Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction: A review of 106 patients

Daniel C. Garibaldi, Nicholas T. Iliff, Michael Grant, Shannath L Merbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our initial experience with a porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts was performed for patients receiving at least 1 orbital porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium from October 2004 through April 2006. Patient demographics, implant type and size, method of fixation, postoperative complications, and length of follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred six patients received at least one embedded titanium implant (80 men, 26 women). Age ranged from 3 years to 85 years (mean, 31 years). Indications included orbital fracture repair (102 patients), correction of enophthalmos (3 patients), and reconstruction after tumor resection (1 patient). The average floor implant used was 22.3 mm wide by 27.9 mm long. The average medial wall implant was 13.6 mm tall by 22 mm long. Implants were fixated with 1 or 2 microscrews in 75 patients (70.8%) and placed without fixation in 31 patients (29.2%). Four postoperative complications were noted: a retrobulbar hemorrhage on postoperative day 3 that resolved without sequelae, a vertical overcorrection requiring removal of the implant, a transient oculomotor disturbance, and a screw placed in proximity to the infraorbital nerve canal resulting in hypesthesia and chronic pain that required removal of the screw. In the 3 complications potentially related to the implant, the embedded titanium allowed postoperative implant visualization and guided subsequent management. No implant extrusions or postoperative infections were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Porous polyethylene implants with embedded titanium provide a new alternative to alloplastic implant materials for orbital reconstruction with a profile that combines several advantages of porous polyethylene and titanium implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-444
Number of pages6
JournalOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Polyethylene
Titanium
Retrobulbar Hemorrhage
Orbital Implants
Enophthalmos
Orbital Fractures
Hypesthesia
Chronic Pain
Demography
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction : A review of 106 patients. / Garibaldi, Daniel C.; Iliff, Nicholas T.; Grant, Michael; Merbs, Shannath L.

In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 439-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da4d81f1071d4226a74ffcbd35c8aed5,
title = "Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction: A review of 106 patients",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate our initial experience with a porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts was performed for patients receiving at least 1 orbital porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium from October 2004 through April 2006. Patient demographics, implant type and size, method of fixation, postoperative complications, and length of follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred six patients received at least one embedded titanium implant (80 men, 26 women). Age ranged from 3 years to 85 years (mean, 31 years). Indications included orbital fracture repair (102 patients), correction of enophthalmos (3 patients), and reconstruction after tumor resection (1 patient). The average floor implant used was 22.3 mm wide by 27.9 mm long. The average medial wall implant was 13.6 mm tall by 22 mm long. Implants were fixated with 1 or 2 microscrews in 75 patients (70.8{\%}) and placed without fixation in 31 patients (29.2{\%}). Four postoperative complications were noted: a retrobulbar hemorrhage on postoperative day 3 that resolved without sequelae, a vertical overcorrection requiring removal of the implant, a transient oculomotor disturbance, and a screw placed in proximity to the infraorbital nerve canal resulting in hypesthesia and chronic pain that required removal of the screw. In the 3 complications potentially related to the implant, the embedded titanium allowed postoperative implant visualization and guided subsequent management. No implant extrusions or postoperative infections were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Porous polyethylene implants with embedded titanium provide a new alternative to alloplastic implant materials for orbital reconstruction with a profile that combines several advantages of porous polyethylene and titanium implants.",
author = "Garibaldi, {Daniel C.} and Iliff, {Nicholas T.} and Michael Grant and Merbs, {Shannath L}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/IOP.0b013e31815a1235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "439--444",
journal = "Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0740-9303",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction

T2 - A review of 106 patients

AU - Garibaldi, Daniel C.

AU - Iliff, Nicholas T.

AU - Grant, Michael

AU - Merbs, Shannath L

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate our initial experience with a porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts was performed for patients receiving at least 1 orbital porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium from October 2004 through April 2006. Patient demographics, implant type and size, method of fixation, postoperative complications, and length of follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred six patients received at least one embedded titanium implant (80 men, 26 women). Age ranged from 3 years to 85 years (mean, 31 years). Indications included orbital fracture repair (102 patients), correction of enophthalmos (3 patients), and reconstruction after tumor resection (1 patient). The average floor implant used was 22.3 mm wide by 27.9 mm long. The average medial wall implant was 13.6 mm tall by 22 mm long. Implants were fixated with 1 or 2 microscrews in 75 patients (70.8%) and placed without fixation in 31 patients (29.2%). Four postoperative complications were noted: a retrobulbar hemorrhage on postoperative day 3 that resolved without sequelae, a vertical overcorrection requiring removal of the implant, a transient oculomotor disturbance, and a screw placed in proximity to the infraorbital nerve canal resulting in hypesthesia and chronic pain that required removal of the screw. In the 3 complications potentially related to the implant, the embedded titanium allowed postoperative implant visualization and guided subsequent management. No implant extrusions or postoperative infections were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Porous polyethylene implants with embedded titanium provide a new alternative to alloplastic implant materials for orbital reconstruction with a profile that combines several advantages of porous polyethylene and titanium implants.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate our initial experience with a porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts was performed for patients receiving at least 1 orbital porous polyethylene implant with embedded titanium from October 2004 through April 2006. Patient demographics, implant type and size, method of fixation, postoperative complications, and length of follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred six patients received at least one embedded titanium implant (80 men, 26 women). Age ranged from 3 years to 85 years (mean, 31 years). Indications included orbital fracture repair (102 patients), correction of enophthalmos (3 patients), and reconstruction after tumor resection (1 patient). The average floor implant used was 22.3 mm wide by 27.9 mm long. The average medial wall implant was 13.6 mm tall by 22 mm long. Implants were fixated with 1 or 2 microscrews in 75 patients (70.8%) and placed without fixation in 31 patients (29.2%). Four postoperative complications were noted: a retrobulbar hemorrhage on postoperative day 3 that resolved without sequelae, a vertical overcorrection requiring removal of the implant, a transient oculomotor disturbance, and a screw placed in proximity to the infraorbital nerve canal resulting in hypesthesia and chronic pain that required removal of the screw. In the 3 complications potentially related to the implant, the embedded titanium allowed postoperative implant visualization and guided subsequent management. No implant extrusions or postoperative infections were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Porous polyethylene implants with embedded titanium provide a new alternative to alloplastic implant materials for orbital reconstruction with a profile that combines several advantages of porous polyethylene and titanium implants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348929356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348929356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31815a1235

DO - 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31815a1235

M3 - Article

C2 - 18030113

AN - SCOPUS:36348929356

VL - 23

SP - 439

EP - 444

JO - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0740-9303

IS - 6

ER -