Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures

Silviu C. Diaconu, Colton H.L. McNichols, Yuanyuan Liang, Dennis Orkoulas-Razis, Jhade Woodall, Yvonne M. Rasko, Michael Grant, Arthur J. Nam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandible fractures is debated. The purpose of this study is to analyze if patients undergoing ORIF with postoperative MMF have improved outcome compared with those treated with ORIF alone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent ORIF of isolated mandibular fractures. Patients were divided into those placed in MMF postoperatively (ORIF with MMF) and those who were not (ORIF only). Postoperative complications and follow-up compliance were compared. Results: A total of 238 patients were identified. Of these, 204 had sufficient follow-up with 94 patients in the ORIF with MMF group and 107 patients in the ORIF only group. Both groups had similar minor complication rates (13% vs 12%, P = 0.83) and major complication rates (16% vs 13%, P = 0.69). After adjusting for potential confounders, the use of postoperative MMF did not reduce the risk of minor (P = 0.34) or major complications (P = 0.57). Patients with postoperative MMF had a 5% lost to follow-up rate compared to 20% in the ORIF only group. Conclusion: Postoperative MMF does not improve clinical outcome after ORIF in patients with isolated mandible fractures but has the potential benefit of improving follow-up compliance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-936
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mandibular Fractures
Mandible
Internal Fracture Fixation
Lost to Follow-Up
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Fractures
  • mandible
  • mandibulomaxillary fixation
  • outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Diaconu, S. C., McNichols, C. H. L., Liang, Y., Orkoulas-Razis, D., Woodall, J., Rasko, Y. M., ... Nam, A. J. (2018). Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(4), 930-936. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004368

Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures. / Diaconu, Silviu C.; McNichols, Colton H.L.; Liang, Yuanyuan; Orkoulas-Razis, Dennis; Woodall, Jhade; Rasko, Yvonne M.; Grant, Michael; Nam, Arthur J.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.06.2018, p. 930-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diaconu, Silviu C. ; McNichols, Colton H.L. ; Liang, Yuanyuan ; Orkoulas-Razis, Dennis ; Woodall, Jhade ; Rasko, Yvonne M. ; Grant, Michael ; Nam, Arthur J. / Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 930-936.
@article{4c07549ada364b3c9bf0f8ea60190a73,
title = "Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures",
abstract = "Purpose: The utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandible fractures is debated. The purpose of this study is to analyze if patients undergoing ORIF with postoperative MMF have improved outcome compared with those treated with ORIF alone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent ORIF of isolated mandibular fractures. Patients were divided into those placed in MMF postoperatively (ORIF with MMF) and those who were not (ORIF only). Postoperative complications and follow-up compliance were compared. Results: A total of 238 patients were identified. Of these, 204 had sufficient follow-up with 94 patients in the ORIF with MMF group and 107 patients in the ORIF only group. Both groups had similar minor complication rates (13{\%} vs 12{\%}, P = 0.83) and major complication rates (16{\%} vs 13{\%}, P = 0.69). After adjusting for potential confounders, the use of postoperative MMF did not reduce the risk of minor (P = 0.34) or major complications (P = 0.57). Patients with postoperative MMF had a 5{\%} lost to follow-up rate compared to 20{\%} in the ORIF only group. Conclusion: Postoperative MMF does not improve clinical outcome after ORIF in patients with isolated mandible fractures but has the potential benefit of improving follow-up compliance.",
keywords = "Fractures, mandible, mandibulomaxillary fixation, outcomes",
author = "Diaconu, {Silviu C.} and McNichols, {Colton H.L.} and Yuanyuan Liang and Dennis Orkoulas-Razis and Jhade Woodall and Rasko, {Yvonne M.} and Michael Grant and Nam, {Arthur J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000004368",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "930--936",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation after rigid internal fixation of isolated mandibular fractures

AU - Diaconu, Silviu C.

AU - McNichols, Colton H.L.

AU - Liang, Yuanyuan

AU - Orkoulas-Razis, Dennis

AU - Woodall, Jhade

AU - Rasko, Yvonne M.

AU - Grant, Michael

AU - Nam, Arthur J.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Purpose: The utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandible fractures is debated. The purpose of this study is to analyze if patients undergoing ORIF with postoperative MMF have improved outcome compared with those treated with ORIF alone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent ORIF of isolated mandibular fractures. Patients were divided into those placed in MMF postoperatively (ORIF with MMF) and those who were not (ORIF only). Postoperative complications and follow-up compliance were compared. Results: A total of 238 patients were identified. Of these, 204 had sufficient follow-up with 94 patients in the ORIF with MMF group and 107 patients in the ORIF only group. Both groups had similar minor complication rates (13% vs 12%, P = 0.83) and major complication rates (16% vs 13%, P = 0.69). After adjusting for potential confounders, the use of postoperative MMF did not reduce the risk of minor (P = 0.34) or major complications (P = 0.57). Patients with postoperative MMF had a 5% lost to follow-up rate compared to 20% in the ORIF only group. Conclusion: Postoperative MMF does not improve clinical outcome after ORIF in patients with isolated mandible fractures but has the potential benefit of improving follow-up compliance.

AB - Purpose: The utility of postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandible fractures is debated. The purpose of this study is to analyze if patients undergoing ORIF with postoperative MMF have improved outcome compared with those treated with ORIF alone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent ORIF of isolated mandibular fractures. Patients were divided into those placed in MMF postoperatively (ORIF with MMF) and those who were not (ORIF only). Postoperative complications and follow-up compliance were compared. Results: A total of 238 patients were identified. Of these, 204 had sufficient follow-up with 94 patients in the ORIF with MMF group and 107 patients in the ORIF only group. Both groups had similar minor complication rates (13% vs 12%, P = 0.83) and major complication rates (16% vs 13%, P = 0.69). After adjusting for potential confounders, the use of postoperative MMF did not reduce the risk of minor (P = 0.34) or major complications (P = 0.57). Patients with postoperative MMF had a 5% lost to follow-up rate compared to 20% in the ORIF only group. Conclusion: Postoperative MMF does not improve clinical outcome after ORIF in patients with isolated mandible fractures but has the potential benefit of improving follow-up compliance.

KW - Fractures

KW - mandible

KW - mandibulomaxillary fixation

KW - outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048071456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048071456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004368

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004368

M3 - Article

C2 - 29750728

AN - SCOPUS:85048071456

VL - 29

SP - 930

EP - 936

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 4

ER -