Using a human-centered design approach for collaborative decision-making in pediatric asthma care

A. Eberhart, B. Slogeris, Christy Sadreameli, Mandeep S Jassal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Human-centered design (HCD) is a qualitative methodology that empathizes with end-users and assists in formulating preferable and practical interventions. We explored the utility of HCD in improving pediatric asthma healthcare outcomes among patient and caregiver populations within an urban academic center. Study design: HCD employs a multiphase process that aims to identify the needs of end users and reframe solutions around each stakeholder's preference patterns. Methods: Ethnographic-style observations were initiated among pediatric asthma healthcare providers, community environmental activists, local government public health officials, households with a young child (<12 years of age) with asthma, and adolescent asthmatics. Common themes from the observations served as the basis for understanding users' experiences and determining actionable areas of improvement within outpatient asthma care. Multistakeholder brainstorming sessions led to the emergence of three prototypes that underwent low-fidelity field testing. Results: The first prototype elucidated caregivers' preferred outpatient asthma support systems using a newly created visual decision-making aid. The second constructed prototype was a child-oriented asthma activity sheet that allowed children to better communicate their understanding and impact of asthma care. The final prototype attempted to improve interactions between providers, caregivers, and children/adolescents using visual prompts to enhance empathetic and clinically-relevant dialogue. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse population of relevant stakeholders in disease processes that use design thinking yield relevant solutions with enhanced community buy-in. The prototypes are continuing to undergo iterative field testing in local community and academic asthma care sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-132
Number of pages4
JournalPublic Health
Volume170
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Asthma
Pediatrics
Caregivers
Local Government
Urban Population
Decision Support Techniques
Ambulatory Care
Health Personnel
Outpatients
Public Health
Delivery of Health Care
Population

Keywords

  • Design thinking
  • End-user design
  • Health equity
  • Human-centered design
  • Pediatric asthma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Using a human-centered design approach for collaborative decision-making in pediatric asthma care. / Eberhart, A.; Slogeris, B.; Sadreameli, Christy; Jassal, Mandeep S.

In: Public Health, Vol. 170, 01.05.2019, p. 129-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f6b679ca1014f2996f0426f7723354f,
title = "Using a human-centered design approach for collaborative decision-making in pediatric asthma care",
abstract = "Objectives: Human-centered design (HCD) is a qualitative methodology that empathizes with end-users and assists in formulating preferable and practical interventions. We explored the utility of HCD in improving pediatric asthma healthcare outcomes among patient and caregiver populations within an urban academic center. Study design: HCD employs a multiphase process that aims to identify the needs of end users and reframe solutions around each stakeholder's preference patterns. Methods: Ethnographic-style observations were initiated among pediatric asthma healthcare providers, community environmental activists, local government public health officials, households with a young child (<12 years of age) with asthma, and adolescent asthmatics. Common themes from the observations served as the basis for understanding users' experiences and determining actionable areas of improvement within outpatient asthma care. Multistakeholder brainstorming sessions led to the emergence of three prototypes that underwent low-fidelity field testing. Results: The first prototype elucidated caregivers' preferred outpatient asthma support systems using a newly created visual decision-making aid. The second constructed prototype was a child-oriented asthma activity sheet that allowed children to better communicate their understanding and impact of asthma care. The final prototype attempted to improve interactions between providers, caregivers, and children/adolescents using visual prompts to enhance empathetic and clinically-relevant dialogue. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse population of relevant stakeholders in disease processes that use design thinking yield relevant solutions with enhanced community buy-in. The prototypes are continuing to undergo iterative field testing in local community and academic asthma care sites.",
keywords = "Design thinking, End-user design, Health equity, Human-centered design, Pediatric asthma",
author = "A. Eberhart and B. Slogeris and Christy Sadreameli and Jassal, {Mandeep S}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "129--132",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a human-centered design approach for collaborative decision-making in pediatric asthma care

AU - Eberhart, A.

AU - Slogeris, B.

AU - Sadreameli, Christy

AU - Jassal, Mandeep S

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objectives: Human-centered design (HCD) is a qualitative methodology that empathizes with end-users and assists in formulating preferable and practical interventions. We explored the utility of HCD in improving pediatric asthma healthcare outcomes among patient and caregiver populations within an urban academic center. Study design: HCD employs a multiphase process that aims to identify the needs of end users and reframe solutions around each stakeholder's preference patterns. Methods: Ethnographic-style observations were initiated among pediatric asthma healthcare providers, community environmental activists, local government public health officials, households with a young child (<12 years of age) with asthma, and adolescent asthmatics. Common themes from the observations served as the basis for understanding users' experiences and determining actionable areas of improvement within outpatient asthma care. Multistakeholder brainstorming sessions led to the emergence of three prototypes that underwent low-fidelity field testing. Results: The first prototype elucidated caregivers' preferred outpatient asthma support systems using a newly created visual decision-making aid. The second constructed prototype was a child-oriented asthma activity sheet that allowed children to better communicate their understanding and impact of asthma care. The final prototype attempted to improve interactions between providers, caregivers, and children/adolescents using visual prompts to enhance empathetic and clinically-relevant dialogue. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse population of relevant stakeholders in disease processes that use design thinking yield relevant solutions with enhanced community buy-in. The prototypes are continuing to undergo iterative field testing in local community and academic asthma care sites.

AB - Objectives: Human-centered design (HCD) is a qualitative methodology that empathizes with end-users and assists in formulating preferable and practical interventions. We explored the utility of HCD in improving pediatric asthma healthcare outcomes among patient and caregiver populations within an urban academic center. Study design: HCD employs a multiphase process that aims to identify the needs of end users and reframe solutions around each stakeholder's preference patterns. Methods: Ethnographic-style observations were initiated among pediatric asthma healthcare providers, community environmental activists, local government public health officials, households with a young child (<12 years of age) with asthma, and adolescent asthmatics. Common themes from the observations served as the basis for understanding users' experiences and determining actionable areas of improvement within outpatient asthma care. Multistakeholder brainstorming sessions led to the emergence of three prototypes that underwent low-fidelity field testing. Results: The first prototype elucidated caregivers' preferred outpatient asthma support systems using a newly created visual decision-making aid. The second constructed prototype was a child-oriented asthma activity sheet that allowed children to better communicate their understanding and impact of asthma care. The final prototype attempted to improve interactions between providers, caregivers, and children/adolescents using visual prompts to enhance empathetic and clinically-relevant dialogue. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse population of relevant stakeholders in disease processes that use design thinking yield relevant solutions with enhanced community buy-in. The prototypes are continuing to undergo iterative field testing in local community and academic asthma care sites.

KW - Design thinking

KW - End-user design

KW - Health equity

KW - Human-centered design

KW - Pediatric asthma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064592677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064592677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 31035123

AN - SCOPUS:85064592677

VL - 170

SP - 129

EP - 132

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

ER -