Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise

Sabyasachi Roy, Cory T. Miller, Dane Gottsch, Xiaoqin Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The natural environment is inherently noisy with acoustic interferences. It is, therefore, beneficial for a species to modify its vocal production to effectively communicate in the presence of interfering noises. Non-human primates have been traditionally considered to possess limited voluntary vocal control, but little is known about their ability to modify vocal behavior when encountering interfering noises. Here we tested the ability of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) to control the initiation of vocalizations and maintain vocal interactions between pairs in an acoustic environment in which the length and predictability (periodic or random aperiodic occurrences) of interfering noise bursts were varied. Despite the presence of interfering noise, the marmosets continued to engage in antiphonal calling behavior. Results showed that the overwhelming majority of calls were initiated during silence gaps even when the length of the silence gap following each noise burst was unpredictable. During the periodic noise conditions, as the length of the silence gap decreased, the latency between the end of noise burst and call onset decreased significantly. In contrast, when presented with aperiodic noise bursts, the marmosets chose to call predominantly during long (4 and 8?s) over short (2?s) silence gaps. In the 8?s periodic noise conditions, a marmoset pair either initiated both calls of an antiphonal exchange within the same silence gap or exchanged calls in two consecutive silence gaps. Our findings provide compelling evidence that common marmosets are capable of modifying their vocal production according to the dynamics of their acoustic environment during vocal communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3619-3629
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume214
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Callithrix
Callithrix jacchus
Noise
Callitrichidae
Acoustics
acoustics
Aptitude
calling behavior
vocalization
primate
animal communication
Primates
Communication
communication

Keywords

  • Antiphonal call
  • Auditory feedback
  • Marmoset
  • Phee call
  • Vocal control
  • Vocal onset
  • Vocalization
  • White noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Insect Science
  • Aquatic Science

Cite this

Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise. / Roy, Sabyasachi; Miller, Cory T.; Gottsch, Dane; Wang, Xiaoqin.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 214, No. 21, 11.2011, p. 3619-3629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roy, Sabyasachi ; Miller, Cory T. ; Gottsch, Dane ; Wang, Xiaoqin. / Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise. In: Journal of Experimental Biology. 2011 ; Vol. 214, No. 21. pp. 3619-3629.
@article{f64bc401e1b5401a9b8c526cf25cf56d,
title = "Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise",
abstract = "The natural environment is inherently noisy with acoustic interferences. It is, therefore, beneficial for a species to modify its vocal production to effectively communicate in the presence of interfering noises. Non-human primates have been traditionally considered to possess limited voluntary vocal control, but little is known about their ability to modify vocal behavior when encountering interfering noises. Here we tested the ability of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) to control the initiation of vocalizations and maintain vocal interactions between pairs in an acoustic environment in which the length and predictability (periodic or random aperiodic occurrences) of interfering noise bursts were varied. Despite the presence of interfering noise, the marmosets continued to engage in antiphonal calling behavior. Results showed that the overwhelming majority of calls were initiated during silence gaps even when the length of the silence gap following each noise burst was unpredictable. During the periodic noise conditions, as the length of the silence gap decreased, the latency between the end of noise burst and call onset decreased significantly. In contrast, when presented with aperiodic noise bursts, the marmosets chose to call predominantly during long (4 and 8?s) over short (2?s) silence gaps. In the 8?s periodic noise conditions, a marmoset pair either initiated both calls of an antiphonal exchange within the same silence gap or exchanged calls in two consecutive silence gaps. Our findings provide compelling evidence that common marmosets are capable of modifying their vocal production according to the dynamics of their acoustic environment during vocal communication.",
keywords = "Antiphonal call, Auditory feedback, Marmoset, Phee call, Vocal control, Vocal onset, Vocalization, White noise",
author = "Sabyasachi Roy and Miller, {Cory T.} and Dane Gottsch and Xiaoqin Wang",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.056101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "214",
pages = "3619--3629",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise

AU - Roy, Sabyasachi

AU - Miller, Cory T.

AU - Gottsch, Dane

AU - Wang, Xiaoqin

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - The natural environment is inherently noisy with acoustic interferences. It is, therefore, beneficial for a species to modify its vocal production to effectively communicate in the presence of interfering noises. Non-human primates have been traditionally considered to possess limited voluntary vocal control, but little is known about their ability to modify vocal behavior when encountering interfering noises. Here we tested the ability of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) to control the initiation of vocalizations and maintain vocal interactions between pairs in an acoustic environment in which the length and predictability (periodic or random aperiodic occurrences) of interfering noise bursts were varied. Despite the presence of interfering noise, the marmosets continued to engage in antiphonal calling behavior. Results showed that the overwhelming majority of calls were initiated during silence gaps even when the length of the silence gap following each noise burst was unpredictable. During the periodic noise conditions, as the length of the silence gap decreased, the latency between the end of noise burst and call onset decreased significantly. In contrast, when presented with aperiodic noise bursts, the marmosets chose to call predominantly during long (4 and 8?s) over short (2?s) silence gaps. In the 8?s periodic noise conditions, a marmoset pair either initiated both calls of an antiphonal exchange within the same silence gap or exchanged calls in two consecutive silence gaps. Our findings provide compelling evidence that common marmosets are capable of modifying their vocal production according to the dynamics of their acoustic environment during vocal communication.

AB - The natural environment is inherently noisy with acoustic interferences. It is, therefore, beneficial for a species to modify its vocal production to effectively communicate in the presence of interfering noises. Non-human primates have been traditionally considered to possess limited voluntary vocal control, but little is known about their ability to modify vocal behavior when encountering interfering noises. Here we tested the ability of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) to control the initiation of vocalizations and maintain vocal interactions between pairs in an acoustic environment in which the length and predictability (periodic or random aperiodic occurrences) of interfering noise bursts were varied. Despite the presence of interfering noise, the marmosets continued to engage in antiphonal calling behavior. Results showed that the overwhelming majority of calls were initiated during silence gaps even when the length of the silence gap following each noise burst was unpredictable. During the periodic noise conditions, as the length of the silence gap decreased, the latency between the end of noise burst and call onset decreased significantly. In contrast, when presented with aperiodic noise bursts, the marmosets chose to call predominantly during long (4 and 8?s) over short (2?s) silence gaps. In the 8?s periodic noise conditions, a marmoset pair either initiated both calls of an antiphonal exchange within the same silence gap or exchanged calls in two consecutive silence gaps. Our findings provide compelling evidence that common marmosets are capable of modifying their vocal production according to the dynamics of their acoustic environment during vocal communication.

KW - Antiphonal call

KW - Auditory feedback

KW - Marmoset

KW - Phee call

KW - Vocal control

KW - Vocal onset

KW - Vocalization

KW - White noise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054708449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054708449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.056101

DO - 10.1242/jeb.056101

M3 - Article

VL - 214

SP - 3619

EP - 3629

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 21

ER -