Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention

Rajiv N. Rimal, Hee Soon Juon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The risk perception attitude (RPA) framework classifies people into 4 groups based on their perceptions of risk and personal efficacy: responsive (high risk, high efficacy), avoidance (high risk, low efficacy), proactive (low risk, high efficacy), and indifference (low risk, low efficacy). This study tested the central propositions from the RPA framework among a group of immigrant Indian women (N = 413) in the Washington, DC area in their propensity to pay attention to breast cancer information and engage in self-exams and clinical screening. Self-efficacy and knowledge about breast cancer were consistent predictors of these outcomes. Use of the RPA framework explained 16% to 27% of the variance. Implications for breast cancer prevention campaigns are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-310
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Self Efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. / Rimal, Rajiv N.; Juon, Hee Soon.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 287-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef184bef7a154b24a407dd2f0cb56c28,
title = "Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention",
abstract = "The risk perception attitude (RPA) framework classifies people into 4 groups based on their perceptions of risk and personal efficacy: responsive (high risk, high efficacy), avoidance (high risk, low efficacy), proactive (low risk, high efficacy), and indifference (low risk, low efficacy). This study tested the central propositions from the RPA framework among a group of immigrant Indian women (N = 413) in the Washington, DC area in their propensity to pay attention to breast cancer information and engage in self-exams and clinical screening. Self-efficacy and knowledge about breast cancer were consistent predictors of these outcomes. Use of the RPA framework explained 16{\%} to 27{\%} of the variance. Implications for breast cancer prevention campaigns are discussed.",
author = "Rimal, {Rajiv N.} and Juon, {Hee Soon}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "287--310",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention

AU - Rimal, Rajiv N.

AU - Juon, Hee Soon

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - The risk perception attitude (RPA) framework classifies people into 4 groups based on their perceptions of risk and personal efficacy: responsive (high risk, high efficacy), avoidance (high risk, low efficacy), proactive (low risk, high efficacy), and indifference (low risk, low efficacy). This study tested the central propositions from the RPA framework among a group of immigrant Indian women (N = 413) in the Washington, DC area in their propensity to pay attention to breast cancer information and engage in self-exams and clinical screening. Self-efficacy and knowledge about breast cancer were consistent predictors of these outcomes. Use of the RPA framework explained 16% to 27% of the variance. Implications for breast cancer prevention campaigns are discussed.

AB - The risk perception attitude (RPA) framework classifies people into 4 groups based on their perceptions of risk and personal efficacy: responsive (high risk, high efficacy), avoidance (high risk, low efficacy), proactive (low risk, high efficacy), and indifference (low risk, low efficacy). This study tested the central propositions from the RPA framework among a group of immigrant Indian women (N = 413) in the Washington, DC area in their propensity to pay attention to breast cancer information and engage in self-exams and clinical screening. Self-efficacy and knowledge about breast cancer were consistent predictors of these outcomes. Use of the RPA framework explained 16% to 27% of the variance. Implications for breast cancer prevention campaigns are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949627397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949627397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949627397

VL - 40

SP - 287

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 2

ER -