Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms.

Gary D Walford, L. S. Kim, M. E. Miller, S. E. Mitchell, G. D. Walford, A. S. Dobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine and compare the intra- and interobserver variability of visual and computerized assessment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) severity from lower extremity angiograms, and to correlate quantitative angiographic measures with clinical predictors of PAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral angiograms of 13 segments from the ilio-femoral-popliteal system were evaluated on two separate occasions by nine radiologists and with a quantitative computerized method. In a separate study, images from 18 patients undergoing diagnostic lower extremity angiography were analyzed with use of quantitative angiography and the results were compared with clinical and lipid risk factors. RESULTS: The data demonstrate that computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms is associated with lower intra- and interobserver variability than visual assessment of the same films. Despite this, there was excellent intraobserver and good interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of a severe lesion with visual assessment. Quantitative computerized measures of disease severity correlate with several known predictors of large vessel PAD. CONCLUSION: Computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms may be a useful tool in the clinical and investigational evaluation of PAD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-602
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume5
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angiography
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Observer Variation
Lower Extremity
Thigh
Lipids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms. / Walford, Gary D; Kim, L. S.; Miller, M. E.; Mitchell, S. E.; Walford, G. D.; Dobs, A. S.

In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 07.1994, p. 595-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walford, Gary D ; Kim, L. S. ; Miller, M. E. ; Mitchell, S. E. ; Walford, G. D. ; Dobs, A. S. / Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms. In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 1994 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 595-602.
@article{9e7e0058a39c4d12bda0432d7b1083fc,
title = "Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine and compare the intra- and interobserver variability of visual and computerized assessment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) severity from lower extremity angiograms, and to correlate quantitative angiographic measures with clinical predictors of PAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral angiograms of 13 segments from the ilio-femoral-popliteal system were evaluated on two separate occasions by nine radiologists and with a quantitative computerized method. In a separate study, images from 18 patients undergoing diagnostic lower extremity angiography were analyzed with use of quantitative angiography and the results were compared with clinical and lipid risk factors. RESULTS: The data demonstrate that computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms is associated with lower intra- and interobserver variability than visual assessment of the same films. Despite this, there was excellent intraobserver and good interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of a severe lesion with visual assessment. Quantitative computerized measures of disease severity correlate with several known predictors of large vessel PAD. CONCLUSION: Computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms may be a useful tool in the clinical and investigational evaluation of PAD.",
author = "Walford, {Gary D} and Kim, {L. S.} and Miller, {M. E.} and Mitchell, {S. E.} and Walford, {G. D.} and Dobs, {A. S.}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "595--602",
journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1051-0443",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms.

AU - Walford, Gary D

AU - Kim, L. S.

AU - Miller, M. E.

AU - Mitchell, S. E.

AU - Walford, G. D.

AU - Dobs, A. S.

PY - 1994/7

Y1 - 1994/7

N2 - PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine and compare the intra- and interobserver variability of visual and computerized assessment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) severity from lower extremity angiograms, and to correlate quantitative angiographic measures with clinical predictors of PAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral angiograms of 13 segments from the ilio-femoral-popliteal system were evaluated on two separate occasions by nine radiologists and with a quantitative computerized method. In a separate study, images from 18 patients undergoing diagnostic lower extremity angiography were analyzed with use of quantitative angiography and the results were compared with clinical and lipid risk factors. RESULTS: The data demonstrate that computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms is associated with lower intra- and interobserver variability than visual assessment of the same films. Despite this, there was excellent intraobserver and good interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of a severe lesion with visual assessment. Quantitative computerized measures of disease severity correlate with several known predictors of large vessel PAD. CONCLUSION: Computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms may be a useful tool in the clinical and investigational evaluation of PAD.

AB - PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine and compare the intra- and interobserver variability of visual and computerized assessment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) severity from lower extremity angiograms, and to correlate quantitative angiographic measures with clinical predictors of PAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral angiograms of 13 segments from the ilio-femoral-popliteal system were evaluated on two separate occasions by nine radiologists and with a quantitative computerized method. In a separate study, images from 18 patients undergoing diagnostic lower extremity angiography were analyzed with use of quantitative angiography and the results were compared with clinical and lipid risk factors. RESULTS: The data demonstrate that computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms is associated with lower intra- and interobserver variability than visual assessment of the same films. Despite this, there was excellent intraobserver and good interobserver agreement on the presence or absence of a severe lesion with visual assessment. Quantitative computerized measures of disease severity correlate with several known predictors of large vessel PAD. CONCLUSION: Computerized assessment of peripheral angiograms may be a useful tool in the clinical and investigational evaluation of PAD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028469306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028469306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 595

EP - 602

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 4

ER -