Freiwilliges Peer Review als innovatives Instrument zur Qualitätsverbesserung auf der Intensivstation – eine retrospektive deskriptive Kohortenstudie auf deutschen Intensivstationen

Translated title of the contribution: Voluntary peer review as innovative tool for quality improvement in the intensive care unit – a retrospective descriptive cohort study in German intensive care units

Oliver Kumpf, Frank Bloos, Hanswerner Bause, Alexander Brinkmann, Maria Deja, Gernot Marx, Arnold Kaltwasser, Rolf Dubb, Elke Muhl, Clemens A. Greim, Norbert Weiler, Ines Chop, Günther Jonitz, Henning Schaefer, Matthias Felsenstein, Ursula Liebeskind, Carsten Leffmann, Annemarie Jungbluth, Christian Waydhas, Peter PronovostClaudia Spies, Jan Peter Braun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Quality improvement and safety in intensive care are rapidly evolving topics. However, there is no gold standard for assessing quality improvement in intensive care medicine yet. In 2007 a pilot project in German intensive care units (ICUs) started using voluntary peer reviews as an innovative tool for quality assessment and improvement. We describe the method of voluntary peer review and assessed its feasibility by evaluating anonymized peer review reports and analysed the thematic clusters highlighted in these reports.

Methods: Retrospective data analysis from 22 anonymous reports of peer reviews. All ICUs – representing over 300 patient beds – had undergone voluntary peer review. Data were retrieved from reports of peers of the review teams and representatives of visited ICUs. Data were analysed with regard to number of topics addressed and results of assessment questionnaires. Reports of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT reports) of these ICUs are presented.

Results: External assessment of structure, process and outcome indicators revealed high percentages of adherence to predefined quality goals. In the SWOT reports 11 main thematic clusters were identified representative for common ICUs. 58.1% of mentioned topics covered personnel issues, team and communication issues as well as organisation and treatment standards. The most mentioned weaknesses were observed in the issues documentation/reporting, hygiene and ethics. We identified several unique patterns regarding quality in the ICU of which long-term personnel problems und lack of good reporting methods were most interesting

Conclusion: Voluntary peer review could be established as a feasible and valuable tool for quality improvement. Peer reports addressed common areas of interest in intensive care medicine in more detail compared to other methods like measurement of quality indicators.

Translated title of the contributionVoluntary peer review as innovative tool for quality improvement in the intensive care unit – a retrospective descriptive cohort study in German intensive care units
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalGMS German Medical Science
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2014

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Patient safety
  • Peer review
  • Quality improvement
  • Quality management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary peer review as innovative tool for quality improvement in the intensive care unit – a retrospective descriptive cohort study in German intensive care units'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kumpf, O., Bloos, F., Bause, H., Brinkmann, A., Deja, M., Marx, G., Kaltwasser, A., Dubb, R., Muhl, E., Greim, C. A., Weiler, N., Chop, I., Jonitz, G., Schaefer, H., Felsenstein, M., Liebeskind, U., Leffmann, C., Jungbluth, A., Waydhas, C., ... Braun, J. P. (2014). Freiwilliges Peer Review als innovatives Instrument zur Qualitätsverbesserung auf der Intensivstation – eine retrospektive deskriptive Kohortenstudie auf deutschen Intensivstationen. GMS German Medical Science, 12, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3205/000202