Use of bronchoscopy in percutaneous dilational tracheostomy

Shekhar K. Gadkaree, Diane Schwartz, Kevin Gerold, Young Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE A modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a relatively new alternativemethod of performing PDTs in which tissues overlying the trachea are dissected, but needle entry is still performed blindly. Many centers use bronchoscopy-assisted PDT, but the necessity of bronchoscope assistance for modified PDTs has not been examined. Discontinuing bronchoscopy for this procedure could potentially decrease cost and increase efficiency with similar outcomes compared with bronchoscopy-assisted PDT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the necessity of bronchoscopy in placement of PDT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, retrospective cohort study of 149 patients who underwent PDT, with or without bronchoscope assistance, was conducted between May 1, 2007, and February 1, 2015, in a tertiary care facility. Data analysis was performed from April 15, 2015, to May 1, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Modified PDT with or without bronchoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes of interestwere postprocedural complications and length of stay during the hospitalization at which the tracheostomy was placed. RESULTS Of the 149 patients who underwent modified PDT during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, 107 were in the no-bronchoscope cohort (66 [61.7%] were men; mean [SD] age, 56.0 [18.7] years) and 42 were in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort (26 [61.9%] were men; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [15.7] years). Complications with PDT were significantly associated with use of a bronchoscope (odds ratio, 6.7; 95%CI, 1.3-43.4; P = .04). The rate of complications was 1.9%in the no-bronchoscope cohort and 11.9%in the bronchoscopeassisted cohort (P = .05). The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups (51.4 [49.4] days in the no-bronchoscope cohort vs 46.9 [28.6] days in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort; P = .58). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be performed with similarly low complication rates with or without the use of bronchoscopy. Discontinuing the use of bronchoscopy in these procedures appears to be a safe, cost-effective alternative with reassuring outcomes and low complication rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-149
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Tracheostomy
Bronchoscopy
Bronchoscopes
Length of Stay
Costs and Cost Analysis
Tertiary Healthcare
Trachea
Needles
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Use of bronchoscopy in percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. / Gadkaree, Shekhar K.; Schwartz, Diane; Gerold, Kevin; Kim, Young.

In: JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 142, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 143-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gadkaree, Shekhar K. ; Schwartz, Diane ; Gerold, Kevin ; Kim, Young. / Use of bronchoscopy in percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. In: JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 142, No. 2. pp. 143-149.
@article{e9088f5658bd42329ce6daa1c1955ee1,
title = "Use of bronchoscopy in percutaneous dilational tracheostomy",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE A modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a relatively new alternativemethod of performing PDTs in which tissues overlying the trachea are dissected, but needle entry is still performed blindly. Many centers use bronchoscopy-assisted PDT, but the necessity of bronchoscope assistance for modified PDTs has not been examined. Discontinuing bronchoscopy for this procedure could potentially decrease cost and increase efficiency with similar outcomes compared with bronchoscopy-assisted PDT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the necessity of bronchoscopy in placement of PDT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, retrospective cohort study of 149 patients who underwent PDT, with or without bronchoscope assistance, was conducted between May 1, 2007, and February 1, 2015, in a tertiary care facility. Data analysis was performed from April 15, 2015, to May 1, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Modified PDT with or without bronchoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes of interestwere postprocedural complications and length of stay during the hospitalization at which the tracheostomy was placed. RESULTS Of the 149 patients who underwent modified PDT during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, 107 were in the no-bronchoscope cohort (66 [61.7{\%}] were men; mean [SD] age, 56.0 [18.7] years) and 42 were in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort (26 [61.9{\%}] were men; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [15.7] years). Complications with PDT were significantly associated with use of a bronchoscope (odds ratio, 6.7; 95{\%}CI, 1.3-43.4; P = .04). The rate of complications was 1.9{\%}in the no-bronchoscope cohort and 11.9{\%}in the bronchoscopeassisted cohort (P = .05). The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups (51.4 [49.4] days in the no-bronchoscope cohort vs 46.9 [28.6] days in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort; P = .58). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be performed with similarly low complication rates with or without the use of bronchoscopy. Discontinuing the use of bronchoscopy in these procedures appears to be a safe, cost-effective alternative with reassuring outcomes and low complication rates.",
author = "Gadkaree, {Shekhar K.} and Diane Schwartz and Kevin Gerold and Young Kim",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "143--149",
journal = "Archives of Otolaryngology",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of bronchoscopy in percutaneous dilational tracheostomy

AU - Gadkaree, Shekhar K.

