Ventricular-arterial interaction: Cardiac effects of mean versus pulsatile arterial load

David A Kass, L. E. Ford, E. Yellin, N. Westerhof, G. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The influence of the two principal components of vascular loading, mean resistance and pulsatile load, on the contractile and energetic performance of the left ventricle are discussed. The data suggest that while large changes in mean resistance leading to varying ejection fraction can influence both cardiac systolic mechanics and energetic efficiency, substantial changes in pulsatile loading do not. They provide an explanation for why pulsatile loading does not necessarily result in a coronary supply/demand imbalance. By not significantly altering chamber systolic performance of elastance (i.e. stiffness), the pulsatile load results in parallel increases in coronary systolic pressure and flow, allowing adequate perfusion despite the reduced mean diastolic perfusion pressure. Future studies are required to better determine how cardiac disease alters the interplay between vascular load and cardiac performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-312
Number of pages12
JournalAdvances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Volume346
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Perfusion
Blood Pressure
Mechanics
Heart Ventricles
Heart Diseases
Loads (forces)
Stiffness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Ventricular-arterial interaction : Cardiac effects of mean versus pulsatile arterial load. / Kass, David A; Ford, L. E.; Yellin, E.; Westerhof, N.; Mitchell, G.

In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 346, 1993, p. 301-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kass, David A ; Ford, L. E. ; Yellin, E. ; Westerhof, N. ; Mitchell, G. / Ventricular-arterial interaction : Cardiac effects of mean versus pulsatile arterial load. In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 1993 ; Vol. 346. pp. 301-312.
@article{a761a599bcd14895bcaa8d7ae33ab9fe,
title = "Ventricular-arterial interaction: Cardiac effects of mean versus pulsatile arterial load",
abstract = "The influence of the two principal components of vascular loading, mean resistance and pulsatile load, on the contractile and energetic performance of the left ventricle are discussed. The data suggest that while large changes in mean resistance leading to varying ejection fraction can influence both cardiac systolic mechanics and energetic efficiency, substantial changes in pulsatile loading do not. They provide an explanation for why pulsatile loading does not necessarily result in a coronary supply/demand imbalance. By not significantly altering chamber systolic performance of elastance (i.e. stiffness), the pulsatile load results in parallel increases in coronary systolic pressure and flow, allowing adequate perfusion despite the reduced mean diastolic perfusion pressure. Future studies are required to better determine how cardiac disease alters the interplay between vascular load and cardiac performance.",
author = "Kass, {David A} and Ford, {L. E.} and E. Yellin and N. Westerhof and G. Mitchell",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "346",
pages = "301--312",
journal = "Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0065-2598",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ventricular-arterial interaction

T2 - Cardiac effects of mean versus pulsatile arterial load

AU - Kass, David A

AU - Ford, L. E.

AU - Yellin, E.

AU - Westerhof, N.

AU - Mitchell, G.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The influence of the two principal components of vascular loading, mean resistance and pulsatile load, on the contractile and energetic performance of the left ventricle are discussed. The data suggest that while large changes in mean resistance leading to varying ejection fraction can influence both cardiac systolic mechanics and energetic efficiency, substantial changes in pulsatile loading do not. They provide an explanation for why pulsatile loading does not necessarily result in a coronary supply/demand imbalance. By not significantly altering chamber systolic performance of elastance (i.e. stiffness), the pulsatile load results in parallel increases in coronary systolic pressure and flow, allowing adequate perfusion despite the reduced mean diastolic perfusion pressure. Future studies are required to better determine how cardiac disease alters the interplay between vascular load and cardiac performance.

AB - The influence of the two principal components of vascular loading, mean resistance and pulsatile load, on the contractile and energetic performance of the left ventricle are discussed. The data suggest that while large changes in mean resistance leading to varying ejection fraction can influence both cardiac systolic mechanics and energetic efficiency, substantial changes in pulsatile loading do not. They provide an explanation for why pulsatile loading does not necessarily result in a coronary supply/demand imbalance. By not significantly altering chamber systolic performance of elastance (i.e. stiffness), the pulsatile load results in parallel increases in coronary systolic pressure and flow, allowing adequate perfusion despite the reduced mean diastolic perfusion pressure. Future studies are required to better determine how cardiac disease alters the interplay between vascular load and cardiac performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027718227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027718227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8184769

AN - SCOPUS:0027718227

VL - 346

SP - 301

EP - 312

JO - Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

JF - Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

SN - 0065-2598

ER -