Use of field-portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analyzer to measure airborne lead levels in Korean workplaces

Nam Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyu Dong Ahn, Byung Kook Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We evaluated the possibility of applying field-portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analysis as a rapid, on-site and near real-time method for evaluating airborne lead contamination in Korean workplaces. A total of 287 airborne lead filter samples were measured in 12 lead-using workplaces during routine industrial hygienic monitoring procedures as required by Korean government regulations. All filter samples were collected using the standard industrial hygiene sampling protocol described in NIOSH Method 7300 using closed-face 37-mm cassettes with preloaded cellulose ester membrane filters with a pore size of 0.8 μm. The samples were first analyzed using the nondestructive, FPXRF analytical method (NIOSH method 7702), and then subsequently analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP) (NIOSH method 7300) as a reference analytical method. Pair-wise comparison of filter samples using the paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between the two methods over a wide range of airborne lead levels (0.018-0.201 μg/m3) either over the industries assessed or separately in the 12 lead-using workplaces. Linear regression of the data between the ICP and FPXRF methods produced a slope of 1.03, a y-intercept of 0.13 μg/sample, and a coefficient of determinant (r2) of 0.975 for all the data. For samples in the range from 0 to 100 ?g, the corresponding values were 1.07, -1.20 ?g/sample, and 0.925, respectively. There were no significant differences in the regression analyses of the three industry types (r2=0.964-0.982). Our data suggest that FPXRF data are highly correlated with those from the laboratory-based ICP method in terms of accuracy, precision, and bias. Therefore, FPXRF can be used for the rapid, on-site analysis of lead air-filter samples for values up to 26 μg/sample prior to laboratory confirmation by the ICP method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-498
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Occupational Health
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workplace
Fluorescence
X-Rays
X rays
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
Inductively coupled plasma
Industrial hygiene
Air filters
Spectrophotometry
Linear regression
Pore size
Industry
Lead
Air Filters
Contamination
Government Regulation
Atomic Spectrophotometry
Sampling
Occupational Health
Monitoring

Keywords

  • FPXRF (field-portable x-ray fluorescence)
  • ICP (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry)
  • Lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Use of field-portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analyzer to measure airborne lead levels in Korean workplaces. / Kim, Nam Soo; Kim, Jin Ho; Ahn, Kyu Dong; Lee, Byung Kook.

In: Journal of Occupational Health, Vol. 49, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 493-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Nam Soo ; Kim, Jin Ho ; Ahn, Kyu Dong ; Lee, Byung Kook. / Use of field-portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analyzer to measure airborne lead levels in Korean workplaces. In: Journal of Occupational Health. 2007 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 493-498.
@article{20353b54a7ab49fa8974a3df632fb651,
title = "Use of field-portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analyzer to measure airborne lead levels in Korean workplaces",
abstract = "We evaluated the possibility of applying field-portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analysis as a rapid, on-site and near real-time method for evaluating airborne lead contamination in Korean workplaces. A total of 287 airborne lead filter samples were measured in 12 lead-using workplaces during routine industrial hygienic monitoring procedures as required by Korean government regulations. All filter samples were collected using the standard industrial hygiene sampling protocol described in NIOSH Method 7300 using closed-face 37-mm cassettes with preloaded cellulose ester membrane filters with a pore size of 0.8 μm. The samples were first analyzed using the nondestructive, FPXRF analytical method (NIOSH method 7702), and then subsequently analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP) (NIOSH method 7300) as a reference analytical method. Pair-wise comparison of filter samples using the paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between the two methods over a wide range of airborne lead levels (0.018-0.201 μg/m3) either over the industries assessed or separately in the 12 lead-using workplaces. Linear regression of the data between the ICP and FPXRF methods produced a slope of 1.03, a y-intercept of 0.13 μg/sample, and a coefficient of determinant (r2) of 0.975 for all the data. For samples in the range from 0 to 100 ?g, the corresponding values were 1.07, -1.20 ?g/sample, and 0.925, respectively. There were no significant differences in the regression analyses of the three industry types (r2=0.964-0.982). Our data suggest that FPXRF data are highly correlated with those from the laboratory-based ICP method in terms of accuracy, precision, and bias. Therefore, FPXRF can be used for the rapid, on-site analysis of lead air-filter samples for values up to 26 μg/sample prior to laboratory confirmation by the ICP method.",
keywords = "FPXRF (field-portable x-ray fluorescence), ICP (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry), Lead",
author = "Kim, {Nam Soo} and Kim, {Jin Ho} and Ahn, {Kyu Dong} and Lee, {Byung Kook}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1539/joh.49.493",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "493--498",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Health",
issn = "1341-9145",
publisher = "Japan Society for Occupational Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of field-portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analyzer to measure airborne lead levels in Korean workplaces