AU - Schwartz, Diane

AU - Gerold, Kevin

AU - Kim, Young

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE A modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a relatively new alternativemethod of performing PDTs in which tissues overlying the trachea are dissected, but needle entry is still performed blindly. Many centers use bronchoscopy-assisted PDT, but the necessity of bronchoscope assistance for modified PDTs has not been examined. Discontinuing bronchoscopy for this procedure could potentially decrease cost and increase efficiency with similar outcomes compared with bronchoscopy-assisted PDT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the necessity of bronchoscopy in placement of PDT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, retrospective cohort study of 149 patients who underwent PDT, with or without bronchoscope assistance, was conducted between May 1, 2007, and February 1, 2015, in a tertiary care facility. Data analysis was performed from April 15, 2015, to May 1, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Modified PDT with or without bronchoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes of interestwere postprocedural complications and length of stay during the hospitalization at which the tracheostomy was placed. RESULTS Of the 149 patients who underwent modified PDT during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, 107 were in the no-bronchoscope cohort (66 [61.7%] were men; mean [SD] age, 56.0 [18.7] years) and 42 were in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort (26 [61.9%] were men; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [15.7] years). Complications with PDT were significantly associated with use of a bronchoscope (odds ratio, 6.7; 95%CI, 1.3-43.4; P = .04). The rate of complications was 1.9%in the no-bronchoscope cohort and 11.9%in the bronchoscopeassisted cohort (P = .05). The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups (51.4 [49.4] days in the no-bronchoscope cohort vs 46.9 [28.6] days in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort; P = .58). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be performed with similarly low complication rates with or without the use of bronchoscopy. Discontinuing the use of bronchoscopy in these procedures appears to be a safe, cost-effective alternative with reassuring outcomes and low complication rates.

AB - IMPORTANCE A modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a relatively new alternativemethod of performing PDTs in which tissues overlying the trachea are dissected, but needle entry is still performed blindly. Many centers use bronchoscopy-assisted PDT, but the necessity of bronchoscope assistance for modified PDTs has not been examined. Discontinuing bronchoscopy for this procedure could potentially decrease cost and increase efficiency with similar outcomes compared with bronchoscopy-assisted PDT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the necessity of bronchoscopy in placement of PDT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, retrospective cohort study of 149 patients who underwent PDT, with or without bronchoscope assistance, was conducted between May 1, 2007, and February 1, 2015, in a tertiary care facility. Data analysis was performed from April 15, 2015, to May 1, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Modified PDT with or without bronchoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes of interestwere postprocedural complications and length of stay during the hospitalization at which the tracheostomy was placed. RESULTS Of the 149 patients who underwent modified PDT during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, 107 were in the no-bronchoscope cohort (66 [61.7%] were men; mean [SD] age, 56.0 [18.7] years) and 42 were in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort (26 [61.9%] were men; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [15.7] years). Complications with PDT were significantly associated with use of a bronchoscope (odds ratio, 6.7; 95%CI, 1.3-43.4; P = .04). The rate of complications was 1.9%in the no-bronchoscope cohort and 11.9%in the bronchoscopeassisted cohort (P = .05). The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 groups (51.4 [49.4] days in the no-bronchoscope cohort vs 46.9 [28.6] days in the bronchoscope-assisted cohort; P = .58). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy can be performed with similarly low complication rates with or without the use of bronchoscopy. Discontinuing the use of bronchoscopy in these procedures appears to be a safe, cost-effective alternative with reassuring outcomes and low complication rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958956119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958956119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3123

DO - 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3123

M3 - Article

C2 - 26720516

AN - SCOPUS:84958956119

VL - 142

SP - 143

EP - 149

JO - Archives of Otolaryngology

JF - Archives of Otolaryngology

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 2

ER -