Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants

Nicholas R. Mahoney; Michelle Y. Peng; Shannath L. Merbs; Michael P. Grant

doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700

Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants

Nicholas R. Mahoney, Michelle Y. Peng, Shannath L. Merbs, Michael P. Grant

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usage of preoperative digital anatomic implant evaluation in internal orbital fractures. Methods: An IRB-approved review of cases of orbital fracture repair was conducted and cases where digital implant modeling was performed were selected for comprehensive review. The surgical time of these cases was also compared with surgeon and implant matched controls. Results: A total of 25 patients and 26 orbits underwent preoperative virtual fitting and were reviewed. There were no complications or revision surgeries needed. Postoperative assessment demonstrated accuracy to the preoperative target with an average maximum deviation of 1.9 mm. Conclusions: Preoperative digital fracture assessment, implant manufacturer and size selection, and virtual cutting guide creation provides additional tools for orbital surgeons to achieve anatomic restoration without significant differences in operating time.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	196-201
Number of pages	6
Journal	Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume	33
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700
State	Published - May 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ophthalmology
Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700

Cite this

@article{b7acccdb6ee5499b8cc3dae50aa1f37b,

title = "Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants",

abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the usage of preoperative digital anatomic implant evaluation in internal orbital fractures. Methods: An IRB-approved review of cases of orbital fracture repair was conducted and cases where digital implant modeling was performed were selected for comprehensive review. The surgical time of these cases was also compared with surgeon and implant matched controls. Results: A total of 25 patients and 26 orbits underwent preoperative virtual fitting and were reviewed. There were no complications or revision surgeries needed. Postoperative assessment demonstrated accuracy to the preoperative target with an average maximum deviation of 1.9 mm. Conclusions: Preoperative digital fracture assessment, implant manufacturer and size selection, and virtual cutting guide creation provides additional tools for orbital surgeons to achieve anatomic restoration without significant differences in operating time.",

author = "Mahoney, {Nicholas R.} and Peng, {Michelle Y.} and Merbs, {Shannath L.} and Grant, {Michael P.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.",

year = "2017",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "196--201",

journal = "Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery",

issn = "0740-9303",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants

AU - Mahoney, Nicholas R.

AU - Peng, Michelle Y.

AU - Merbs, Shannath L.

AU - Grant, Michael P.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the usage of preoperative digital anatomic implant evaluation in internal orbital fractures. Methods: An IRB-approved review of cases of orbital fracture repair was conducted and cases where digital implant modeling was performed were selected for comprehensive review. The surgical time of these cases was also compared with surgeon and implant matched controls. Results: A total of 25 patients and 26 orbits underwent preoperative virtual fitting and were reviewed. There were no complications or revision surgeries needed. Postoperative assessment demonstrated accuracy to the preoperative target with an average maximum deviation of 1.9 mm. Conclusions: Preoperative digital fracture assessment, implant manufacturer and size selection, and virtual cutting guide creation provides additional tools for orbital surgeons to achieve anatomic restoration without significant differences in operating time.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the usage of preoperative digital anatomic implant evaluation in internal orbital fractures. Methods: An IRB-approved review of cases of orbital fracture repair was conducted and cases where digital implant modeling was performed were selected for comprehensive review. The surgical time of these cases was also compared with surgeon and implant matched controls. Results: A total of 25 patients and 26 orbits underwent preoperative virtual fitting and were reviewed. There were no complications or revision surgeries needed. Postoperative assessment demonstrated accuracy to the preoperative target with an average maximum deviation of 1.9 mm. Conclusions: Preoperative digital fracture assessment, implant manufacturer and size selection, and virtual cutting guide creation provides additional tools for orbital surgeons to achieve anatomic restoration without significant differences in operating time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965014100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965014100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700

DO - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000700

M3 - Article

C2 - 27144440

AN - SCOPUS:84965014100

SN - 0740-9303

VL - 33

SP - 196

EP - 201

JO - Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery

JF - Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery

IS - 3

ER -

Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this