Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments

Roberts S Mayer, Ing Ho Chen, Steven A. Lavender, Jordan H. Trafimow, Gunnar B J Andersson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design. Repeated measurements were made of lumbar sagittal range of motion by 14 examiners using three different measuroment instruments. Objectives. To determine the reliability of lumber range of motion measurements among examiners, subjects, and instruments, and to datermine whether variance is duo to subject inconsistency, examiner inconsistency, differences between examiners, or differences between instruments. Summary of Background Data. Measurements of lumbar spine range of motion are widely used in research and clinical applications as well as in disability rating systems for patients with low back pain. Methods-Fourteen examiners measured the sagittal range of motion. Using three instruments, 18 healthy subjects were measured twice in a randomized sequence with blinded readings when performing full flexion, and partial flexion to a defined midpoint. None of the examiners routinely used the particular instruments in their practices. Results. The mean test-retest reliability was 4,9°. The intraexaminer reliability did not differ significantly among the examiners. Furthermore, there was no systematic difference resulting from instruments or posture condition. However, there was a statistically significant variance among examiners—i.e., a poor interexarmner reliability. Conclusion. The most likely explanation for these findings is the variability among examiners in locating bony landmarks. The results indicate that range of motion measurements must be interpreted with caution in clinical, research, and disability applications. Test administrator training may improve results, but tills could not be determined from this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1489-1493
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume20
Issue number13
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Spine
Low Back Pain
Administrative Personnel
Posture
Research
Reproducibility of Results
Reading
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Impairment
  • Low-back pain
  • Range of motion
  • Trunk motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Mayer, R. S., Chen, I. H., Lavender, S. A., Trafimow, J. H., & Andersson, G. B. J. (1995). Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. Spine, 20(13), 1489-1493.

Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. / Mayer, Roberts S; Chen, Ing Ho; Lavender, Steven A.; Trafimow, Jordan H.; Andersson, Gunnar B J.

In: Spine, Vol. 20, No. 13, 1995, p. 1489-1493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mayer, RS, Chen, IH, Lavender, SA, Trafimow, JH & Andersson, GBJ 1995, 'Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments', Spine, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1489-1493.
Mayer, Roberts S ; Chen, Ing Ho ; Lavender, Steven A. ; Trafimow, Jordan H. ; Andersson, Gunnar B J. / Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. In: Spine. 1995 ; Vol. 20, No. 13. pp. 1489-1493.
@article{a2e634ed61284a499a67c1926f222a26,
title = "Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments",
abstract = "Study Design. Repeated measurements were made of lumbar sagittal range of motion by 14 examiners using three different measuroment instruments. Objectives. To determine the reliability of lumber range of motion measurements among examiners, subjects, and instruments, and to datermine whether variance is duo to subject inconsistency, examiner inconsistency, differences between examiners, or differences between instruments. Summary of Background Data. Measurements of lumbar spine range of motion are widely used in research and clinical applications as well as in disability rating systems for patients with low back pain. Methods-Fourteen examiners measured the sagittal range of motion. Using three instruments, 18 healthy subjects were measured twice in a randomized sequence with blinded readings when performing full flexion, and partial flexion to a defined midpoint. None of the examiners routinely used the particular instruments in their practices. Results. The mean test-retest reliability was 4,9°. The intraexaminer reliability did not differ significantly among the examiners. Furthermore, there was no systematic difference resulting from instruments or posture condition. However, there was a statistically significant variance among examiners—i.e., a poor interexarmner reliability. Conclusion. The most likely explanation for these findings is the variability among examiners in locating bony landmarks. The results indicate that range of motion measurements must be interpreted with caution in clinical, research, and disability applications. Test administrator training may improve results, but tills could not be determined from this study.",
keywords = "Impairment, Low-back pain, Range of motion, Trunk motion",
author = "Mayer, {Roberts S} and Chen, {Ing Ho} and Lavender, {Steven A.} and Trafimow, {Jordan H.} and Andersson, {Gunnar B J}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1489--1493",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments

AU - Mayer, Roberts S

AU - Chen, Ing Ho

AU - Lavender, Steven A.

AU - Trafimow, Jordan H.

AU - Andersson, Gunnar B J

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Study Design. Repeated measurements were made of lumbar sagittal range of motion by 14 examiners using three different measuroment instruments. Objectives. To determine the reliability of lumber range of motion measurements among examiners, subjects, and instruments, and to datermine whether variance is duo to subject inconsistency, examiner inconsistency, differences between examiners, or differences between instruments. Summary of Background Data. Measurements of lumbar spine range of motion are widely used in research and clinical applications as well as in disability rating systems for patients with low back pain. Methods-Fourteen examiners measured the sagittal range of motion. Using three instruments, 18 healthy subjects were measured twice in a randomized sequence with blinded readings when performing full flexion, and partial flexion to a defined midpoint. None of the examiners routinely used the particular instruments in their practices. Results. The mean test-retest reliability was 4,9°. The intraexaminer reliability did not differ significantly among the examiners. Furthermore, there was no systematic difference resulting from instruments or posture condition. However, there was a statistically significant variance among examiners—i.e., a poor interexarmner reliability. Conclusion. The most likely explanation for these findings is the variability among examiners in locating bony landmarks. The results indicate that range of motion measurements must be interpreted with caution in clinical, research, and disability applications. Test administrator training may improve results, but tills could not be determined from this study.

AB - Study Design. Repeated measurements were made of lumbar sagittal range of motion by 14 examiners using three different measuroment instruments. Objectives. To determine the reliability of lumber range of motion measurements among examiners, subjects, and instruments, and to datermine whether variance is duo to subject inconsistency, examiner inconsistency, differences between examiners, or differences between instruments. Summary of Background Data. Measurements of lumbar spine range of motion are widely used in research and clinical applications as well as in disability rating systems for patients with low back pain. Methods-Fourteen examiners measured the sagittal range of motion. Using three instruments, 18 healthy subjects were measured twice in a randomized sequence with blinded readings when performing full flexion, and partial flexion to a defined midpoint. None of the examiners routinely used the particular instruments in their practices. Results. The mean test-retest reliability was 4,9°. The intraexaminer reliability did not differ significantly among the examiners. Furthermore, there was no systematic difference resulting from instruments or posture condition. However, there was a statistically significant variance among examiners—i.e., a poor interexarmner reliability. Conclusion. The most likely explanation for these findings is the variability among examiners in locating bony landmarks. The results indicate that range of motion measurements must be interpreted with caution in clinical, research, and disability applications. Test administrator training may improve results, but tills could not be determined from this study.

KW - Impairment

KW - Low-back pain

KW - Range of motion

KW - Trunk motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029062227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029062227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1489

EP - 1493

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 13

ER -