Variability in diagnostic opinion among pathologists for single small atypical foci in prostate biopsies

Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast, Andrew Evans, Gina Lockwood, Doug Tkachuk, David G. Bostwick, Jonathan I. Epstein, Peter A. Humphrey, Rodolfo Montironi, Geert J.L.H. Van Leenders, Carl Gustaf Pihl, Ingrid Neetens, Paula M. Kujala, Marita Laurila, Catharine Mazerolles, Lukas Bubendorf, Antonio Finelli, Kemp Watson, John Srigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pathologists are increasingly exposed to prostate biopsies with small atypical foci, requiring differentiation between adenocarcinoma, atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy, and a benign diagnosis. We studied the level of agreement for such atypical foci among experts in urologic pathology and all-round reference pathologists of the European Randomized Screening study of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). For this purpose, we retrieved 20 prostate biopsies with small (most <1 mm) atypical foci. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, including 10 immunostained slides were digitalized for virtual microscopy. The lesional area was not marked. Five experts and 7 ERSPC pathologists examined the cases. Multirater κ statistics was applied to determine agreement and significant differences between experts and ERSPC pathologists. The κ value of experts (0.39; confidence interval, 0.29-0.49) was significantly higher than that of ERSPC pathologists (0.21; confidence interval, 0.14-0.27). Full (100%) agreement was reached by the 5 experts for 7 of 20 biopsies. Experts and ERSPC pathologists rendered diagnoses ranging from benign to adenocarcinoma on the same biopsy in 5 and 9 biopsies, respectively. Most of these lesions comprised between 2 and 5 atypical glands. The experts diagnosed adenocarcinoma (49%) more often than the ERSPC pathologists (32%) (P<0.001). As agreement was particularly poor for foci comprising <6 glands, we would encourage pathologists to obtain intercollegial consultation of a specialized pathologist for these lesions before a carcinoma diagnosis, whereas clinicians may consider to perform staging biopsies before engaging on deferred or definite therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-177
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Keywords

  • Diagnostics
  • Interobserver variation
  • Pathology
  • Prostate biopsy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Virtual microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Surgery
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Variability in diagnostic opinion among pathologists for single small atypical foci in prostate biopsies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Van Der Kwast, T. H., Evans, A., Lockwood, G., Tkachuk, D., Bostwick, D. G., Epstein, J. I., Humphrey, P. A., Montironi, R., Van Leenders, G. J. L. H., Pihl, C. G., Neetens, I., Kujala, P. M., Laurila, M., Mazerolles, C., Bubendorf, L., Finelli, A., Watson, K., & Srigley, J. (2010). Variability in diagnostic opinion among pathologists for single small atypical foci in prostate biopsies. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 34(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c7997b