Abstract
Background: Team-based interventions are effective for improving safety and quality of healthcare. However, contextual factors, such as team functioning, leadership, and organizational support, can vary significantly across teams and affect the level of implementation success. Yet, the science for measuring context is immature. The goal of this study is to validate measures from a short instrument tailored to track dynamic context and progress for a team-based quality improvement (QI) intervention.Methods: Design: Secondary cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of data from a clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a team-based quality improvement intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICUs).Setting: Forty-six ICUs located within 35 faith-based, not-for-profit community hospitals across 12 states in the U.S.Population: Team members participating in an ICU-based QI intervention.Measures: The primary measure is the Team Check-up Tool (TCT), an original instrument that assesses context and progress of a team-based QI intervention. The TCT is administered monthly. Validation measures include CLABSI rate, Team Functioning Survey (TFS) and Practice Environment Scale (PES) from the Nursing Work Index.Analysis: Temporal stability, responsiveness and validity of the TCT.Results: We found evidence supporting the temporal stability, construct validity, and responsiveness of TCT measures of intervention activities, perceived group-level behaviors, and barriers to team progress.Conclusions: The TCT demonstrates good measurement reliability, validity, and responsiveness. By having more validated measures on implementation context, researchers can more readily conduct rigorous studies to identify contextual variables linked to key intervention and patient outcomes and strengthen the evidence base on successful spread of efficacious team-based interventions. QI teams participating in an intervention should also find data from a validated tool useful for identifying opportunities to improve their own implementation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 115 |
| Journal | Implementation Science |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 3 2011 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
- Medicine(all)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health Informatics
Cite this
Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative : Findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT). / Chan, Kitty S.; Hsu, Yea-Jen; Lubomski, Lisa; Marsteller, Jill A.
In: Implementation Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 115, 03.10.2011.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative
T2 - Findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)
AU - Chan, Kitty S.
AU - Hsu, Yea-Jen
AU - Lubomski, Lisa
AU - Marsteller, Jill A
PY - 2011/10/3
Y1 - 2011/10/3
N2 - Background: Team-based interventions are effective for improving safety and quality of healthcare. However, contextual factors, such as team functioning, leadership, and organizational support, can vary significantly across teams and affect the level of implementation success. Yet, the science for measuring context is immature. The goal of this study is to validate measures from a short instrument tailored to track dynamic context and progress for a team-based quality improvement (QI) intervention.Methods: Design: Secondary cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of data from a clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a team-based quality improvement intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICUs).Setting: Forty-six ICUs located within 35 faith-based, not-for-profit community hospitals across 12 states in the U.S.Population: Team members participating in an ICU-based QI intervention.Measures: The primary measure is the Team Check-up Tool (TCT), an original instrument that assesses context and progress of a team-based QI intervention. The TCT is administered monthly. Validation measures include CLABSI rate, Team Functioning Survey (TFS) and Practice Environment Scale (PES) from the Nursing Work Index.Analysis: Temporal stability, responsiveness and validity of the TCT.Results: We found evidence supporting the temporal stability, construct validity, and responsiveness of TCT measures of intervention activities, perceived group-level behaviors, and barriers to team progress.Conclusions: The TCT demonstrates good measurement reliability, validity, and responsiveness. By having more validated measures on implementation context, researchers can more readily conduct rigorous studies to identify contextual variables linked to key intervention and patient outcomes and strengthen the evidence base on successful spread of efficacious team-based interventions. QI teams participating in an intervention should also find data from a validated tool useful for identifying opportunities to improve their own implementation.
AB - Background: Team-based interventions are effective for improving safety and quality of healthcare. However, contextual factors, such as team functioning, leadership, and organizational support, can vary significantly across teams and affect the level of implementation success. Yet, the science for measuring context is immature. The goal of this study is to validate measures from a short instrument tailored to track dynamic context and progress for a team-based quality improvement (QI) intervention.Methods: Design: Secondary cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of data from a clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a team-based quality improvement intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICUs).Setting: Forty-six ICUs located within 35 faith-based, not-for-profit community hospitals across 12 states in the U.S.Population: Team members participating in an ICU-based QI intervention.Measures: The primary measure is the Team Check-up Tool (TCT), an original instrument that assesses context and progress of a team-based QI intervention. The TCT is administered monthly. Validation measures include CLABSI rate, Team Functioning Survey (TFS) and Practice Environment Scale (PES) from the Nursing Work Index.Analysis: Temporal stability, responsiveness and validity of the TCT.Results: We found evidence supporting the temporal stability, construct validity, and responsiveness of TCT measures of intervention activities, perceived group-level behaviors, and barriers to team progress.Conclusions: The TCT demonstrates good measurement reliability, validity, and responsiveness. By having more validated measures on implementation context, researchers can more readily conduct rigorous studies to identify contextual variables linked to key intervention and patient outcomes and strengthen the evidence base on successful spread of efficacious team-based interventions. QI teams participating in an intervention should also find data from a validated tool useful for identifying opportunities to improve their own implementation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053458523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053458523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-115
DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-115
M3 - Article
C2 - 21967862
AN - SCOPUS:80053458523
VL - 6
JO - Implementation Science
JF - Implementation Science
SN - 1748-5908
IS - 1
M1 - 115
ER -