Verifying nomenclature of DNA variants in submitted manuscripts: Guidance for journals

Jan Higgins, Raymond Dalgleish, Johan T. den Dunnen, Greg Barsh, Peter J. Freeman, David N. Cooper, Sara Cullinan, Kay E. Davies, Huw Dorkins, Li Gong, Issei Imoto, Teri E. Klein, Bruce Korf, Adya Misra, Mark H. Paalman, Sarah Ratzel, Juergen K.V. Reichardt, Heidi L. Rehm, Katsushi Tokunaga, Karen E. WeckGarry R. Cutting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Documenting variation in our genomes is important for research and clinical care. Accuracy in the description of DNA variants is therefore essential. To address this issue, the Human Variome Project convened a committee to evaluate the feasibility of requiring authors to verify that all variants submitted for publication complied with a widely accepted standard for description. After a pilot study of two journals, the committee agreed that requiring authors to verify that variants complied with Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature is a reasonable step toward standardizing the worldwide inventory of human variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-7
Number of pages5
JournalHuman mutation
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • ClinVar
  • DNA variants
  • Human Genome Variation Society
  • Leiden Open Variation Database

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Verifying nomenclature of DNA variants in submitted manuscripts: Guidance for journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this