Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank

John Lohmeier, Jason Christy, Eric Chiang, Kali Barnes, Stephanie Cai, Conan Chen, Anshul Subramanya, Akash Chaurasia, Allison Rosen, Parth Vora, Nicholas J. Durr, Robert Allen, Allen Eghrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preloaded, trifolded grafts in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty require transfer of the trifolding process from the corneal transplant surgeon to the eye bank technician. We sought to assess whether trifolding may be safely conducted by an eye bank technician with cell loss comparable to standard peeling and lifting.

METHODS: A total of 10 grafts were stained, peeled, and transferred directly onto a bed of Calcein-AM and Amvisc Plus by an eye bank technician. Five grafts were removed and stained as a scroll, and 5 grafts were trifolded with the endothelium in before transfer. Photographs were acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope, and image segmentation was performed. A t test was conducted to compare differences in endothelial cell loss across groups.

RESULTS: Mean cell loss in the scroll group was 18.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.2%-21.9%] compared with 7.6% of the trifolded group (95% CI: 1.7%-13.5%). A 2-tailed t test indicated decreased cell loss in the trifolded group (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite additional manipulation of the graft, trifolding of Descemet membrane and endothelium may be performed by an eye bank technician without significantly increased cell loss relative to graft preparation as a scroll.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1474-1477
Number of pages4
JournalCornea
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Eye Banks
Descemet Membrane
Corneal Transplantation
Transplants
Endothelium
Confidence Intervals
Hyaluronic Acid
Endothelial Cells
Fluorescence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank. / Lohmeier, John; Christy, Jason; Chiang, Eric; Barnes, Kali; Cai, Stephanie; Chen, Conan; Subramanya, Anshul; Chaurasia, Akash; Rosen, Allison; Vora, Parth; Durr, Nicholas J.; Allen, Robert; Eghrari, Allen.

In: Cornea, Vol. 37, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 1474-1477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lohmeier, J, Christy, J, Chiang, E, Barnes, K, Cai, S, Chen, C, Subramanya, A, Chaurasia, A, Rosen, A, Vora, P, Durr, NJ, Allen, R & Eghrari, A 2018, 'Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank', Cornea, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1474-1477. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711
Lohmeier J, Christy J, Chiang E, Barnes K, Cai S, Chen C et al. Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank. Cornea. 2018 Nov 1;37(11):1474-1477. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711
Lohmeier, John ; Christy, Jason ; Chiang, Eric ; Barnes, Kali ; Cai, Stephanie ; Chen, Conan ; Subramanya, Anshul ; Chaurasia, Akash ; Rosen, Allison ; Vora, Parth ; Durr, Nicholas J. ; Allen, Robert ; Eghrari, Allen. / Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank. In: Cornea. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 11. pp. 1474-1477.
@article{08f0d0eaf7974cbba00d91986bd60af3,
title = "Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Preloaded, trifolded grafts in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty require transfer of the trifolding process from the corneal transplant surgeon to the eye bank technician. We sought to assess whether trifolding may be safely conducted by an eye bank technician with cell loss comparable to standard peeling and lifting.METHODS: A total of 10 grafts were stained, peeled, and transferred directly onto a bed of Calcein-AM and Amvisc Plus by an eye bank technician. Five grafts were removed and stained as a scroll, and 5 grafts were trifolded with the endothelium in before transfer. Photographs were acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope, and image segmentation was performed. A t test was conducted to compare differences in endothelial cell loss across groups.RESULTS: Mean cell loss in the scroll group was 18.5{\%} [95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 15.2{\%}-21.9{\%}] compared with 7.6{\%} of the trifolded group (95{\%} CI: 1.7{\%}-13.5{\%}). A 2-tailed t test indicated decreased cell loss in the trifolded group (P = 0.013).CONCLUSIONS: Despite additional manipulation of the graft, trifolding of Descemet membrane and endothelium may be performed by an eye bank technician without significantly increased cell loss relative to graft preparation as a scroll.",
author = "John Lohmeier and Jason Christy and Eric Chiang and Kali Barnes and Stephanie Cai and Conan Chen and Anshul Subramanya and Akash Chaurasia and Allison Rosen and Parth Vora and Durr, {Nicholas J.} and Robert Allen and Allen Eghrari",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1474--1477",
journal = "Cornea",
issn = "0277-3740",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank

AU - Lohmeier, John

AU - Christy, Jason

AU - Chiang, Eric

AU - Barnes, Kali

AU - Cai, Stephanie

AU - Chen, Conan

AU - Subramanya, Anshul

AU - Chaurasia, Akash

AU - Rosen, Allison

AU - Vora, Parth

AU - Durr, Nicholas J.

AU - Allen, Robert

AU - Eghrari, Allen

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Preloaded, trifolded grafts in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty require transfer of the trifolding process from the corneal transplant surgeon to the eye bank technician. We sought to assess whether trifolding may be safely conducted by an eye bank technician with cell loss comparable to standard peeling and lifting.METHODS: A total of 10 grafts were stained, peeled, and transferred directly onto a bed of Calcein-AM and Amvisc Plus by an eye bank technician. Five grafts were removed and stained as a scroll, and 5 grafts were trifolded with the endothelium in before transfer. Photographs were acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope, and image segmentation was performed. A t test was conducted to compare differences in endothelial cell loss across groups.RESULTS: Mean cell loss in the scroll group was 18.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.2%-21.9%] compared with 7.6% of the trifolded group (95% CI: 1.7%-13.5%). A 2-tailed t test indicated decreased cell loss in the trifolded group (P = 0.013).CONCLUSIONS: Despite additional manipulation of the graft, trifolding of Descemet membrane and endothelium may be performed by an eye bank technician without significantly increased cell loss relative to graft preparation as a scroll.

AB - PURPOSE: Preloaded, trifolded grafts in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty require transfer of the trifolding process from the corneal transplant surgeon to the eye bank technician. We sought to assess whether trifolding may be safely conducted by an eye bank technician with cell loss comparable to standard peeling and lifting.METHODS: A total of 10 grafts were stained, peeled, and transferred directly onto a bed of Calcein-AM and Amvisc Plus by an eye bank technician. Five grafts were removed and stained as a scroll, and 5 grafts were trifolded with the endothelium in before transfer. Photographs were acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope, and image segmentation was performed. A t test was conducted to compare differences in endothelial cell loss across groups.RESULTS: Mean cell loss in the scroll group was 18.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.2%-21.9%] compared with 7.6% of the trifolded group (95% CI: 1.7%-13.5%). A 2-tailed t test indicated decreased cell loss in the trifolded group (P = 0.013).CONCLUSIONS: Despite additional manipulation of the graft, trifolding of Descemet membrane and endothelium may be performed by an eye bank technician without significantly increased cell loss relative to graft preparation as a scroll.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054442175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054442175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711

DO - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711

M3 - Article

C2 - 30095494

AN - SCOPUS:85054442175

VL - 37

SP - 1474

EP - 1477

JO - Cornea

JF - Cornea

SN - 0277-3740

IS - 11

ER -