TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation in Ophthalmic Testing Before Cataract Surgery
T2 - Results of a National Survey of Ophthalmologists
AU - Steinberg, Earl P.
AU - Bass, Eric B.
AU - Luthra, Rajiv
AU - Schein, Oliver D.
AU - Sharkey, Phoebe
AU - Javitt, Jonathan
AU - Tielsch, James
AU - Kolb, Margaret
AU - Steinwachs, Donald
N1 - Funding Information:
AcceptedforpublicationDecember15, 1993. Thisworkwas supported by grant HS-06280from the AgencyforHealth Care Policy andResearch, Rockville, Md. WethankSandiEzrine,MS,andhercolleaguesat SurveyResearchAssociates Ine(Baltimore,Md)fortheir workinadministeringthesurveyandLeeBrucheyforher assistanceinpreparingthemanuscript. Reprint requests to TheJohns Hopkins University, 1830 EMonumentSt,Room8068, Baltimore,MD21205(Dr Steinberg).
PY - 1994/7
Y1 - 1994/7
N2 - Little information is available either for the clinical value of many ophthalmic tests performed preoperatively in the evaluation of patients for cataract surgery or for variation in ophthalmologists' use of such tests. To assess variation in ophthalmologists' use of ophthalmic tests, we conducted a national survey of American Academy of Ophthalmology members. Thirty-three percent, 17%, 37%, and 19% of the respondents reported that they "frequently" or "always" perform glare testing, contrast sensitivity testing, potential acuity measurement, and specular microscopy, respectively, in patients being considered for cataract surgery who have no history of eye disease other than cataract. In contrast, 27%, 54%, 24%, and 48% of respondents reported that they never perform each of these four tests in such patients. Two ophthalmologist characteristics—a surgical volume of greater than 200 cataract extractions per year and performance of surgery in an ambulatory surgical center or private office (as opposed to a hospital)-were independently associated with an increased probability of performing each of these four tests frequently or always. Ten percent or less of the respondents reported that they frequently or always perform electroretinography, visual evoked response testing, photography of fundus or anterior segment, B-scan ultrasonography, formal color vision testing, and formal visual field testing in such patients. Thus, there is considerable variation in ophthalmologists' use of glare testing, contrast sensitivity testing, potential acuity measurement, and specular microscopy. A small percentage of ophthalmologists may be overusing several other tests in the evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery.
AB - Little information is available either for the clinical value of many ophthalmic tests performed preoperatively in the evaluation of patients for cataract surgery or for variation in ophthalmologists' use of such tests. To assess variation in ophthalmologists' use of ophthalmic tests, we conducted a national survey of American Academy of Ophthalmology members. Thirty-three percent, 17%, 37%, and 19% of the respondents reported that they "frequently" or "always" perform glare testing, contrast sensitivity testing, potential acuity measurement, and specular microscopy, respectively, in patients being considered for cataract surgery who have no history of eye disease other than cataract. In contrast, 27%, 54%, 24%, and 48% of respondents reported that they never perform each of these four tests in such patients. Two ophthalmologist characteristics—a surgical volume of greater than 200 cataract extractions per year and performance of surgery in an ambulatory surgical center or private office (as opposed to a hospital)-were independently associated with an increased probability of performing each of these four tests frequently or always. Ten percent or less of the respondents reported that they frequently or always perform electroretinography, visual evoked response testing, photography of fundus or anterior segment, B-scan ultrasonography, formal color vision testing, and formal visual field testing in such patients. Thus, there is considerable variation in ophthalmologists' use of glare testing, contrast sensitivity testing, potential acuity measurement, and specular microscopy. A small percentage of ophthalmologists may be overusing several other tests in the evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028290798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028290798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090190044020
DO - 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090190044020
M3 - Article
C2 - 8031268
AN - SCOPUS:0028290798
SN - 0003-9950
VL - 112
SP - 896
EP - 902
JO - Archives of ophthalmology
JF - Archives of ophthalmology
IS - 7
ER -