AU - Kim, Nam Soo

AU - Kim, Jin Ho

AU - Ahn, Kyu Dong

AU - Lee, Byung Kook

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - We evaluated the possibility of applying field-portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analysis as a rapid, on-site and near real-time method for evaluating airborne lead contamination in Korean workplaces. A total of 287 airborne lead filter samples were measured in 12 lead-using workplaces during routine industrial hygienic monitoring procedures as required by Korean government regulations. All filter samples were collected using the standard industrial hygiene sampling protocol described in NIOSH Method 7300 using closed-face 37-mm cassettes with preloaded cellulose ester membrane filters with a pore size of 0.8 μm. The samples were first analyzed using the nondestructive, FPXRF analytical method (NIOSH method 7702), and then subsequently analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP) (NIOSH method 7300) as a reference analytical method. Pair-wise comparison of filter samples using the paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between the two methods over a wide range of airborne lead levels (0.018-0.201 μg/m3) either over the industries assessed or separately in the 12 lead-using workplaces. Linear regression of the data between the ICP and FPXRF methods produced a slope of 1.03, a y-intercept of 0.13 μg/sample, and a coefficient of determinant (r2) of 0.975 for all the data. For samples in the range from 0 to 100 ?g, the corresponding values were 1.07, -1.20 ?g/sample, and 0.925, respectively. There were no significant differences in the regression analyses of the three industry types (r2=0.964-0.982). Our data suggest that FPXRF data are highly correlated with those from the laboratory-based ICP method in terms of accuracy, precision, and bias. Therefore, FPXRF can be used for the rapid, on-site analysis of lead air-filter samples for values up to 26 μg/sample prior to laboratory confirmation by the ICP method.

AB - We evaluated the possibility of applying field-portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analysis as a rapid, on-site and near real-time method for evaluating airborne lead contamination in Korean workplaces. A total of 287 airborne lead filter samples were measured in 12 lead-using workplaces during routine industrial hygienic monitoring procedures as required by Korean government regulations. All filter samples were collected using the standard industrial hygiene sampling protocol described in NIOSH Method 7300 using closed-face 37-mm cassettes with preloaded cellulose ester membrane filters with a pore size of 0.8 μm. The samples were first analyzed using the nondestructive, FPXRF analytical method (NIOSH method 7702), and then subsequently analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP) (NIOSH method 7300) as a reference analytical method. Pair-wise comparison of filter samples using the paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between the two methods over a wide range of airborne lead levels (0.018-0.201 μg/m3) either over the industries assessed or separately in the 12 lead-using workplaces. Linear regression of the data between the ICP and FPXRF methods produced a slope of 1.03, a y-intercept of 0.13 μg/sample, and a coefficient of determinant (r2) of 0.975 for all the data. For samples in the range from 0 to 100 ?g, the corresponding values were 1.07, -1.20 ?g/sample, and 0.925, respectively. There were no significant differences in the regression analyses of the three industry types (r2=0.964-0.982). Our data suggest that FPXRF data are highly correlated with those from the laboratory-based ICP method in terms of accuracy, precision, and bias. Therefore, FPXRF can be used for the rapid, on-site analysis of lead air-filter samples for values up to 26 μg/sample prior to laboratory confirmation by the ICP method.

KW - FPXRF (field-portable x-ray fluorescence)

KW - ICP (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometry)

KW - Lead

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37649000938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37649000938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1539/joh.49.493

DO - 10.1539/joh.49.493

M3 - Article

C2 - 18075209

AN - SCOPUS:37649000938

VL - 49

SP - 493

EP - 498

JO - Journal of Occupational Health

JF - Journal of Occupational Health

SN - 1341-9145

IS - 6

ER -