Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and objectively measured balance in the united states

Jeffrey R. Willis, Susan E. Vitale, Yuri Agrawal, Pradeep Ramulu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Further research is crucial to better understand the reason for falls in individuals with visual impairment (VI) and to develop appropriate fall prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE To compare balance measures in individuals with normal vision, VI, and uncorrected refractive error (URE). DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study based on a national survey sample. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4590 adults, 40 years or older, participating in the 2001 through 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed tests of standing balance with eyes open or eyes closed on a firm or compliant (foam) surface. Eyes-closed testing on a foam surface primarily assessed vestibular balance by minimizing visual and proprioceptive inputs. The main outcome measure was time to balance failure on firm and foam surface testing. Participants also self-reported difficulty with falling during the last year. RESULTS Failure during eyes-open balance testing conditions or eyes-closed balance testing on a firm surface was not more common among participants with VI-associated or URE-associated vision loss (P <.22). In eyes-closed foam surface balance testing, multivariable models demonstrated higher rates of balance loss with VI-associated vision loss (P = .02) and with URE-associated vision loss (P = .04) (hazard ratio, 1.7 per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] unit change [10 lines] for both). Self-reported falling difficulty was associated with worse VI (odds ratio, 3.7 per logMAR unit change; P = .03) but not with worse URE (odds ratio, 3.4 per logMAR unit change; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The vestibular contribution to balance (measured with eyes closed on a foam surface) was worse for individuals with VI or URE. Reduced visual inputs may weaken the vestibulo-ocular reflex, an important system that maintains the effectiveness of vestibular balance. Alternately, common degenerative pathways or lower physical activity levels may affect balance, particularly among those with VI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1049-1056
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Ophthalmology
Volume131
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Vision Disorders
Odds Ratio
Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex
Nutrition Surveys
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and objectively measured balance in the united states. / Willis, Jeffrey R.; Vitale, Susan E.; Agrawal, Yuri; Ramulu, Pradeep.

In: JAMA Ophthalmology, Vol. 131, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 1049-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cf8d9975369447f97df21acf9f5927c,
title = "Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and objectively measured balance in the united states",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Further research is crucial to better understand the reason for falls in individuals with visual impairment (VI) and to develop appropriate fall prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE To compare balance measures in individuals with normal vision, VI, and uncorrected refractive error (URE). DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study based on a national survey sample. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4590 adults, 40 years or older, participating in the 2001 through 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed tests of standing balance with eyes open or eyes closed on a firm or compliant (foam) surface. Eyes-closed testing on a foam surface primarily assessed vestibular balance by minimizing visual and proprioceptive inputs. The main outcome measure was time to balance failure on firm and foam surface testing. Participants also self-reported difficulty with falling during the last year. RESULTS Failure during eyes-open balance testing conditions or eyes-closed balance testing on a firm surface was not more common among participants with VI-associated or URE-associated vision loss (P <.22). In eyes-closed foam surface balance testing, multivariable models demonstrated higher rates of balance loss with VI-associated vision loss (P = .02) and with URE-associated vision loss (P = .04) (hazard ratio, 1.7 per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] unit change [10 lines] for both). Self-reported falling difficulty was associated with worse VI (odds ratio, 3.7 per logMAR unit change; P = .03) but not with worse URE (odds ratio, 3.4 per logMAR unit change; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The vestibular contribution to balance (measured with eyes closed on a foam surface) was worse for individuals with VI or URE. Reduced visual inputs may weaken the vestibulo-ocular reflex, an important system that maintains the effectiveness of vestibular balance. Alternately, common degenerative pathways or lower physical activity levels may affect balance, particularly among those with VI.",
author = "Willis, {Jeffrey R.} and Vitale, {Susan E.} and Yuri Agrawal and Pradeep Ramulu",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.316",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "1049--1056",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and objectively measured balance in the united states

AU - Willis, Jeffrey R.

AU - Vitale, Susan E.

AU - Agrawal, Yuri

AU - Ramulu, Pradeep

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - IMPORTANCE Further research is crucial to better understand the reason for falls in individuals with visual impairment (VI) and to develop appropriate fall prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE To compare balance measures in individuals with normal vision, VI, and uncorrected refractive error (URE). DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study based on a national survey sample. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4590 adults, 40 years or older, participating in the 2001 through 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed tests of standing balance with eyes open or eyes closed on a firm or compliant (foam) surface. Eyes-closed testing on a foam surface primarily assessed vestibular balance by minimizing visual and proprioceptive inputs. The main outcome measure was time to balance failure on firm and foam surface testing. Participants also self-reported difficulty with falling during the last year. RESULTS Failure during eyes-open balance testing conditions or eyes-closed balance testing on a firm surface was not more common among participants with VI-associated or URE-associated vision loss (P <.22). In eyes-closed foam surface balance testing, multivariable models demonstrated higher rates of balance loss with VI-associated vision loss (P = .02) and with URE-associated vision loss (P = .04) (hazard ratio, 1.7 per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] unit change [10 lines] for both). Self-reported falling difficulty was associated with worse VI (odds ratio, 3.7 per logMAR unit change; P = .03) but not with worse URE (odds ratio, 3.4 per logMAR unit change; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The vestibular contribution to balance (measured with eyes closed on a foam surface) was worse for individuals with VI or URE. Reduced visual inputs may weaken the vestibulo-ocular reflex, an important system that maintains the effectiveness of vestibular balance. Alternately, common degenerative pathways or lower physical activity levels may affect balance, particularly among those with VI.

AB - IMPORTANCE Further research is crucial to better understand the reason for falls in individuals with visual impairment (VI) and to develop appropriate fall prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE To compare balance measures in individuals with normal vision, VI, and uncorrected refractive error (URE). DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study based on a national survey sample. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4590 adults, 40 years or older, participating in the 2001 through 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed tests of standing balance with eyes open or eyes closed on a firm or compliant (foam) surface. Eyes-closed testing on a foam surface primarily assessed vestibular balance by minimizing visual and proprioceptive inputs. The main outcome measure was time to balance failure on firm and foam surface testing. Participants also self-reported difficulty with falling during the last year. RESULTS Failure during eyes-open balance testing conditions or eyes-closed balance testing on a firm surface was not more common among participants with VI-associated or URE-associated vision loss (P <.22). In eyes-closed foam surface balance testing, multivariable models demonstrated higher rates of balance loss with VI-associated vision loss (P = .02) and with URE-associated vision loss (P = .04) (hazard ratio, 1.7 per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] unit change [10 lines] for both). Self-reported falling difficulty was associated with worse VI (odds ratio, 3.7 per logMAR unit change; P = .03) but not with worse URE (odds ratio, 3.4 per logMAR unit change; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The vestibular contribution to balance (measured with eyes closed on a foam surface) was worse for individuals with VI or URE. Reduced visual inputs may weaken the vestibulo-ocular reflex, an important system that maintains the effectiveness of vestibular balance. Alternately, common degenerative pathways or lower physical activity levels may affect balance, particularly among those with VI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881627930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881627930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.316

DO - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.316

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 1049

EP - 1056

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 8

ER -