Variation in human body size and shape

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evolutionary trends in human body form provide important context for interpreting variation among modern populations. Average body mass in living humans is smaller than it was during most of the Pleistocene, possibly owing to technological improvements during the past 50,000 years that no longer favored large body size. Sexual dimorphism in body size reached modern levels at least 150,000 years ago and probably earlier. Geographic variation in both body size and shape in earlier humans paralleled latitudinal clines observed today. Climatic adaptation is the most likely primary cause for these gradients, overlain in more recent populations by nutritional effects on growth. Thus, to distinguish growth disturbances, it is necessary to partition out the (presumably genetic) long-term differences in body form between populations that have resulted from climatic selection. An example is given from a study of Inupiat children, using a new index of body shape to assess relative body mass.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-232
Number of pages22
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Body Size
Human Body
cause
trend
Pleistocene
Sexual Dimorphism
Evolutionary
Causes

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Climate
  • Growth
  • Hominin
  • Nutrition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Variation in human body size and shape. / Ruff, Christopher B.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 31, 2002, p. 211-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{383c1fa241e3427492c15545301ea299,
title = "Variation in human body size and shape",
abstract = "Evolutionary trends in human body form provide important context for interpreting variation among modern populations. Average body mass in living humans is smaller than it was during most of the Pleistocene, possibly owing to technological improvements during the past 50,000 years that no longer favored large body size. Sexual dimorphism in body size reached modern levels at least 150,000 years ago and probably earlier. Geographic variation in both body size and shape in earlier humans paralleled latitudinal clines observed today. Climatic adaptation is the most likely primary cause for these gradients, overlain in more recent populations by nutritional effects on growth. Thus, to distinguish growth disturbances, it is necessary to partition out the (presumably genetic) long-term differences in body form between populations that have resulted from climatic selection. An example is given from a study of Inupiat children, using a new index of body shape to assess relative body mass.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Climate, Growth, Hominin, Nutrition",
author = "Ruff, {Christopher B}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085407",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "211--232",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in human body size and shape

AU - Ruff, Christopher B

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Evolutionary trends in human body form provide important context for interpreting variation among modern populations. Average body mass in living humans is smaller than it was during most of the Pleistocene, possibly owing to technological improvements during the past 50,000 years that no longer favored large body size. Sexual dimorphism in body size reached modern levels at least 150,000 years ago and probably earlier. Geographic variation in both body size and shape in earlier humans paralleled latitudinal clines observed today. Climatic adaptation is the most likely primary cause for these gradients, overlain in more recent populations by nutritional effects on growth. Thus, to distinguish growth disturbances, it is necessary to partition out the (presumably genetic) long-term differences in body form between populations that have resulted from climatic selection. An example is given from a study of Inupiat children, using a new index of body shape to assess relative body mass.

AB - Evolutionary trends in human body form provide important context for interpreting variation among modern populations. Average body mass in living humans is smaller than it was during most of the Pleistocene, possibly owing to technological improvements during the past 50,000 years that no longer favored large body size. Sexual dimorphism in body size reached modern levels at least 150,000 years ago and probably earlier. Geographic variation in both body size and shape in earlier humans paralleled latitudinal clines observed today. Climatic adaptation is the most likely primary cause for these gradients, overlain in more recent populations by nutritional effects on growth. Thus, to distinguish growth disturbances, it is necessary to partition out the (presumably genetic) long-term differences in body form between populations that have resulted from climatic selection. An example is given from a study of Inupiat children, using a new index of body shape to assess relative body mass.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Climate

KW - Growth

KW - Hominin

KW - Nutrition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041599858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041599858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085407

DO - 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085407

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 211

EP - 232

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

ER -