Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study

Yea-Jen Hsu, Andrzej S. Kosinski, Amelia S. Wallace, Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri, Bickey H. Chang, Kathleen Speck, Michael Rosen, Ayse Gurses, Anping Xie, Shu Huang, Duke E. Cameron, David Thompson, Jill A Marsteller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: To assess the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. Methods: We compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals (infection reduction protocols plus safety culture intervention) and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals (feedback only). Results: Improvement trends in several outcomes among the intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. Conclusion: Using external databases such as those of professional societies may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures and longer follow-up. This can better inform evaluation of continuous QI in healthcare organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-32
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Databases
Safety Management
Propensity Score
Cross Infection
Thoracic Surgery
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care
Infection

Keywords

  • cardiac surgery
  • hospital-acquired infections
  • patient safety
  • program evaluation
  • quality improvement
  • secondary data analysis
  • study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative : The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study. / Hsu, Yea-Jen; Kosinski, Andrzej S.; Wallace, Amelia S.; Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita; Chang, Bickey H.; Speck, Kathleen; Rosen, Michael; Gurses, Ayse; Xie, Anping; Huang, Shu; Cameron, Duke E.; Thompson, David; Marsteller, Jill A.

In: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 21-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsu, Yea-Jen ; Kosinski, Andrzej S. ; Wallace, Amelia S. ; Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita ; Chang, Bickey H. ; Speck, Kathleen ; Rosen, Michael ; Gurses, Ayse ; Xie, Anping ; Huang, Shu ; Cameron, Duke E. ; Thompson, David ; Marsteller, Jill A. / Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative : The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study. In: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 21-32.
@article{192d2b0b2a9d4b3f978ff8cf9ce9fc30,
title = "Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study",
abstract = "Aim: To assess the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. Methods: We compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals (infection reduction protocols plus safety culture intervention) and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals (feedback only). Results: Improvement trends in several outcomes among the intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. Conclusion: Using external databases such as those of professional societies may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures and longer follow-up. This can better inform evaluation of continuous QI in healthcare organizations.",
keywords = "cardiac surgery, hospital-acquired infections, patient safety, program evaluation, quality improvement, secondary data analysis, study design",
author = "Yea-Jen Hsu and Kosinski, {Andrzej S.} and Wallace, {Amelia S.} and Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri and Chang, {Bickey H.} and Kathleen Speck and Michael Rosen and Ayse Gurses and Anping Xie and Shu Huang and Cameron, {Duke E.} and David Thompson and Marsteller, {Jill A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2217/cer-2018-0051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "21--32",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research",
issn = "2042-6305",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative

T2 - The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study

AU - Hsu, Yea-Jen

AU - Kosinski, Andrzej S.

AU - Wallace, Amelia S.

AU - Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita

AU - Chang, Bickey H.

AU - Speck, Kathleen

AU - Rosen, Michael

AU - Gurses, Ayse

AU - Xie, Anping

AU - Huang, Shu

AU - Cameron, Duke E.

AU - Thompson, David

AU - Marsteller, Jill A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Aim: To assess the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. Methods: We compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals (infection reduction protocols plus safety culture intervention) and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals (feedback only). Results: Improvement trends in several outcomes among the intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. Conclusion: Using external databases such as those of professional societies may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures and longer follow-up. This can better inform evaluation of continuous QI in healthcare organizations.

AB - Aim: To assess the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. Methods: We compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals (infection reduction protocols plus safety culture intervention) and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals (feedback only). Results: Improvement trends in several outcomes among the intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. Conclusion: Using external databases such as those of professional societies may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures and longer follow-up. This can better inform evaluation of continuous QI in healthcare organizations.

KW - cardiac surgery

KW - hospital-acquired infections

KW - patient safety

KW - program evaluation

KW - quality improvement

KW - secondary data analysis

KW - study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058739726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058739726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/cer-2018-0051

DO - 10.2217/cer-2018-0051

M3 - Article

C2 - 30525958

AN - SCOPUS:85058739726

VL - 8

SP - 21

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

JF - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

SN - 2042-6305

IS - 1

ER -