Use of propensity score methods to address adverse events associated with the storage time of blood in an obstetric population: A comparison of methods

Jillian A. Patterson, Elizabeth Stuart, Jane B. Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: A recent topic of interest in the blood transfusion literature is the existence of adverse effects of transfusing red cells towards the end of their storage life. This interest has been sparked by conflicting results in observational studies, however a number of methodological difficulties with these studies have been noted. One potential strategy to address these difficulties is the use of propensity scores, of which there are a number of possible methods. This study aims to compare the traditional methods for binary exposures with more recently developed generalised propensity score methods. Methods: Data were obtained from probabilistically linked hospital, births and blood bank databases for all women giving birth from 23 weeks gestation in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010 with complete information on the birth admission and blood issued. Analysis was restricted to women who received 1-4 units of red cells. Three different propensity score methods (for binary, ordinal and continuous exposures) were compared, using each of four different approaches to estimating the effect (matching, stratifying, weighting and adjusting by the propensity score). Each method was used to determine the effect of blood storage time on rates of severe morbidity and readmission or transfer. Results: Data were available for 2990 deliveries to women receiving 1-4 units of red cells. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.7 %, and of readmission or transfer was 14.4 %. There was no association between blood storage time and rates of severe morbidity or readmission irrespective of the approach used. There was no single optimal propensity score method; the approaches differed in their ease of implementation and interpretation. Conclusions: Within an obstetric population, there was no evidence of an increase in adverse events following transfusion of older blood. Propensity score methods provide a useful tool for addressing the question of adverse events with increasing storage time of blood, as these methods avoid many of the pitfalls of previous studies. In particular, generalised propensity scores can be used in situations where the exposure is not binary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number367
JournalBMC Research Notes
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 26 2016

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Propensity Score
Blood
Population
Cells
Parturition
Morbidity
Blood Transfusion
Blood Banks
South Australia
New South Wales
Observational Studies
Mothers
Databases

Keywords

  • Blood transfusion
  • Observational study
  • Obstetrics
  • Propensity score methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Use of propensity score methods to address adverse events associated with the storage time of blood in an obstetric population : A comparison of methods. / Patterson, Jillian A.; Stuart, Elizabeth; Ford, Jane B.

In: BMC Research Notes, Vol. 9, No. 1, 367, 26.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14e74e1fca9e49c0a286d00ea8f5f0d4,
title = "Use of propensity score methods to address adverse events associated with the storage time of blood in an obstetric population: A comparison of methods",
abstract = "Background: A recent topic of interest in the blood transfusion literature is the existence of adverse effects of transfusing red cells towards the end of their storage life. This interest has been sparked by conflicting results in observational studies, however a number of methodological difficulties with these studies have been noted. One potential strategy to address these difficulties is the use of propensity scores, of which there are a number of possible methods. This study aims to compare the traditional methods for binary exposures with more recently developed generalised propensity score methods. Methods: Data were obtained from probabilistically linked hospital, births and blood bank databases for all women giving birth from 23 weeks gestation in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010 with complete information on the birth admission and blood issued. Analysis was restricted to women who received 1-4 units of red cells. Three different propensity score methods (for binary, ordinal and continuous exposures) were compared, using each of four different approaches to estimating the effect (matching, stratifying, weighting and adjusting by the propensity score). Each method was used to determine the effect of blood storage time on rates of severe morbidity and readmission or transfer. Results: Data were available for 2990 deliveries to women receiving 1-4 units of red cells. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.7 {\%}, and of readmission or transfer was 14.4 {\%}. There was no association between blood storage time and rates of severe morbidity or readmission irrespective of the approach used. There was no single optimal propensity score method; the approaches differed in their ease of implementation and interpretation. Conclusions: Within an obstetric population, there was no evidence of an increase in adverse events following transfusion of older blood. Propensity score methods provide a useful tool for addressing the question of adverse events with increasing storage time of blood, as these methods avoid many of the pitfalls of previous studies. In particular, generalised propensity scores can be used in situations where the exposure is not binary.",
keywords = "Blood transfusion, Observational study, Obstetrics, Propensity score methods",
author = "Patterson, {Jillian A.} and Elizabeth Stuart and Ford, {Jane B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s13104-016-2169-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMC Research Notes",
issn = "1756-0500",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of propensity score methods to address adverse events associated with the storage time of blood in an obstetric population

T2 - A comparison of methods

AU - Patterson, Jillian A.

