Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes

Elaine Wittenberg, Kate Kravits, Joy Goldsmith, Betty Ferrell, Rebecca Fujinami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Caring for the family is included as one of the eight domains of quality palliative care, calling attention to the importance of the family system and family communications about cancer during care and treatment of the disease. Previously, a model of family caregiver communication defined four caregiver communication types - Manager, Carrier, Partner, Lone - each with a unique communication pattern. The purpose of the present study was to extend the model of family caregiver communication in cancer care to further understand the impact of family communication burden on caregiving outcomes. Method: This mixed-method study employed fieldnotes from a family caregiver intervention focused on quality of life and self-reported caregiver communication items to identify a specific family caregiver type. Caregiver types were then analyzed using outcome measures on psychological distress, skills preparedness, family inventory of needs, and quality-of-life domains. Results: Corroboration between fieldnotes and self-reported communication for caregivers (n = 21, 16 women, mean age of 53 years) revealed a definitive classification of the four caregiver types (Manager = 6, Carrier = 5, Partner = 6, Lone = 4). Mean scores on self-reported communication items documented different communication patterns congruent with the theoretical framework of the model. Variation in caregiver outcomes measures confirmed the model of family caregiver communication types. Partner and Lone caregivers reported the lowest psychological distress, with Carrier caregivers feeling least prepared and Manager caregivers reporting the lowest physical quality of life. Significance of results: This study illustrates the impact of family communication on caregiving and increases our knowledge and understanding about the role of communication in caregiver burden. The research provides the first evidence-based validation for a family caregiver communication typology and its relationship to caregiver outcomes. Future research is needed to develop and test interventions that target specific caregiver types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalPalliative and Supportive Care
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Communication
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Quality of Health Care
Palliative Care
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer caregiver
  • Communication
  • Family caregiver
  • Mixed methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes. / Wittenberg, Elaine; Kravits, Kate; Goldsmith, Joy; Ferrell, Betty; Fujinami, Rebecca.

In: Palliative and Supportive Care, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wittenberg, Elaine ; Kravits, Kate ; Goldsmith, Joy ; Ferrell, Betty ; Fujinami, Rebecca. / Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes. In: Palliative and Supportive Care. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 3-11.
@article{ca40c898789d4017b176d061aa9c73c6,
title = "Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: Caring for the family is included as one of the eight domains of quality palliative care, calling attention to the importance of the family system and family communications about cancer during care and treatment of the disease. Previously, a model of family caregiver communication defined four caregiver communication types - Manager, Carrier, Partner, Lone - each with a unique communication pattern. The purpose of the present study was to extend the model of family caregiver communication in cancer care to further understand the impact of family communication burden on caregiving outcomes. Method: This mixed-method study employed fieldnotes from a family caregiver intervention focused on quality of life and self-reported caregiver communication items to identify a specific family caregiver type. Caregiver types were then analyzed using outcome measures on psychological distress, skills preparedness, family inventory of needs, and quality-of-life domains. Results: Corroboration between fieldnotes and self-reported communication for caregivers (n = 21, 16 women, mean age of 53 years) revealed a definitive classification of the four caregiver types (Manager = 6, Carrier = 5, Partner = 6, Lone = 4). Mean scores on self-reported communication items documented different communication patterns congruent with the theoretical framework of the model. Variation in caregiver outcomes measures confirmed the model of family caregiver communication types. Partner and Lone caregivers reported the lowest psychological distress, with Carrier caregivers feeling least prepared and Manager caregivers reporting the lowest physical quality of life. Significance of results: This study illustrates the impact of family communication on caregiving and increases our knowledge and understanding about the role of communication in caregiver burden. The research provides the first evidence-based validation for a family caregiver communication typology and its relationship to caregiver outcomes. Future research is needed to develop and test interventions that target specific caregiver types.",
keywords = "Cancer caregiver, Communication, Family caregiver, Mixed methods",
author = "Elaine Wittenberg and Kate Kravits and Joy Goldsmith and Betty Ferrell and Rebecca Fujinami",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1478951516000109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Palliative and Supportive Care",
issn = "1478-9515",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a model of family caregiver communication types and related caregiver outcomes

AU - Wittenberg, Elaine

AU - Kravits, Kate

AU - Goldsmith, Joy

AU - Ferrell, Betty

AU - Fujinami, Rebecca

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective: Caring for the family is included as one of the eight domains of quality palliative care, calling attention to the importance of the family system and family communications about cancer during care and treatment of the disease. Previously, a model of family caregiver communication defined four caregiver communication types - Manager, Carrier, Partner, Lone - each with a unique communication pattern. The purpose of the present study was to extend the model of family caregiver communication in cancer care to further understand the impact of family communication burden on caregiving outcomes. Method: This mixed-method study employed fieldnotes from a family caregiver intervention focused on quality of life and self-reported caregiver communication items to identify a specific family caregiver type. Caregiver types were then analyzed using outcome measures on psychological distress, skills preparedness, family inventory of needs, and quality-of-life domains. Results: Corroboration between fieldnotes and self-reported communication for caregivers (n = 21, 16 women, mean age of 53 years) revealed a definitive classification of the four caregiver types (Manager = 6, Carrier = 5, Partner = 6, Lone = 4). Mean scores on self-reported communication items documented different communication patterns congruent with the theoretical framework of the model. Variation in caregiver outcomes measures confirmed the model of family caregiver communication types. Partner and Lone caregivers reported the lowest psychological distress, with Carrier caregivers feeling least prepared and Manager caregivers reporting the lowest physical quality of life. Significance of results: This study illustrates the impact of family communication on caregiving and increases our knowledge and understanding about the role of communication in caregiver burden. The research provides the first evidence-based validation for a family caregiver communication typology and its relationship to caregiver outcomes. Future research is needed to develop and test interventions that target specific caregiver types.

AB - Objective: Caring for the family is included as one of the eight domains of quality palliative care, calling attention to the importance of the family system and family communications about cancer during care and treatment of the disease. Previously, a model of family caregiver communication defined four caregiver communication types - Manager, Carrier, Partner, Lone - each with a unique communication pattern. The purpose of the present study was to extend the model of family caregiver communication in cancer care to further understand the impact of family communication burden on caregiving outcomes. Method: This mixed-method study employed fieldnotes from a family caregiver intervention focused on quality of life and self-reported caregiver communication items to identify a specific family caregiver type. Caregiver types were then analyzed using outcome measures on psychological distress, skills preparedness, family inventory of needs, and quality-of-life domains. Results: Corroboration between fieldnotes and self-reported communication for caregivers (n = 21, 16 women, mean age of 53 years) revealed a definitive classification of the four caregiver types (Manager = 6, Carrier = 5, Partner = 6, Lone = 4). Mean scores on self-reported communication items documented different communication patterns congruent with the theoretical framework of the model. Variation in caregiver outcomes measures confirmed the model of family caregiver communication types. Partner and Lone caregivers reported the lowest psychological distress, with Carrier caregivers feeling least prepared and Manager caregivers reporting the lowest physical quality of life. Significance of results: This study illustrates the impact of family communication on caregiving and increases our knowledge and understanding about the role of communication in caregiver burden. The research provides the first evidence-based validation for a family caregiver communication typology and its relationship to caregiver outcomes. Future research is needed to develop and test interventions that target specific caregiver types.

KW - Cancer caregiver

KW - Communication

KW - Family caregiver

KW - Mixed methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962077738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962077738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1478951516000109

DO - 10.1017/S1478951516000109

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Palliative and Supportive Care

JF - Palliative and Supportive Care

SN - 1478-9515

IS - 1

ER -