Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan

An exploratory study

Cherrie L. Evans, Young-MI Kim, Khalid Yari, Nasratullah Ansari, Hannah Tappis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: As part of a National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment, a special study was undertaken in July 2010 to examine the quality of cesarean deliveries in Afghanistan and examine the utility of direct clinical observation as an assessment method in low-resource settings.Methods: This cross-sectional assessment of the quality of cesareans at 14 facilities in Afghanistan included a survey of surgeons regarding their routine cesarean practices, direct observation of 29 cesarean deliveries and comparison of observations with facility records for 34 additional cesareans conducted during the 3 days prior to the observation period at each facility. For both observed cases and record reviews, we assessed time intervals between specified points of care-arrival to the ward, first evaluation, detection of a complication, decision for cesarean, incision, and birth.Results: All time intervals with the exception of " decision to skin incision" were longer in the record reviews than in observed cases. Prior cesarean was the most common primary indication for all cases. All mothers in both groups observed survived through one hour postpartum. Among newborns there were two stillbirths (7%) in observed births and seven (21%) record reviews. Although our sample is too small to show statistical significance, the difference is noteworthy. In six of the reviewed cesareans resulting in stillbirth, a fetal heart rate was recorded in the operating theater, although four were recorded as macerated. For the two fresh stillbirths, the cesarean surgeries were recorded as scheduled and not urgent.Conclusions: Direct observation of cesarean deliveries enabled us to assess a number of preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative procedures that are often not described in medical records in low resource settings. Comparison of observations with findings from provider interviews and facility records allowed us to infer whether observed practices were typical of providers and facilities and detect potential Hawthorne effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number176
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 2014

Fingerprint

Afghanistan
Stillbirth
Observation
Point-of-Care Systems
Parturition
Newborn Infant
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Fetal Heart Rate
Needs Assessment
Postoperative Care
Postpartum Period
Obstetrics
Medical Records
Emergencies
Mothers
Interviews
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan : An exploratory study. / Evans, Cherrie L.; Kim, Young-MI; Yari, Khalid; Ansari, Nasratullah; Tappis, Hannah.

In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 14, No. 1, 176, 27.05.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, Cherrie L. ; Kim, Young-MI ; Yari, Khalid ; Ansari, Nasratullah ; Tappis, Hannah. / Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan : An exploratory study. In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{8633ca2c9e064d86a0288dd70b2b42eb,
title = "Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan: An exploratory study",
abstract = "Background: As part of a National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment, a special study was undertaken in July 2010 to examine the quality of cesarean deliveries in Afghanistan and examine the utility of direct clinical observation as an assessment method in low-resource settings.Methods: This cross-sectional assessment of the quality of cesareans at 14 facilities in Afghanistan included a survey of surgeons regarding their routine cesarean practices, direct observation of 29 cesarean deliveries and comparison of observations with facility records for 34 additional cesareans conducted during the 3 days prior to the observation period at each facility. For both observed cases and record reviews, we assessed time intervals between specified points of care-arrival to the ward, first evaluation, detection of a complication, decision for cesarean, incision, and birth.Results: All time intervals with the exception of {"} decision to skin incision{"} were longer in the record reviews than in observed cases. Prior cesarean was the most common primary indication for all cases. All mothers in both groups observed survived through one hour postpartum. Among newborns there were two stillbirths (7{\%}) in observed births and seven (21{\%}) record reviews. Although our sample is too small to show statistical significance, the difference is noteworthy. In six of the reviewed cesareans resulting in stillbirth, a fetal heart rate was recorded in the operating theater, although four were recorded as macerated. For the two fresh stillbirths, the cesarean surgeries were recorded as scheduled and not urgent.Conclusions: Direct observation of cesarean deliveries enabled us to assess a number of preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative procedures that are often not described in medical records in low resource settings. Comparison of observations with findings from provider interviews and facility records allowed us to infer whether observed practices were typical of providers and facilities and detect potential Hawthorne effects.",
author = "Evans, {Cherrie L.} and Young-MI Kim and Khalid Yari and Nasratullah Ansari and Hannah Tappis",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2393-14-176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth",
issn = "1471-2393",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using direct clinical observation to assess the quality of cesarean delivery in Afghanistan

T2 - An exploratory study

AU - Evans, Cherrie L.

AU - Kim, Young-MI

AU - Yari, Khalid

AU - Ansari, Nasratullah

AU - Tappis, Hannah

PY - 2014/5/27

Y1 - 2014/5/27

N2 - Background: As part of a National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment, a special study was undertaken in July 2010 to examine the quality of cesarean deliveries in Afghanistan and examine the utility of direct clinical observation as an assessment method in low-resource settings.Methods: This cross-sectional assessment of the quality of cesareans at 14 facilities in Afghanistan included a survey of surgeons regarding their routine cesarean practices, direct observation of 29 cesarean deliveries and comparison of observations with facility records for 34 additional cesareans conducted during the 3 days prior to the observation period at each facility. For both observed cases and record reviews, we assessed time intervals between specified points of care-arrival to the ward, first evaluation, detection of a complication, decision for cesarean, incision, and birth.Results: All time intervals with the exception of " decision to skin incision" were longer in the record reviews than in observed cases. Prior cesarean was the most common primary indication for all cases. All mothers in both groups observed survived through one hour postpartum. Among newborns there were two stillbirths (7%) in observed births and seven (21%) record reviews. Although our sample is too small to show statistical significance, the difference is noteworthy. In six of the reviewed cesareans resulting in stillbirth, a fetal heart rate was recorded in the operating theater, although four were recorded as macerated. For the two fresh stillbirths, the cesarean surgeries were recorded as scheduled and not urgent.Conclusions: Direct observation of cesarean deliveries enabled us to assess a number of preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative procedures that are often not described in medical records in low resource settings. Comparison of observations with findings from provider interviews and facility records allowed us to infer whether observed practices were typical of providers and facilities and detect potential Hawthorne effects.

AB - Background: As part of a National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment, a special study was undertaken in July 2010 to examine the quality of cesarean deliveries in Afghanistan and examine the utility of direct clinical observation as an assessment method in low-resource settings.Methods: This cross-sectional assessment of the quality of cesareans at 14 facilities in Afghanistan included a survey of surgeons regarding their routine cesarean practices, direct observation of 29 cesarean deliveries and comparison of observations with facility records for 34 additional cesareans conducted during the 3 days prior to the observation period at each facility. For both observed cases and record reviews, we assessed time intervals between specified points of care-arrival to the ward, first evaluation, detection of a complication, decision for cesarean, incision, and birth.Results: All time intervals with the exception of " decision to skin incision" were longer in the record reviews than in observed cases. Prior cesarean was the most common primary indication for all cases. All mothers in both groups observed survived through one hour postpartum. Among newborns there were two stillbirths (7%) in observed births and seven (21%) record reviews. Although our sample is too small to show statistical significance, the difference is noteworthy. In six of the reviewed cesareans resulting in stillbirth, a fetal heart rate was recorded in the operating theater, although four were recorded as macerated. For the two fresh stillbirths, the cesarean surgeries were recorded as scheduled and not urgent.Conclusions: Direct observation of cesarean deliveries enabled us to assess a number of preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative procedures that are often not described in medical records in low resource settings. Comparison of observations with findings from provider interviews and facility records allowed us to infer whether observed practices were typical of providers and facilities and detect potential Hawthorne effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902546973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902546973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2393-14-176

DO - 10.1186/1471-2393-14-176

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

SN - 1471-2393

IS - 1

M1 - 176

ER -