Variation in surgical site infection monitoring and reporting by state.

Martin A Makary, Monica S. Aswani, Andrew M. Ibrahim, Julie Reagan, Elizabeth C. Wick, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common, costly, and often preventable. There are no national requirements for measuring or reporting hospital SSI rates and state-level monitoring occurs with little coordination between states. We designed a study to describe the current status of SSI reporting in the United States. We reviewed SSI monitoring and reporting legislation in all 50 states in September 2010. Data collected included whether SSI monitoring and reporting legislation exists, if public reporting is required, how the data are accessible, and for which procedures SSI data are reported. Twenty-one (42%) states have legislation for SSI monitoring and reporting. All 21 of these states require public release of findings. Of the states with legislation, eight (38%) currently have SSI data available publicly. A range of two to seven procedures were reported for SSI measurement by individual states. Eighteen (86%) states use state agency websites to make their data publicly available. There is wide variation in state monitoring and reporting of SSI rates. Standardized reporting may be needed so that consumers can make informed health choices based on quality metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalJournal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Legislation
Cross Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Variation in surgical site infection monitoring and reporting by state. / Makary, Martin A; Aswani, Monica S.; Ibrahim, Andrew M.; Reagan, Julie; Wick, Elizabeth C.; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 35, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 41-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makary, Martin A ; Aswani, Monica S. ; Ibrahim, Andrew M. ; Reagan, Julie ; Wick, Elizabeth C. ; Pronovost, Peter J. / Variation in surgical site infection monitoring and reporting by state. In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 41-46.
@article{488674b47b634105afa1a3edeb42ffea,
title = "Variation in surgical site infection monitoring and reporting by state.",
abstract = "Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common, costly, and often preventable. There are no national requirements for measuring or reporting hospital SSI rates and state-level monitoring occurs with little coordination between states. We designed a study to describe the current status of SSI reporting in the United States. We reviewed SSI monitoring and reporting legislation in all 50 states in September 2010. Data collected included whether SSI monitoring and reporting legislation exists, if public reporting is required, how the data are accessible, and for which procedures SSI data are reported. Twenty-one (42{\%}) states have legislation for SSI monitoring and reporting. All 21 of these states require public release of findings. Of the states with legislation, eight (38{\%}) currently have SSI data available publicly. A range of two to seven procedures were reported for SSI measurement by individual states. Eighteen (86{\%}) states use state agency websites to make their data publicly available. There is wide variation in state monitoring and reporting of SSI rates. Standardized reporting may be needed so that consumers can make informed health choices based on quality metrics.",
author = "Makary, {Martin A} and Aswani, {Monica S.} and Ibrahim, {Andrew M.} and Julie Reagan and Wick, {Elizabeth C.} and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "41--46",
journal = "Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality",
issn = "1062-2551",
publisher = "National Association for Healthcare Quality",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in surgical site infection monitoring and reporting by state.

AU - Makary, Martin A

AU - Aswani, Monica S.

AU - Ibrahim, Andrew M.

AU - Reagan, Julie

AU - Wick, Elizabeth C.

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common, costly, and often preventable. There are no national requirements for measuring or reporting hospital SSI rates and state-level monitoring occurs with little coordination between states. We designed a study to describe the current status of SSI reporting in the United States. We reviewed SSI monitoring and reporting legislation in all 50 states in September 2010. Data collected included whether SSI monitoring and reporting legislation exists, if public reporting is required, how the data are accessible, and for which procedures SSI data are reported. Twenty-one (42%) states have legislation for SSI monitoring and reporting. All 21 of these states require public release of findings. Of the states with legislation, eight (38%) currently have SSI data available publicly. A range of two to seven procedures were reported for SSI measurement by individual states. Eighteen (86%) states use state agency websites to make their data publicly available. There is wide variation in state monitoring and reporting of SSI rates. Standardized reporting may be needed so that consumers can make informed health choices based on quality metrics.

AB - Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common, costly, and often preventable. There are no national requirements for measuring or reporting hospital SSI rates and state-level monitoring occurs with little coordination between states. We designed a study to describe the current status of SSI reporting in the United States. We reviewed SSI monitoring and reporting legislation in all 50 states in September 2010. Data collected included whether SSI monitoring and reporting legislation exists, if public reporting is required, how the data are accessible, and for which procedures SSI data are reported. Twenty-one (42%) states have legislation for SSI monitoring and reporting. All 21 of these states require public release of findings. Of the states with legislation, eight (38%) currently have SSI data available publicly. A range of two to seven procedures were reported for SSI measurement by individual states. Eighteen (86%) states use state agency websites to make their data publicly available. There is wide variation in state monitoring and reporting of SSI rates. Standardized reporting may be needed so that consumers can make informed health choices based on quality metrics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888328492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888328492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22385154

AN - SCOPUS:84888328492

VL - 35

SP - 41

EP - 46

JO - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

JF - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

SN - 1062-2551

IS - 2

ER -