Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: Experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda

Ligia Paina, Annie Wilkinson, Moses Tetui, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Debjani Barman, Tanvir Ahmed, Shehrin Shaila Mahmood, Gerry Bloom, Jeff Knezovich, Asha George, Sara C Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. Methods: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams' experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. Results: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams' experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams' initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. Conclusions: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 28 2017

Fingerprint

Uganda
Bangladesh
India
Health
Research
Social Responsibility
Health Systems Plans
Communication
Program Evaluation
Motivation
Learning

Keywords

  • Bangladesh
  • India
  • Learning by doing
  • Theory of change
  • Uganda

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation : Experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda. / Paina, Ligia; Wilkinson, Annie; Tetui, Moses; Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth; Barman, Debjani; Ahmed, Tanvir; Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila; Bloom, Gerry; Knezovich, Jeff; George, Asha; Bennett, Sara C.

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 15, 109, 28.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paina, Ligia ; Wilkinson, Annie ; Tetui, Moses ; Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth ; Barman, Debjani ; Ahmed, Tanvir ; Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila ; Bloom, Gerry ; Knezovich, Jeff ; George, Asha ; Bennett, Sara C. / Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation : Experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2017 ; Vol. 15.
@article{0a761872857949ceaefbe8a700584866,
title = "Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: Experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda",
abstract = "Background: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. Methods: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams' experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. Results: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams' experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams' initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. Conclusions: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, India, Learning by doing, Theory of change, Uganda",
author = "Ligia Paina and Annie Wilkinson and Moses Tetui and Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho and Debjani Barman and Tanvir Ahmed and Mahmood, {Shehrin Shaila} and Gerry Bloom and Jeff Knezovich and Asha George and Bennett, {Sara C}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Health Research Policy and Systems",
issn = "1478-4505",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation

T2 - Experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda

AU - Paina, Ligia

AU - Wilkinson, Annie

AU - Tetui, Moses

AU - Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth

AU - Barman, Debjani

AU - Ahmed, Tanvir

AU - Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila

AU - Bloom, Gerry

AU - Knezovich, Jeff

AU - George, Asha

AU - Bennett, Sara C

PY - 2017/12/28

Y1 - 2017/12/28

N2 - Background: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. Methods: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams' experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. Results: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams' experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams' initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. Conclusions: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.

AB - Background: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. Methods: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams' experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. Results: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams' experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams' initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. Conclusions: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - India

KW - Learning by doing

KW - Theory of change

KW - Uganda

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039756637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039756637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y

DO - 10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 29297374

AN - SCOPUS:85039756637

VL - 15

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

M1 - 109

ER -