between supportive resources and tools and an effective management system is a tough challenge. But achieving this balance will help reconcile contradictions between top-down and bottom-up WTMS.",
author = "Pomey, {Marie Pascale} and Forest, {Pierre Gerlier} and Claudia Sanmartin and {De Coster}, Carolyn and Madeleine Drew",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "66--81",
journal = "Healthcare Policy",
issn = "1715-6572",
publisher = "Longwoods Publishing Corp.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wait time management strategies for scheduled care

T2 - What makes them succeed?

AU - Pomey, Marie Pascale

AU - Forest, Pierre Gerlier

AU - Sanmartin, Claudia

AU - De Coster, Carolyn

AU - Drew, Madeleine

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objectives: To assess experts' perceptions of the contextual and local factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of waiting time management strategies (WTMS) in Canadian healthcare organizations. Methods: We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews and one focus group with individuals involved in WTMS at the federal, provincial or organizational level. Results: The most frequently cited local factor was physicians' participation. Physicians' leadership made the greatest difference in bringing resistant physicians on board. To be effective, however, local leadership had to be supported by senior management. Alignment of financial incentives between the contextual and local levels was also frequently cited, and interviewees stressed the importance of tools used to design, monitor, evaluate and prioritize WTMS. Conclusions: Finding the right balance between supportive resources and tools and an effective management system is a tough challenge. But achieving this balance will help reconcile contradictions between top-down and bottom-up WTMS.

AB - Objectives: To assess experts' perceptions of the contextual and local factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of waiting time management strategies (WTMS) in Canadian healthcare organizations. Methods: We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews and one focus group with individuals involved in WTMS at the federal, provincial or organizational level. Results: The most frequently cited local factor was physicians' participation. Physicians' leadership made the greatest difference in bringing resistant physicians on board. To be effective, however, local leadership had to be supported by senior management. Alignment of financial incentives between the contextual and local levels was also frequently cited, and interviewees stressed the importance of tools used to design, monitor, evaluate and prioritize WTMS. Conclusions: Finding the right balance between supportive resources and tools and an effective management system is a tough challenge. But achieving this balance will help reconcile contradictions between top-down and bottom-up WTMS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950663234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950663234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21286269

AN - SCOPUS:77950663234

VL - 5

SP - 66

EP - 81

JO - Healthcare Policy

JF - Healthcare Policy

SN - 1715-6572

IS - 3

ER -