TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the proposed World Health Organization staging system for HIV disease and infection in a cohort of intravenous drug users
AU - Aylward, R. Bruce
AU - Vlahov, David
AU - Muñoz, Alvaro
AU - Rapiti, Elisabetta
PY - 1994/8
Y1 - 1994/8
N2 - Objective: To assess the prognostic utility of the clinical criteria of the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed staging system for HIV disease and infection in a cohort of intravenous drug users (IVDU) from the ALIVE study. Methods: All study subjects known to be HIV-seropositive were included in this analysis. Subjects were classified as WHO clinical stage 1, 2, or 3 at their initial seropositive evaluation. Product-limit estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare time of progression to AIDS (stage 4) for the first three clinical stages. Results: Of the original cohort of 2921 IVDU in the ALIVE study, 694 were known to be HIV-positive by January 1992. At the time of their index visit, 49% of the cohort were WHO clinical stage 1, 10% stage 2 and 41% were stage 3. Demographic characteristics of the three groups were similar. Product-limit estimates for progression to AIDS over a 3-year period were 6.5% (SE, 1.5%), 10.4% (SE, 4.1%) and 17.1% (SE, 2.5%) for clinical stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively (log-rank P=0.003). In a proportional hazards model adjusting for race, age, sex and injection status within 6 months prior to enrollment, the hazard for progression to AIDS was 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-3.77] and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.40-4.08) for stages 2 and 3, respectively, relative to stage 1. Conclusion: This study, in a population of IVDU, supports the utility of the WHO staging system in predicting progression from HIV seropositivity to AIDS on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms.
AB - Objective: To assess the prognostic utility of the clinical criteria of the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed staging system for HIV disease and infection in a cohort of intravenous drug users (IVDU) from the ALIVE study. Methods: All study subjects known to be HIV-seropositive were included in this analysis. Subjects were classified as WHO clinical stage 1, 2, or 3 at their initial seropositive evaluation. Product-limit estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare time of progression to AIDS (stage 4) for the first three clinical stages. Results: Of the original cohort of 2921 IVDU in the ALIVE study, 694 were known to be HIV-positive by January 1992. At the time of their index visit, 49% of the cohort were WHO clinical stage 1, 10% stage 2 and 41% were stage 3. Demographic characteristics of the three groups were similar. Product-limit estimates for progression to AIDS over a 3-year period were 6.5% (SE, 1.5%), 10.4% (SE, 4.1%) and 17.1% (SE, 2.5%) for clinical stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively (log-rank P=0.003). In a proportional hazards model adjusting for race, age, sex and injection status within 6 months prior to enrollment, the hazard for progression to AIDS was 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-3.77] and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.40-4.08) for stages 2 and 3, respectively, relative to stage 1. Conclusion: This study, in a population of IVDU, supports the utility of the WHO staging system in predicting progression from HIV seropositivity to AIDS on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms.
KW - AIDS
KW - HIV
KW - Prognosis
KW - Staging system
KW - Substance use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028237514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028237514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00002030-199408000-00015
DO - 10.1097/00002030-199408000-00015
M3 - Article
C2 - 7986411
AN - SCOPUS:0028237514
SN - 0269-9370
VL - 8
SP - 1129
EP - 1133
JO - AIDS
JF - AIDS
IS - 8
ER -