Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges

Marcel Leist, Nina Hasiwa, Mardas Daneshian, Thomas Hartung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the "validation process" of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-22
Number of pages15
JournalToxicology Research
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Control
Quality control
Pyrogens
Industrial chemicals
Cosmetics
Neurotoxins
Testing
Biological Products
Skin
Animals
Vaccines
Corrosion
Animal Testing Alternatives
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Phototoxic Dermatitis
Drug Compounding
Toxicology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges. / Leist, Marcel; Hasiwa, Nina; Daneshian, Mardas; Hartung, Thomas.

In: Toxicology Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, p. 8-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leist, Marcel ; Hasiwa, Nina ; Daneshian, Mardas ; Hartung, Thomas. / Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges. In: Toxicology Research. 2012 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 8-22.
@article{07f86aebcabf4748b5af44f4a4cc793c,
title = "Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges",
abstract = "Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the {"}validation process{"} of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.",
author = "Marcel Leist and Nina Hasiwa and Mardas Daneshian and Thomas Hartung",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1039/c2tx20011b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "8--22",
journal = "Toxicology Research",
issn = "2045-452X",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges

AU - Leist, Marcel

AU - Hasiwa, Nina

AU - Daneshian, Mardas

AU - Hartung, Thomas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the "validation process" of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.

AB - Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the "validation process" of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864593532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864593532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c2tx20011b

DO - 10.1039/c2tx20011b

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864593532

VL - 1

SP - 8

EP - 22

JO - Toxicology Research

JF - Toxicology Research

SN - 2045-452X

IS - 1

ER -