Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature

Alejandro D. Treszezamsky, Nazanin Ehsani, Roxanne Connell, Madeline Dick-Biascoechea, Tola Fashokun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims We aimed to describe the current use of patient reported outcome questionnaires (PROQ) in the urogynecologic literature. Methods All articles from 2009 in 11 journals were reviewed and included if PROQ were used. PROQ were assigned the grades of recommendation used by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). Data were collected by two independent reviewers (differences resolved by consensus). Fisher and χ2 tests were used for statistics. Results Of the 212 articles included, 126 used multiple PROQ. Seventy-two percent used at least one grade A PROQ and 42% exclusively used grade A PROQ. Articles about urinary incontinence (UI) were more likely to use grade A PROQ than those pertaining to interstitial cystitis or anal incontinence. Eighty-three articles used PROQ in non-English languages. These articles were as likely to use ICI grade A PROQ as those using English PROQ. When translated questionnaires are used, 41.5% of articles did not provide references for a validation of the translated version. Eighty-seven different PROQ were identified and used 422 times. Of those, 75 were developed in English. Short versions were used more frequently. PROQ available online were used 9.4 times more frequently than those requiring payment. The more utilized PROQ were more often grade A than those rarely used (P <0.001). Conclusions Using multiple PROQ is common in the literature reviewed. 72.2% of articles used at least one PROQ with the highest ICI recommendation but only 42% used exclusively those. Short and easily available PROQ were used more often. Most PROQ are developed in English.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-340
Number of pages5
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Interstitial Cystitis
Urinary Incontinence
Consensus
Language
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • patient-reported outcomes
  • subjective outcomes
  • urogynecology literature
  • validated questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Urology

Cite this

Treszezamsky, A. D., Ehsani, N., Connell, R., Dick-Biascoechea, M., & Fashokun, T. (2013). Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 32(4), 336-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22312

Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature. / Treszezamsky, Alejandro D.; Ehsani, Nazanin; Connell, Roxanne; Dick-Biascoechea, Madeline; Fashokun, Tola.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 336-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Treszezamsky, AD, Ehsani, N, Connell, R, Dick-Biascoechea, M & Fashokun, T 2013, 'Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature', Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 336-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22312
Treszezamsky AD, Ehsani N, Connell R, Dick-Biascoechea M, Fashokun T. Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2013 Apr;32(4):336-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22312
Treszezamsky, Alejandro D. ; Ehsani, Nazanin ; Connell, Roxanne ; Dick-Biascoechea, Madeline ; Fashokun, Tola. / Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature. In: Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2013 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 336-340.
@article{3ef93d51f09448468565908756063e0b,
title = "Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature",
abstract = "Aims We aimed to describe the current use of patient reported outcome questionnaires (PROQ) in the urogynecologic literature. Methods All articles from 2009 in 11 journals were reviewed and included if PROQ were used. PROQ were assigned the grades of recommendation used by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). Data were collected by two independent reviewers (differences resolved by consensus). Fisher and χ2 tests were used for statistics. Results Of the 212 articles included, 126 used multiple PROQ. Seventy-two percent used at least one grade A PROQ and 42{\%} exclusively used grade A PROQ. Articles about urinary incontinence (UI) were more likely to use grade A PROQ than those pertaining to interstitial cystitis or anal incontinence. Eighty-three articles used PROQ in non-English languages. These articles were as likely to use ICI grade A PROQ as those using English PROQ. When translated questionnaires are used, 41.5{\%} of articles did not provide references for a validation of the translated version. Eighty-seven different PROQ were identified and used 422 times. Of those, 75 were developed in English. Short versions were used more frequently. PROQ available online were used 9.4 times more frequently than those requiring payment. The more utilized PROQ were more often grade A than those rarely used (P <0.001). Conclusions Using multiple PROQ is common in the literature reviewed. 72.2{\%} of articles used at least one PROQ with the highest ICI recommendation but only 42{\%} used exclusively those. Short and easily available PROQ were used more often. Most PROQ are developed in English.",
keywords = "patient-reported outcomes, subjective outcomes, urogynecology literature, validated questionnaires",
author = "Treszezamsky, {Alejandro D.} and Nazanin Ehsani and Roxanne Connell and Madeline Dick-Biascoechea and Tola Fashokun",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/nau.22312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "336--340",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in the urogynecologic literature

AU - Treszezamsky, Alejandro D.

AU - Ehsani, Nazanin

AU - Connell, Roxanne

AU - Dick-Biascoechea, Madeline

AU - Fashokun, Tola

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Aims We aimed to describe the current use of patient reported outcome questionnaires (PROQ) in the urogynecologic literature. Methods All articles from 2009 in 11 journals were reviewed and included if PROQ were used. PROQ were assigned the grades of recommendation used by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). Data were collected by two independent reviewers (differences resolved by consensus). Fisher and χ2 tests were used for statistics. Results Of the 212 articles included, 126 used multiple PROQ. Seventy-two percent used at least one grade A PROQ and 42% exclusively used grade A PROQ. Articles about urinary incontinence (UI) were more likely to use grade A PROQ than those pertaining to interstitial cystitis or anal incontinence. Eighty-three articles used PROQ in non-English languages. These articles were as likely to use ICI grade A PROQ as those using English PROQ. When translated questionnaires are used, 41.5% of articles did not provide references for a validation of the translated version. Eighty-seven different PROQ were identified and used 422 times. Of those, 75 were developed in English. Short versions were used more frequently. PROQ available online were used 9.4 times more frequently than those requiring payment. The more utilized PROQ were more often grade A than those rarely used (P <0.001). Conclusions Using multiple PROQ is common in the literature reviewed. 72.2% of articles used at least one PROQ with the highest ICI recommendation but only 42% used exclusively those. Short and easily available PROQ were used more often. Most PROQ are developed in English.

AB - Aims We aimed to describe the current use of patient reported outcome questionnaires (PROQ) in the urogynecologic literature. Methods All articles from 2009 in 11 journals were reviewed and included if PROQ were used. PROQ were assigned the grades of recommendation used by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). Data were collected by two independent reviewers (differences resolved by consensus). Fisher and χ2 tests were used for statistics. Results Of the 212 articles included, 126 used multiple PROQ. Seventy-two percent used at least one grade A PROQ and 42% exclusively used grade A PROQ. Articles about urinary incontinence (UI) were more likely to use grade A PROQ than those pertaining to interstitial cystitis or anal incontinence. Eighty-three articles used PROQ in non-English languages. These articles were as likely to use ICI grade A PROQ as those using English PROQ. When translated questionnaires are used, 41.5% of articles did not provide references for a validation of the translated version. Eighty-seven different PROQ were identified and used 422 times. Of those, 75 were developed in English. Short versions were used more frequently. PROQ available online were used 9.4 times more frequently than those requiring payment. The more utilized PROQ were more often grade A than those rarely used (P <0.001). Conclusions Using multiple PROQ is common in the literature reviewed. 72.2% of articles used at least one PROQ with the highest ICI recommendation but only 42% used exclusively those. Short and easily available PROQ were used more often. Most PROQ are developed in English.

KW - patient-reported outcomes

KW - subjective outcomes

KW - urogynecology literature

KW - validated questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876417329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876417329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.22312

DO - 10.1002/nau.22312

M3 - Article

C2 - 23002074

AN - SCOPUS:84876417329

VL - 32

SP - 336

EP - 340

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 4

ER -