Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease

Lana L. Jackson, Christine Gourin, Daniel S. Thomas, Edward S. Porubsky, Frederick N. Klippert, David J. Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid disease has been shown to reduce surgical time as well as intraoperative blood loss. We sought to determine whether similar results could be achieved with the expanded use of the harmonic scalpel in parotidectomy for both benign and malignant disease. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: The medical records of all patients undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed. Patients were excluded for a history of bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, or concurrent neck dissection at the time of parotidectomy. Results: Forty-four patients underwent harmonic scalpel parotidectomy and 41 patients underwent conventional cold knife parotidectomy (control group). Use of the harmonic scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 3.6 mL vs. 66.0 ± 10.8 mL for controls, P <0.05) and duration of drainage (31.80 ± 2.4 h vs. 39.29 ± 2.21 h for controls, P <0.05). Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy (n = 35) compared to controls (n = 37) was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 4.23 mL vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 mL, P <0.05) and reduced incidence of facial nerve injury (P <0.05). In patients undergoing total parotidectomy, no significant differences were observed between the harmonic scalpel (n = 9) and control groups (n = 4) in length of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, duration of drainage, and facial nerve injury. Conclusions: Use of the harmonic scalpel in the surgical treatment of parotid disease is safe and confers some advantages over conventional methods of parotid dissection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1070-1073
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume115
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parotid Diseases
Facial Nerve Injuries
Drainage
Facial Nerve Diseases
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Control Groups
Neck Dissection
Operative Time
Medical Records
Dissection
Retrospective Studies
Hemorrhage
Incidence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Blood loss
  • Complications
  • Facial nerve
  • Harmonic scalpel
  • Parotidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease. / Jackson, Lana L.; Gourin, Christine; Thomas, Daniel S.; Porubsky, Edward S.; Klippert, Frederick N.; Terris, David J.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 115, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 1070-1073.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, Lana L. ; Gourin, Christine ; Thomas, Daniel S. ; Porubsky, Edward S. ; Klippert, Frederick N. ; Terris, David J. / Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease. In: Laryngoscope. 2005 ; Vol. 115, No. 6. pp. 1070-1073.
@article{98a99ec343c74590a59333747dd531ab,
title = "Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease",
abstract = "Objectives: Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid disease has been shown to reduce surgical time as well as intraoperative blood loss. We sought to determine whether similar results could be achieved with the expanded use of the harmonic scalpel in parotidectomy for both benign and malignant disease. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: The medical records of all patients undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed. Patients were excluded for a history of bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, or concurrent neck dissection at the time of parotidectomy. Results: Forty-four patients underwent harmonic scalpel parotidectomy and 41 patients underwent conventional cold knife parotidectomy (control group). Use of the harmonic scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 3.6 mL vs. 66.0 ± 10.8 mL for controls, P <0.05) and duration of drainage (31.80 ± 2.4 h vs. 39.29 ± 2.21 h for controls, P <0.05). Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy (n = 35) compared to controls (n = 37) was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 4.23 mL vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 mL, P <0.05) and reduced incidence of facial nerve injury (P <0.05). In patients undergoing total parotidectomy, no significant differences were observed between the harmonic scalpel (n = 9) and control groups (n = 4) in length of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, duration of drainage, and facial nerve injury. Conclusions: Use of the harmonic scalpel in the surgical treatment of parotid disease is safe and confers some advantages over conventional methods of parotid dissection.",
keywords = "Blood loss, Complications, Facial nerve, Harmonic scalpel, Parotidectomy",
author = "Jackson, {Lana L.} and Christine Gourin and Thomas, {Daniel S.} and Porubsky, {Edward S.} and Klippert, {Frederick N.} and Terris, {David J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/01.MLG.0000163336.37077.8F",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "1070--1073",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease

AU - Jackson, Lana L.

AU - Gourin, Christine

AU - Thomas, Daniel S.

AU - Porubsky, Edward S.

AU - Klippert, Frederick N.

AU - Terris, David J.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Objectives: Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid disease has been shown to reduce surgical time as well as intraoperative blood loss. We sought to determine whether similar results could be achieved with the expanded use of the harmonic scalpel in parotidectomy for both benign and malignant disease. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: The medical records of all patients undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed. Patients were excluded for a history of bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, or concurrent neck dissection at the time of parotidectomy. Results: Forty-four patients underwent harmonic scalpel parotidectomy and 41 patients underwent conventional cold knife parotidectomy (control group). Use of the harmonic scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 3.6 mL vs. 66.0 ± 10.8 mL for controls, P <0.05) and duration of drainage (31.80 ± 2.4 h vs. 39.29 ± 2.21 h for controls, P <0.05). Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy (n = 35) compared to controls (n = 37) was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 4.23 mL vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 mL, P <0.05) and reduced incidence of facial nerve injury (P <0.05). In patients undergoing total parotidectomy, no significant differences were observed between the harmonic scalpel (n = 9) and control groups (n = 4) in length of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, duration of drainage, and facial nerve injury. Conclusions: Use of the harmonic scalpel in the surgical treatment of parotid disease is safe and confers some advantages over conventional methods of parotid dissection.

AB - Objectives: Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid disease has been shown to reduce surgical time as well as intraoperative blood loss. We sought to determine whether similar results could be achieved with the expanded use of the harmonic scalpel in parotidectomy for both benign and malignant disease. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: The medical records of all patients undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed. Patients were excluded for a history of bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, or concurrent neck dissection at the time of parotidectomy. Results: Forty-four patients underwent harmonic scalpel parotidectomy and 41 patients underwent conventional cold knife parotidectomy (control group). Use of the harmonic scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 3.6 mL vs. 66.0 ± 10.8 mL for controls, P <0.05) and duration of drainage (31.80 ± 2.4 h vs. 39.29 ± 2.21 h for controls, P <0.05). Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial parotidectomy (n = 35) compared to controls (n = 37) was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (38.0 ± 4.23 mL vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 mL, P <0.05) and reduced incidence of facial nerve injury (P <0.05). In patients undergoing total parotidectomy, no significant differences were observed between the harmonic scalpel (n = 9) and control groups (n = 4) in length of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, duration of drainage, and facial nerve injury. Conclusions: Use of the harmonic scalpel in the surgical treatment of parotid disease is safe and confers some advantages over conventional methods of parotid dissection.

KW - Blood loss

KW - Complications

KW - Facial nerve

KW - Harmonic scalpel

KW - Parotidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20144380084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20144380084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163336.37077.8F

DO - 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163336.37077.8F

M3 - Article

C2 - 15933523

AN - SCOPUS:20144380084

VL - 115

SP - 1070

EP - 1073

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 6

ER -