Visual acuity norms in young children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3-6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice-up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right-rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-92
Number of pages9
JournalSurvey of Ophthalmology
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Matched-Pair Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • children's vision
  • human visual development
  • optotype
  • pseudo-optotype
  • surrounded optotype
  • vision testing
  • visual acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Visual acuity norms in young children. / Simons, Kurt A.

In: Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1983, p. 84-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f41cfcdcd6d45d1a0a3e36d6b0954b9,
title = "Visual acuity norms in young children",
abstract = "There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3-6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice-up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right-rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.",
keywords = "children's vision, human visual development, optotype, pseudo-optotype, surrounded optotype, vision testing, visual acuity",
author = "Simons, {Kurt A.}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1016/0039-6257(83)90076-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "84--92",
journal = "Survey of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0039-6257",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual acuity norms in young children

AU - Simons, Kurt A.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3-6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice-up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right-rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.

AB - There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3-6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice-up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right-rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.

KW - children's vision

KW - human visual development

KW - optotype

KW - pseudo-optotype

KW - surrounded optotype

KW - vision testing

KW - visual acuity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021065267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021065267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0039-6257(83)90076-0

DO - 10.1016/0039-6257(83)90076-0

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 84

EP - 92

JO - Survey of Ophthalmology

JF - Survey of Ophthalmology

SN - 0039-6257

IS - 2

ER -