Using cost-effectiveness league tables to compare interventions to prevent sexual transmission of HIV

Steven D. Pinkerton, Ana P. Johnson-Masotti, David R. Holtgrave, Paul G. Farnham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness information is needed to help public health decision makers choose between competing HIV prevention programs. One way to organize this information is in a 'league table' that lists cost-effectiveness ratios for different interventions and which facilitates comparisons across interventions. Herein we propose a common outcome measure for use in HIV prevention league tables and present a preliminary league table of interventions to reduce sexual transmission of HIV in the US. Fifteen studies encompassing 29 intervention for different population groups are included in the table. Approximately half of the interventions are cost-saving (i.e. save society money, in the long run), and three-quarters are cost-effective by conventional standards. We discuss the utility of such a table for informing the HIV prevention resource allocation process and delineate some of the difficulties associated with the league table approach, especially as applied to HIV prevention cost-effectiveness analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)917-928
Number of pages12
JournalAIDS
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2001

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Economic analysis
  • HIV
  • Prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using cost-effectiveness league tables to compare interventions to prevent sexual transmission of HIV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this