AU - Stuart, Elizabeth

AU - Ford, Jane B.

PY - 2016/7/26

Y1 - 2016/7/26

N2 - Background: A recent topic of interest in the blood transfusion literature is the existence of adverse effects of transfusing red cells towards the end of their storage life. This interest has been sparked by conflicting results in observational studies, however a number of methodological difficulties with these studies have been noted. One potential strategy to address these difficulties is the use of propensity scores, of which there are a number of possible methods. This study aims to compare the traditional methods for binary exposures with more recently developed generalised propensity score methods. Methods: Data were obtained from probabilistically linked hospital, births and blood bank databases for all women giving birth from 23 weeks gestation in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010 with complete information on the birth admission and blood issued. Analysis was restricted to women who received 1-4 units of red cells. Three different propensity score methods (for binary, ordinal and continuous exposures) were compared, using each of four different approaches to estimating the effect (matching, stratifying, weighting and adjusting by the propensity score). Each method was used to determine the effect of blood storage time on rates of severe morbidity and readmission or transfer. Results: Data were available for 2990 deliveries to women receiving 1-4 units of red cells. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.7 %, and of readmission or transfer was 14.4 %. There was no association between blood storage time and rates of severe morbidity or readmission irrespective of the approach used. There was no single optimal propensity score method; the approaches differed in their ease of implementation and interpretation. Conclusions: Within an obstetric population, there was no evidence of an increase in adverse events following transfusion of older blood. Propensity score methods provide a useful tool for addressing the question of adverse events with increasing storage time of blood, as these methods avoid many of the pitfalls of previous studies. In particular, generalised propensity scores can be used in situations where the exposure is not binary.

AB - Background: A recent topic of interest in the blood transfusion literature is the existence of adverse effects of transfusing red cells towards the end of their storage life. This interest has been sparked by conflicting results in observational studies, however a number of methodological difficulties with these studies have been noted. One potential strategy to address these difficulties is the use of propensity scores, of which there are a number of possible methods. This study aims to compare the traditional methods for binary exposures with more recently developed generalised propensity score methods. Methods: Data were obtained from probabilistically linked hospital, births and blood bank databases for all women giving birth from 23 weeks gestation in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010 with complete information on the birth admission and blood issued. Analysis was restricted to women who received 1-4 units of red cells. Three different propensity score methods (for binary, ordinal and continuous exposures) were compared, using each of four different approaches to estimating the effect (matching, stratifying, weighting and adjusting by the propensity score). Each method was used to determine the effect of blood storage time on rates of severe morbidity and readmission or transfer. Results: Data were available for 2990 deliveries to women receiving 1-4 units of red cells. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.7 %, and of readmission or transfer was 14.4 %. There was no association between blood storage time and rates of severe morbidity or readmission irrespective of the approach used. There was no single optimal propensity score method; the approaches differed in their ease of implementation and interpretation. Conclusions: Within an obstetric population, there was no evidence of an increase in adverse events following transfusion of older blood. Propensity score methods provide a useful tool for addressing the question of adverse events with increasing storage time of blood, as these methods avoid many of the pitfalls of previous studies. In particular, generalised propensity scores can be used in situations where the exposure is not binary.

KW - Blood transfusion

KW - Observational study

KW - Obstetrics

KW - Propensity score methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984941705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984941705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13104-016-2169-1

DO - 10.1186/s13104-016-2169-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 27461118

AN - SCOPUS:84984941705

VL - 9

JO - BMC Research Notes

JF - BMC Research Notes

SN - 1756-0500

IS - 1

M1 - 367

ER -