Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital

S. Yukiko Asaki, Jeffrey W. Orcutt, Christina Y. Miyake, Henri Justino, Caridad de la Uz, Jeffrey J. Kim, Santiago O. Valdes, Athar M. Qureshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Interventional cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures are not routinely performed together. There are several perceived barriers affecting this practice, though there are also advantages for both the patient and practitioner to a combined approach. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study reviewing combined cath and EP procedures with a preprocedural intention to intervene at Texas Children's Hospital from 2001 to 2014. We excluded procedures in which the intended procedure was purely diagnostic in nature. Results: A total of 121 patients requiring 125 procedures were identified, of which 61 patients underwent 62 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. Potential subgroups of interest included adult congenital heart disease patients (26% of cohort), single ventricle anatomy (34%), and heterotaxy (19%) and collectively 58% of procedures involved a patient in one of these groups. The combined nature of the procedure did not preclude a cath or EP intervention in any patient. There were no mortalities. There were three adverse events, affecting 4.8% of procedures. Conclusions: Combined interventional cardiac cath and EP procedures in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease can be performed safely in a high-volume center. These combined procedures save patients the risk and inconvenience of multiple procedures, and further investigation into cost savings is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-666
Number of pages6
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrophysiology
Catheterization
Safety
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Cardiac Catheterization
Heart Diseases
Cost Savings
Anatomy
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • ablation
  • electrophysiology – clinical
  • pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital. / Asaki, S. Yukiko; Orcutt, Jeffrey W.; Miyake, Christina Y.; Justino, Henri; de la Uz, Caridad; Kim, Jeffrey J.; Valdes, Santiago O.; Qureshi, Athar M.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 661-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Asaki, S. Yukiko ; Orcutt, Jeffrey W. ; Miyake, Christina Y. ; Justino, Henri ; de la Uz, Caridad ; Kim, Jeffrey J. ; Valdes, Santiago O. ; Qureshi, Athar M. / Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2017 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 661-666.
@article{47f303bacb7647068b3cb92d95e6040d,
title = "Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital",
abstract = "Background: Interventional cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures are not routinely performed together. There are several perceived barriers affecting this practice, though there are also advantages for both the patient and practitioner to a combined approach. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study reviewing combined cath and EP procedures with a preprocedural intention to intervene at Texas Children's Hospital from 2001 to 2014. We excluded procedures in which the intended procedure was purely diagnostic in nature. Results: A total of 121 patients requiring 125 procedures were identified, of which 61 patients underwent 62 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. Potential subgroups of interest included adult congenital heart disease patients (26{\%} of cohort), single ventricle anatomy (34{\%}), and heterotaxy (19{\%}) and collectively 58{\%} of procedures involved a patient in one of these groups. The combined nature of the procedure did not preclude a cath or EP intervention in any patient. There were no mortalities. There were three adverse events, affecting 4.8{\%} of procedures. Conclusions: Combined interventional cardiac cath and EP procedures in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease can be performed safely in a high-volume center. These combined procedures save patients the risk and inconvenience of multiple procedures, and further investigation into cost savings is warranted.",
keywords = "ablation, electrophysiology – clinical, pediatrics",
author = "Asaki, {S. Yukiko} and Orcutt, {Jeffrey W.} and Miyake, {Christina Y.} and Henri Justino and {de la Uz}, Caridad and Kim, {Jeffrey J.} and Valdes, {Santiago O.} and Qureshi, {Athar M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pace.13047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "661--666",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital

AU - Asaki, S. Yukiko

AU - Orcutt, Jeffrey W.

AU - Miyake, Christina Y.

AU - Justino, Henri

AU - de la Uz, Caridad

AU - Kim, Jeffrey J.

AU - Valdes, Santiago O.

AU - Qureshi, Athar M.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Background: Interventional cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures are not routinely performed together. There are several perceived barriers affecting this practice, though there are also advantages for both the patient and practitioner to a combined approach. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study reviewing combined cath and EP procedures with a preprocedural intention to intervene at Texas Children's Hospital from 2001 to 2014. We excluded procedures in which the intended procedure was purely diagnostic in nature. Results: A total of 121 patients requiring 125 procedures were identified, of which 61 patients underwent 62 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. Potential subgroups of interest included adult congenital heart disease patients (26% of cohort), single ventricle anatomy (34%), and heterotaxy (19%) and collectively 58% of procedures involved a patient in one of these groups. The combined nature of the procedure did not preclude a cath or EP intervention in any patient. There were no mortalities. There were three adverse events, affecting 4.8% of procedures. Conclusions: Combined interventional cardiac cath and EP procedures in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease can be performed safely in a high-volume center. These combined procedures save patients the risk and inconvenience of multiple procedures, and further investigation into cost savings is warranted.

AB - Background: Interventional cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures are not routinely performed together. There are several perceived barriers affecting this practice, though there are also advantages for both the patient and practitioner to a combined approach. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study reviewing combined cath and EP procedures with a preprocedural intention to intervene at Texas Children's Hospital from 2001 to 2014. We excluded procedures in which the intended procedure was purely diagnostic in nature. Results: A total of 121 patients requiring 125 procedures were identified, of which 61 patients underwent 62 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. Potential subgroups of interest included adult congenital heart disease patients (26% of cohort), single ventricle anatomy (34%), and heterotaxy (19%) and collectively 58% of procedures involved a patient in one of these groups. The combined nature of the procedure did not preclude a cath or EP intervention in any patient. There were no mortalities. There were three adverse events, affecting 4.8% of procedures. Conclusions: Combined interventional cardiac cath and EP procedures in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease can be performed safely in a high-volume center. These combined procedures save patients the risk and inconvenience of multiple procedures, and further investigation into cost savings is warranted.

KW - ablation

KW - electrophysiology – clinical

KW - pediatrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018782917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018782917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pace.13047

DO - 10.1111/pace.13047

M3 - Article

C2 - 28191656

AN - SCOPUS:85018782917

VL - 40

SP - 661

EP - 666

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 6

ER -