Visual memories from nonvisual experiences

Amy L. Shelton, Timothy P. McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many common activities rely on spatial knowledge acquired from nonvisual modalities. We investigated the nature of this knowledge by having people look at a collection of objects on a desk-top and manually reconstruct their arrangement, without vision, as though the display had been rotated 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, or 180° relative to the view they could see. Performance on several measures of visual-spatial memory showed that participants had better visual memory for the view they had manually reconstructed than for the view they had studied visually for several minutes. These findings provide compelling new evidence that visual-spatial knowledge of very high fidelity can be acquired from nonvisual modalities, and reveal how visual and nonvisual spatial information may even be confused in the brain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Science
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain
Spatial Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Visual memories from nonvisual experiences. Psychological Science, 12(4), 343-347.

Visual memories from nonvisual experiences. / Shelton, Amy L.; McNamara, Timothy P.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, 07.2001, p. 343-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shelton, AL & McNamara, TP 2001, 'Visual memories from nonvisual experiences', Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 343-347.
Shelton AL, McNamara TP. Visual memories from nonvisual experiences. Psychological Science. 2001 Jul;12(4):343-347.
Shelton, Amy L. ; McNamara, Timothy P. / Visual memories from nonvisual experiences. In: Psychological Science. 2001 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 343-347.
@article{bc567f00d0a6428b875d07109d86f243,
title = "Visual memories from nonvisual experiences",
abstract = "Many common activities rely on spatial knowledge acquired from nonvisual modalities. We investigated the nature of this knowledge by having people look at a collection of objects on a desk-top and manually reconstruct their arrangement, without vision, as though the display had been rotated 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, or 180° relative to the view they could see. Performance on several measures of visual-spatial memory showed that participants had better visual memory for the view they had manually reconstructed than for the view they had studied visually for several minutes. These findings provide compelling new evidence that visual-spatial knowledge of very high fidelity can be acquired from nonvisual modalities, and reveal how visual and nonvisual spatial information may even be confused in the brain.",
author = "Shelton, {Amy L.} and McNamara, {Timothy P.}",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "343--347",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual memories from nonvisual experiences

AU - Shelton, Amy L.

AU - McNamara, Timothy P.

PY - 2001/7

Y1 - 2001/7

N2 - Many common activities rely on spatial knowledge acquired from nonvisual modalities. We investigated the nature of this knowledge by having people look at a collection of objects on a desk-top and manually reconstruct their arrangement, without vision, as though the display had been rotated 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, or 180° relative to the view they could see. Performance on several measures of visual-spatial memory showed that participants had better visual memory for the view they had manually reconstructed than for the view they had studied visually for several minutes. These findings provide compelling new evidence that visual-spatial knowledge of very high fidelity can be acquired from nonvisual modalities, and reveal how visual and nonvisual spatial information may even be confused in the brain.

AB - Many common activities rely on spatial knowledge acquired from nonvisual modalities. We investigated the nature of this knowledge by having people look at a collection of objects on a desk-top and manually reconstruct their arrangement, without vision, as though the display had been rotated 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, or 180° relative to the view they could see. Performance on several measures of visual-spatial memory showed that participants had better visual memory for the view they had manually reconstructed than for the view they had studied visually for several minutes. These findings provide compelling new evidence that visual-spatial knowledge of very high fidelity can be acquired from nonvisual modalities, and reveal how visual and nonvisual spatial information may even be confused in the brain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035406484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035406484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11476104

AN - SCOPUS:0035406484

VL - 12

SP - 343

EP - 347

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 4

ER -