Using Propensity Score Matching to Estimate an “Unbiased Effect-Size” Between Women’s Employment and Partner Violence in Tanzania

Seema Vyas, Lori Heise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Estimates of the effect of employment on women’s risk of partner violence in cross-sectional studies are subject to potential “self-selection bias.” Women’s personal choice of whether to pursue employment or not may create fundamental differences between the group of women who are employed and those who are not employed that standard regression methods cannot account for even after adjusting for confounding. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of propensity score matching (PSM), a technique used widely in econometrics, to address this bias in cross-sectional studies. We use PSM to estimate an unbiased effect-size of women’s employment on their risk of experiencing partner violence in urban and rural Tanzania using data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Three different measures of women’s employment were analyzed: whether they had engaged in any productive work outside of the home in the past year, whether they received payment in cash for this productive work, and whether their employment was stable. Women who worked outside of the home were significantly different from those who did not. In both urban and rural Tanzania, women’s risk of violence appears higher among women who worked in the past year than among those who did not, even after using PSM to account for underlying differences in these two groups of women. Being paid in cash reversed this effect in rural areas whereas stability of employment reduced this risk in urban centers. The estimated size of effect varied by type of matching estimator, but the direction of the association remained largely consistent. This study’s findings suggest substantial self-selection into employment. PSM methods, by compensating for this bias, appear to be a useful tool for estimating the relationship between women’s employment and partner violence in cross-sectional studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2971-2990
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume29
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Tanzania
Violence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Selection Bias
Demography

Keywords

  • partner violence
  • propensity score matching
  • self-selection bias
  • Tanzania
  • women’s employment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{6ba72ffaebe14f83acc9ca796f7bca81,
title = "Using Propensity Score Matching to Estimate an “Unbiased Effect-Size” Between Women’s Employment and Partner Violence in Tanzania",
abstract = "Estimates of the effect of employment on women’s risk of partner violence in cross-sectional studies are subject to potential “self-selection bias.” Women’s personal choice of whether to pursue employment or not may create fundamental differences between the group of women who are employed and those who are not employed that standard regression methods cannot account for even after adjusting for confounding. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of propensity score matching (PSM), a technique used widely in econometrics, to address this bias in cross-sectional studies. We use PSM to estimate an unbiased effect-size of women’s employment on their risk of experiencing partner violence in urban and rural Tanzania using data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Three different measures of women’s employment were analyzed: whether they had engaged in any productive work outside of the home in the past year, whether they received payment in cash for this productive work, and whether their employment was stable. Women who worked outside of the home were significantly different from those who did not. In both urban and rural Tanzania, women’s risk of violence appears higher among women who worked in the past year than among those who did not, even after using PSM to account for underlying differences in these two groups of women. Being paid in cash reversed this effect in rural areas whereas stability of employment reduced this risk in urban centers. The estimated size of effect varied by type of matching estimator, but the direction of the association remained largely consistent. This study’s findings suggest substantial self-selection into employment. PSM methods, by compensating for this bias, appear to be a useful tool for estimating the relationship between women’s employment and partner violence in cross-sectional studies.",
keywords = "partner violence, propensity score matching, self-selection bias, Tanzania, women’s employment",
author = "Seema Vyas and Lori Heise",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260514527823",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "2971--2990",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Propensity Score Matching to Estimate an “Unbiased Effect-Size” Between Women’s Employment and Partner Violence in Tanzania

AU - Vyas, Seema

AU - Heise, Lori

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Estimates of the effect of employment on women’s risk of partner violence in cross-sectional studies are subject to potential “self-selection bias.” Women’s personal choice of whether to pursue employment or not may create fundamental differences between the group of women who are employed and those who are not employed that standard regression methods cannot account for even after adjusting for confounding. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of propensity score matching (PSM), a technique used widely in econometrics, to address this bias in cross-sectional studies. We use PSM to estimate an unbiased effect-size of women’s employment on their risk of experiencing partner violence in urban and rural Tanzania using data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Three different measures of women’s employment were analyzed: whether they had engaged in any productive work outside of the home in the past year, whether they received payment in cash for this productive work, and whether their employment was stable. Women who worked outside of the home were significantly different from those who did not. In both urban and rural Tanzania, women’s risk of violence appears higher among women who worked in the past year than among those who did not, even after using PSM to account for underlying differences in these two groups of women. Being paid in cash reversed this effect in rural areas whereas stability of employment reduced this risk in urban centers. The estimated size of effect varied by type of matching estimator, but the direction of the association remained largely consistent. This study’s findings suggest substantial self-selection into employment. PSM methods, by compensating for this bias, appear to be a useful tool for estimating the relationship between women’s employment and partner violence in cross-sectional studies.

AB - Estimates of the effect of employment on women’s risk of partner violence in cross-sectional studies are subject to potential “self-selection bias.” Women’s personal choice of whether to pursue employment or not may create fundamental differences between the group of women who are employed and those who are not employed that standard regression methods cannot account for even after adjusting for confounding. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of propensity score matching (PSM), a technique used widely in econometrics, to address this bias in cross-sectional studies. We use PSM to estimate an unbiased effect-size of women’s employment on their risk of experiencing partner violence in urban and rural Tanzania using data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Three different measures of women’s employment were analyzed: whether they had engaged in any productive work outside of the home in the past year, whether they received payment in cash for this productive work, and whether their employment was stable. Women who worked outside of the home were significantly different from those who did not. In both urban and rural Tanzania, women’s risk of violence appears higher among women who worked in the past year than among those who did not, even after using PSM to account for underlying differences in these two groups of women. Being paid in cash reversed this effect in rural areas whereas stability of employment reduced this risk in urban centers. The estimated size of effect varied by type of matching estimator, but the direction of the association remained largely consistent. This study’s findings suggest substantial self-selection into employment. PSM methods, by compensating for this bias, appear to be a useful tool for estimating the relationship between women’s employment and partner violence in cross-sectional studies.

KW - partner violence

KW - propensity score matching

KW - self-selection bias

KW - Tanzania

KW - women’s employment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907168921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907168921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260514527823

DO - 10.1177/0886260514527823

M3 - Article

C2 - 24729130

AN - SCOPUS:84907168921

VL - 29

SP - 2971

EP - 2990

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 16

ER -