TY - JOUR
T1 - Urinary Catheters after Total Joint Replacement Surgery
AU - Musher, Daniel M.
AU - Michelson, James
PY - 1988/12/15
Y1 - 1988/12/15
N2 - To the Editor: Michelson et al. (Aug. 11 issue)1 reported that the short-term use of an indwelling catheter caused no more infection than did intermittent bladder catheterization as needed for acute retention in the day or two after joint-replacement surgery. Unless I missed it, an important omission from this article was specific reference to the dose and duration of perioperative antibiotic therapy. I suspect that all the patients received an antibiotic, probably a cephalosporin and probably one with a long half-life. If, in fact, prophylaxis was continued for 24 hours (which is often the case), this treatment would have had.
AB - To the Editor: Michelson et al. (Aug. 11 issue)1 reported that the short-term use of an indwelling catheter caused no more infection than did intermittent bladder catheterization as needed for acute retention in the day or two after joint-replacement surgery. Unless I missed it, an important omission from this article was specific reference to the dose and duration of perioperative antibiotic therapy. I suspect that all the patients received an antibiotic, probably a cephalosporin and probably one with a long half-life. If, in fact, prophylaxis was continued for 24 hours (which is often the case), this treatment would have had.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024231958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024231958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198812153192422
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198812153192422
M3 - Letter
C2 - 3200276
AN - SCOPUS:0024231958
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 319
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 24
ER -