Visual disability variables. I: The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients

Robert W Massof, Cynthia T. Hsu, Frank H. Baker, G. David Barnett, William L. Park, James T Deremeik, Carol Rainey, Cathy Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To test the validity and reliability of latent trait measures estimated from ratings by low-vision patients of the importance and difficulty of selected activity goals. Design: Validation of a telephone-administered functional assessment instrument using Rasch analysis of self-assessment ratings. Setting: Telephone interviews of respondents in their homes. Participants: Consecutive series of 600 outpatients with low vision. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Ratings of the importance and difficulty of achieving 41 activity goals. Person and item traits were measured with the Andrich rating scale model. Measurement validity and reliability were tested statistically by comparing response patterns and distributions with measurement model expectations. Results: Patients could distinguish only 3 categories of importance and 4 categories of difficulty. The distributions of person and item measure fit statistics were consistent with 2 unidimensional constructs: value of independence estimated from importance ratings and visual ability estimated from difficulty ratings. However, 8 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of value of independence and 7 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of visual ability. Person measure distributions could be divided into 3 statistically distinct strata for estimates from both importance ratings and difficulty ratings. Item measure distributions could be divided into 21 strata for estimates from importance ratings and 7 strata for estimates from difficulty ratings. Conclusions: The 2 variables that define visual disability - value of independence and visual ability - are valid constructs that can be estimated accurately and reliably from patient ratings of the importance and difficulty of activity goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)946-953
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Low Vision
Aptitude
Reproducibility of Results
Telephone
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews

Keywords

  • Questionnaires
  • Rehabilitation
  • Vision, low

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Visual disability variables. I : The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients. / Massof, Robert W; Hsu, Cynthia T.; Baker, Frank H.; Barnett, G. David; Park, William L.; Deremeik, James T; Rainey, Carol; Epstein, Cathy.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 86, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 946-953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Massof, Robert W ; Hsu, Cynthia T. ; Baker, Frank H. ; Barnett, G. David ; Park, William L. ; Deremeik, James T ; Rainey, Carol ; Epstein, Cathy. / Visual disability variables. I : The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 86, No. 5. pp. 946-953.
@article{24cd256d5d69471f9ca8eb571f7a4407,
title = "Visual disability variables. I: The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients",
abstract = "Objective: To test the validity and reliability of latent trait measures estimated from ratings by low-vision patients of the importance and difficulty of selected activity goals. Design: Validation of a telephone-administered functional assessment instrument using Rasch analysis of self-assessment ratings. Setting: Telephone interviews of respondents in their homes. Participants: Consecutive series of 600 outpatients with low vision. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Ratings of the importance and difficulty of achieving 41 activity goals. Person and item traits were measured with the Andrich rating scale model. Measurement validity and reliability were tested statistically by comparing response patterns and distributions with measurement model expectations. Results: Patients could distinguish only 3 categories of importance and 4 categories of difficulty. The distributions of person and item measure fit statistics were consistent with 2 unidimensional constructs: value of independence estimated from importance ratings and visual ability estimated from difficulty ratings. However, 8 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of value of independence and 7 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of visual ability. Person measure distributions could be divided into 3 statistically distinct strata for estimates from both importance ratings and difficulty ratings. Item measure distributions could be divided into 21 strata for estimates from importance ratings and 7 strata for estimates from difficulty ratings. Conclusions: The 2 variables that define visual disability - value of independence and visual ability - are valid constructs that can be estimated accurately and reliably from patient ratings of the importance and difficulty of activity goals.",
keywords = "Questionnaires, Rehabilitation, Vision, low",
author = "Massof, {Robert W} and Hsu, {Cynthia T.} and Baker, {Frank H.} and Barnett, {G. David} and Park, {William L.} and Deremeik, {James T} and Carol Rainey and Cathy Epstein",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "946--953",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual disability variables. I

T2 - The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients

AU - Massof, Robert W

AU - Hsu, Cynthia T.

AU - Baker, Frank H.

AU - Barnett, G. David

AU - Park, William L.

AU - Deremeik, James T

AU - Rainey, Carol

AU - Epstein, Cathy

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Objective: To test the validity and reliability of latent trait measures estimated from ratings by low-vision patients of the importance and difficulty of selected activity goals. Design: Validation of a telephone-administered functional assessment instrument using Rasch analysis of self-assessment ratings. Setting: Telephone interviews of respondents in their homes. Participants: Consecutive series of 600 outpatients with low vision. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Ratings of the importance and difficulty of achieving 41 activity goals. Person and item traits were measured with the Andrich rating scale model. Measurement validity and reliability were tested statistically by comparing response patterns and distributions with measurement model expectations. Results: Patients could distinguish only 3 categories of importance and 4 categories of difficulty. The distributions of person and item measure fit statistics were consistent with 2 unidimensional constructs: value of independence estimated from importance ratings and visual ability estimated from difficulty ratings. However, 8 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of value of independence and 7 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of visual ability. Person measure distributions could be divided into 3 statistically distinct strata for estimates from both importance ratings and difficulty ratings. Item measure distributions could be divided into 21 strata for estimates from importance ratings and 7 strata for estimates from difficulty ratings. Conclusions: The 2 variables that define visual disability - value of independence and visual ability - are valid constructs that can be estimated accurately and reliably from patient ratings of the importance and difficulty of activity goals.

AB - Objective: To test the validity and reliability of latent trait measures estimated from ratings by low-vision patients of the importance and difficulty of selected activity goals. Design: Validation of a telephone-administered functional assessment instrument using Rasch analysis of self-assessment ratings. Setting: Telephone interviews of respondents in their homes. Participants: Consecutive series of 600 outpatients with low vision. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Ratings of the importance and difficulty of achieving 41 activity goals. Person and item traits were measured with the Andrich rating scale model. Measurement validity and reliability were tested statistically by comparing response patterns and distributions with measurement model expectations. Results: Patients could distinguish only 3 categories of importance and 4 categories of difficulty. The distributions of person and item measure fit statistics were consistent with 2 unidimensional constructs: value of independence estimated from importance ratings and visual ability estimated from difficulty ratings. However, 8 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of value of independence and 7 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of visual ability. Person measure distributions could be divided into 3 statistically distinct strata for estimates from both importance ratings and difficulty ratings. Item measure distributions could be divided into 21 strata for estimates from importance ratings and 7 strata for estimates from difficulty ratings. Conclusions: The 2 variables that define visual disability - value of independence and visual ability - are valid constructs that can be estimated accurately and reliably from patient ratings of the importance and difficulty of activity goals.

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Vision, low

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844377163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844377163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 15895341

AN - SCOPUS:18844377163

VL - 86

SP - 946

EP - 953

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 5

ER -