Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology

Samuel Smith, S. Hosid, L. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate strict sperm morphology after preparation of semen specimens using three different sperm separation techniques, since strict morphology correlates well with IVF. Design: Semen from 30 men were analyzed before and after sperm separation using mini-Percoll gradient, direct swim- up, and SpermPrep filtration column (ZBL, Inc., Lexington, KY) methods. Setting: Assisted Reproductive Technology laboratory at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. Main Outcome Measures: Primary end points measured were percent morphologically normal sperm and percent improvement in sperm morphology, using Kruger strict criteria. Secondary factors determined were percent motility, improvement in motility, hypoosmotic swelling, improvement in hypoosmotic swelling, and 24- and 48-hour sperm survival under simulated IVF conditions. Results: Mini-Percoll produced specimens with significantly greater normal sperm morphology, morphology improvement, motility, hypoosmotic swelling, and survival than obtained with the other two separation methods. For 25 of 30 specimens, mini-Percoll yielded the greatest number of morphologically normal, motile sperm that survived for 24 hours. In four instances, mini-Percoll was associated with an increased percentage of acrosomal abnormalities despite an overall improvement in morphology. Hypoosmotic swelling scores were lower in two subjects after mini-Percoll sperm separation and in three subjects for each of the other methods. Conclusions: Data suggest that mini-Percoll is superior to swim-up or SpermPrep for producing specimens with enhanced morphology, motility, and in vitro survival. However, no single separation technique is always superior, and methodology may induce damage to the acrosome or sperm membranes. Sperm specimens should be evaluated individually to determine the best separation method before actual ART cycles. The technique that yields the most morphologically normal, motile sperm that survive in culture should be used for ART procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-597
Number of pages7
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Spermatozoa
Semen
Acrosome
Baltimore
Survival
Percoll

Keywords

  • Percoll gradient
  • Sperm separation
  • strict morphology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology. / Smith, Samuel; Hosid, S.; Scott, L.

In: Fertility and sterility, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 591-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2cf474a123e54fbe8052a88c8afbe8c7,
title = "Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate strict sperm morphology after preparation of semen specimens using three different sperm separation techniques, since strict morphology correlates well with IVF. Design: Semen from 30 men were analyzed before and after sperm separation using mini-Percoll gradient, direct swim- up, and SpermPrep filtration column (ZBL, Inc., Lexington, KY) methods. Setting: Assisted Reproductive Technology laboratory at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. Main Outcome Measures: Primary end points measured were percent morphologically normal sperm and percent improvement in sperm morphology, using Kruger strict criteria. Secondary factors determined were percent motility, improvement in motility, hypoosmotic swelling, improvement in hypoosmotic swelling, and 24- and 48-hour sperm survival under simulated IVF conditions. Results: Mini-Percoll produced specimens with significantly greater normal sperm morphology, morphology improvement, motility, hypoosmotic swelling, and survival than obtained with the other two separation methods. For 25 of 30 specimens, mini-Percoll yielded the greatest number of morphologically normal, motile sperm that survived for 24 hours. In four instances, mini-Percoll was associated with an increased percentage of acrosomal abnormalities despite an overall improvement in morphology. Hypoosmotic swelling scores were lower in two subjects after mini-Percoll sperm separation and in three subjects for each of the other methods. Conclusions: Data suggest that mini-Percoll is superior to swim-up or SpermPrep for producing specimens with enhanced morphology, motility, and in vitro survival. However, no single separation technique is always superior, and methodology may induce damage to the acrosome or sperm membranes. Sperm specimens should be evaluated individually to determine the best separation method before actual ART cycles. The technique that yields the most morphologically normal, motile sperm that survive in culture should be used for ART procedures.",
keywords = "Percoll gradient, Sperm separation, strict morphology",
author = "Samuel Smith and S. Hosid and L. Scott",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57431-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "591--597",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology

AU - Smith, Samuel

AU - Hosid, S.

AU - Scott, L.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate strict sperm morphology after preparation of semen specimens using three different sperm separation techniques, since strict morphology correlates well with IVF. Design: Semen from 30 men were analyzed before and after sperm separation using mini-Percoll gradient, direct swim- up, and SpermPrep filtration column (ZBL, Inc., Lexington, KY) methods. Setting: Assisted Reproductive Technology laboratory at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. Main Outcome Measures: Primary end points measured were percent morphologically normal sperm and percent improvement in sperm morphology, using Kruger strict criteria. Secondary factors determined were percent motility, improvement in motility, hypoosmotic swelling, improvement in hypoosmotic swelling, and 24- and 48-hour sperm survival under simulated IVF conditions. Results: Mini-Percoll produced specimens with significantly greater normal sperm morphology, morphology improvement, motility, hypoosmotic swelling, and survival than obtained with the other two separation methods. For 25 of 30 specimens, mini-Percoll yielded the greatest number of morphologically normal, motile sperm that survived for 24 hours. In four instances, mini-Percoll was associated with an increased percentage of acrosomal abnormalities despite an overall improvement in morphology. Hypoosmotic swelling scores were lower in two subjects after mini-Percoll sperm separation and in three subjects for each of the other methods. Conclusions: Data suggest that mini-Percoll is superior to swim-up or SpermPrep for producing specimens with enhanced morphology, motility, and in vitro survival. However, no single separation technique is always superior, and methodology may induce damage to the acrosome or sperm membranes. Sperm specimens should be evaluated individually to determine the best separation method before actual ART cycles. The technique that yields the most morphologically normal, motile sperm that survive in culture should be used for ART procedures.

AB - Objective: To evaluate strict sperm morphology after preparation of semen specimens using three different sperm separation techniques, since strict morphology correlates well with IVF. Design: Semen from 30 men were analyzed before and after sperm separation using mini-Percoll gradient, direct swim- up, and SpermPrep filtration column (ZBL, Inc., Lexington, KY) methods. Setting: Assisted Reproductive Technology laboratory at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. Main Outcome Measures: Primary end points measured were percent morphologically normal sperm and percent improvement in sperm morphology, using Kruger strict criteria. Secondary factors determined were percent motility, improvement in motility, hypoosmotic swelling, improvement in hypoosmotic swelling, and 24- and 48-hour sperm survival under simulated IVF conditions. Results: Mini-Percoll produced specimens with significantly greater normal sperm morphology, morphology improvement, motility, hypoosmotic swelling, and survival than obtained with the other two separation methods. For 25 of 30 specimens, mini-Percoll yielded the greatest number of morphologically normal, motile sperm that survived for 24 hours. In four instances, mini-Percoll was associated with an increased percentage of acrosomal abnormalities despite an overall improvement in morphology. Hypoosmotic swelling scores were lower in two subjects after mini-Percoll sperm separation and in three subjects for each of the other methods. Conclusions: Data suggest that mini-Percoll is superior to swim-up or SpermPrep for producing specimens with enhanced morphology, motility, and in vitro survival. However, no single separation technique is always superior, and methodology may induce damage to the acrosome or sperm membranes. Sperm specimens should be evaluated individually to determine the best separation method before actual ART cycles. The technique that yields the most morphologically normal, motile sperm that survive in culture should be used for ART procedures.

KW - Percoll gradient

KW - Sperm separation

KW - strict morphology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028959154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028959154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57431-7

DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57431-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 7851592

AN - SCOPUS:0028959154

VL - 63

SP - 591

EP - 597

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 3

ER -