Validity of criteria used to evaluate fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio

Kenneth M Shermock, Jason T. Connor, Nicole T. Smith, Jodie M. Fink, Lee Bragg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Investigators commonly rely on unvalidated, mainly arithmetic criteria to predict if point-of-care fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio (INR) lead to the same warfarin dosing decisions as a standard measure. Methods. Criteria that predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements were evaluated using clinicians' actual dosing decisions as the standard. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was used to rank the criteria by the proportion of correct dosing predictions and the magnitude of difference between actual and predicted dosing agreement. Results. The prediction criteria misclassified dosing agreement for between 19% and 38% of paired INR values (x̄: 27%). The magnitude of misclassification varied inconsistently throughout the INR scale. Conclusion. The unvalidated criteria used to predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements are associated with large error. Warfarin dosing decisions should be measured directly in such assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-246
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

International Normalized Ratio
Warfarin
Equipment and Supplies
Point-of-Care Systems
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Bias
  • International Normalized Ratio
  • Outcome assessment
  • Point of care systems
  • Validity
  • Warfarin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Validity of criteria used to evaluate fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio. / Shermock, Kenneth M; Connor, Jason T.; Smith, Nicole T.; Fink, Jodie M.; Bragg, Lee.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 26, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 239-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shermock, Kenneth M ; Connor, Jason T. ; Smith, Nicole T. ; Fink, Jodie M. ; Bragg, Lee. / Validity of criteria used to evaluate fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio. In: Medical Decision Making. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 239-246.
@article{530f4846c4c742d09b1fa89c6eb6727b,
title = "Validity of criteria used to evaluate fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio",
abstract = "Background. Investigators commonly rely on unvalidated, mainly arithmetic criteria to predict if point-of-care fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio (INR) lead to the same warfarin dosing decisions as a standard measure. Methods. Criteria that predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements were evaluated using clinicians' actual dosing decisions as the standard. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was used to rank the criteria by the proportion of correct dosing predictions and the magnitude of difference between actual and predicted dosing agreement. Results. The prediction criteria misclassified dosing agreement for between 19{\%} and 38{\%} of paired INR values (x̄: 27{\%}). The magnitude of misclassification varied inconsistently throughout the INR scale. Conclusion. The unvalidated criteria used to predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements are associated with large error. Warfarin dosing decisions should be measured directly in such assessments.",
keywords = "Bias, International Normalized Ratio, Outcome assessment, Point of care systems, Validity, Warfarin",
author = "Shermock, {Kenneth M} and Connor, {Jason T.} and Smith, {Nicole T.} and Fink, {Jodie M.} and Lee Bragg",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X06288681",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "239--246",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of criteria used to evaluate fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio

AU - Shermock, Kenneth M

AU - Connor, Jason T.

AU - Smith, Nicole T.

AU - Fink, Jodie M.

AU - Bragg, Lee

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Background. Investigators commonly rely on unvalidated, mainly arithmetic criteria to predict if point-of-care fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio (INR) lead to the same warfarin dosing decisions as a standard measure. Methods. Criteria that predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements were evaluated using clinicians' actual dosing decisions as the standard. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was used to rank the criteria by the proportion of correct dosing predictions and the magnitude of difference between actual and predicted dosing agreement. Results. The prediction criteria misclassified dosing agreement for between 19% and 38% of paired INR values (x̄: 27%). The magnitude of misclassification varied inconsistently throughout the INR scale. Conclusion. The unvalidated criteria used to predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements are associated with large error. Warfarin dosing decisions should be measured directly in such assessments.

AB - Background. Investigators commonly rely on unvalidated, mainly arithmetic criteria to predict if point-of-care fingerstick devices that assess International Normalized Ratio (INR) lead to the same warfarin dosing decisions as a standard measure. Methods. Criteria that predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements were evaluated using clinicians' actual dosing decisions as the standard. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was used to rank the criteria by the proportion of correct dosing predictions and the magnitude of difference between actual and predicted dosing agreement. Results. The prediction criteria misclassified dosing agreement for between 19% and 38% of paired INR values (x̄: 27%). The magnitude of misclassification varied inconsistently throughout the INR scale. Conclusion. The unvalidated criteria used to predict warfarin dosing agreement between 2 INR measurements are associated with large error. Warfarin dosing decisions should be measured directly in such assessments.

KW - Bias

KW - International Normalized Ratio

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Point of care systems

KW - Validity

KW - Warfarin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646539472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646539472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X06288681

DO - 10.1177/0272989X06288681

M3 - Article

C2 - 16751322

AN - SCOPUS:33646539472

VL - 26

SP - 239

EP - 246

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -