Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status

Norma F Kanarek, Ron Bialek, Jennifer Stanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. Methods To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. Results Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14-58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. Discussion Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPreventing chronic disease
Volume5
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Health Status
Public Health
Health Status Indicators
Health
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status. / Kanarek, Norma F; Bialek, Ron; Stanley, Jennifer.

In: Preventing chronic disease, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c049d3d763b14ed99421e9ee3d0084db,
title = "Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status",
abstract = "Introduction The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. Methods To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. Results Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14-58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. Discussion Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.",
author = "Kanarek, {Norma F} and Ron Bialek and Jennifer Stanley",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Preventing chronic disease",
issn = "1545-1151",
publisher = "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status

AU - Kanarek, Norma F

AU - Bialek, Ron

AU - Stanley, Jennifer

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Introduction The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. Methods To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. Results Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14-58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. Discussion Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.

AB - Introduction The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities. Methods To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings. Results Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14-58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states. Discussion Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978437259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978437259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Preventing chronic disease

JF - Preventing chronic disease

SN - 1545-1151

IS - 3

ER -