Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination

Heidi Worth-Dickstein, Louis N. Pangaro, Mary K. MacMillan, Daniel J. Klass, John H. Shatzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Clinical skills examinations using standardized patients (SPs) are important in documenting the proficiency of trainees. "Standardized examinees" (SEs) are individuals trained to a specific level of performance; they can be used as internal controls in a high-stakes, clinical skills examination. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEs can be trained to portray a specified level of confidence and whether SPs' checklist scoring is affected by the personal manner of the examinee. Methods: Eight SEs were trained as "students" and trained to achieve a failing score on six cases in an National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Prototype Clinical Skills Examination. Four SEs were coached to be confident in manner, and 4 were coached to be insecure. Checklist scores were compared. Seven lay reviewers scored the SEs as confident or insecure on a behavioral assessment form. Results: SEs were not detected as simulations. There was no difference between the checklist scores of confident versus insecure SEs, but their manner was rated as significantly different on all scales in the behavioral assessment. Conclusions: SEs can be trained to a specified performance level and a desired level of confidence. In this small study, personal manner did not affect SPs' checklist scoring. The use of the SEs provides a mechanism to screen for bias in high-stakes SP examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-13
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Checklist
examination
trend
confidence
Coroners and Medical Examiners
medical examiner
trainee
performance
Students
simulation
student
Mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Worth-Dickstein, H., Pangaro, L. N., MacMillan, M. K., Klass, D. J., & Shatzer, J. H. (2005). Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(1), 9-13.

Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination. / Worth-Dickstein, Heidi; Pangaro, Louis N.; MacMillan, Mary K.; Klass, Daniel J.; Shatzer, John H.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 1, 12.2005, p. 9-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Worth-Dickstein, H, Pangaro, LN, MacMillan, MK, Klass, DJ & Shatzer, JH 2005, 'Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination', Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9-13.
Worth-Dickstein, Heidi ; Pangaro, Louis N. ; MacMillan, Mary K. ; Klass, Daniel J. ; Shatzer, John H. / Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination. In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 9-13.
@article{98b677a120c8479bb2a346bb760de804,
title = "Use of {"}standardized examinees{"} to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination",
abstract = "Background: Clinical skills examinations using standardized patients (SPs) are important in documenting the proficiency of trainees. {"}Standardized examinees{"} (SEs) are individuals trained to a specific level of performance; they can be used as internal controls in a high-stakes, clinical skills examination. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEs can be trained to portray a specified level of confidence and whether SPs' checklist scoring is affected by the personal manner of the examinee. Methods: Eight SEs were trained as {"}students{"} and trained to achieve a failing score on six cases in an National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Prototype Clinical Skills Examination. Four SEs were coached to be confident in manner, and 4 were coached to be insecure. Checklist scores were compared. Seven lay reviewers scored the SEs as confident or insecure on a behavioral assessment form. Results: SEs were not detected as simulations. There was no difference between the checklist scores of confident versus insecure SEs, but their manner was rated as significantly different on all scales in the behavioral assessment. Conclusions: SEs can be trained to a specified performance level and a desired level of confidence. In this small study, personal manner did not affect SPs' checklist scoring. The use of the SEs provides a mechanism to screen for bias in high-stakes SP examinations.",
author = "Heidi Worth-Dickstein and Pangaro, {Louis N.} and MacMillan, {Mary K.} and Klass, {Daniel J.} and Shatzer, {John H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination

AU - Worth-Dickstein, Heidi

AU - Pangaro, Louis N.

AU - MacMillan, Mary K.

AU - Klass, Daniel J.

AU - Shatzer, John H.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Background: Clinical skills examinations using standardized patients (SPs) are important in documenting the proficiency of trainees. "Standardized examinees" (SEs) are individuals trained to a specific level of performance; they can be used as internal controls in a high-stakes, clinical skills examination. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEs can be trained to portray a specified level of confidence and whether SPs' checklist scoring is affected by the personal manner of the examinee. Methods: Eight SEs were trained as "students" and trained to achieve a failing score on six cases in an National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Prototype Clinical Skills Examination. Four SEs were coached to be confident in manner, and 4 were coached to be insecure. Checklist scores were compared. Seven lay reviewers scored the SEs as confident or insecure on a behavioral assessment form. Results: SEs were not detected as simulations. There was no difference between the checklist scores of confident versus insecure SEs, but their manner was rated as significantly different on all scales in the behavioral assessment. Conclusions: SEs can be trained to a specified performance level and a desired level of confidence. In this small study, personal manner did not affect SPs' checklist scoring. The use of the SEs provides a mechanism to screen for bias in high-stakes SP examinations.

AB - Background: Clinical skills examinations using standardized patients (SPs) are important in documenting the proficiency of trainees. "Standardized examinees" (SEs) are individuals trained to a specific level of performance; they can be used as internal controls in a high-stakes, clinical skills examination. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEs can be trained to portray a specified level of confidence and whether SPs' checklist scoring is affected by the personal manner of the examinee. Methods: Eight SEs were trained as "students" and trained to achieve a failing score on six cases in an National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Prototype Clinical Skills Examination. Four SEs were coached to be confident in manner, and 4 were coached to be insecure. Checklist scores were compared. Seven lay reviewers scored the SEs as confident or insecure on a behavioral assessment form. Results: SEs were not detected as simulations. There was no difference between the checklist scores of confident versus insecure SEs, but their manner was rated as significantly different on all scales in the behavioral assessment. Conclusions: SEs can be trained to a specified performance level and a desired level of confidence. In this small study, personal manner did not affect SPs' checklist scoring. The use of the SEs provides a mechanism to screen for bias in high-stakes SP examinations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944351040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944351040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15691808

AN - SCOPUS:14944351040

VL - 17

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 1

ER -